beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 35,845
Oh so that makes all the imperialism alright does it? There was a system of principalities that also played sports together and traded in spices and married their daughters and sons - kinda like the kings and queens of Europe. Why is there way considered any different to ours - arrogance perchance?!
did i say that, or simply ask a question? you make a clear statement, im questioning if its correct, not making a judgment on politics of the region before, during or after the British rule.
im no graduate of history, but having seen your comment of "model of religiuos intergration it had proved to be for the previous 2000 years", im sure the Sikhs would disagree. did the Muslims wander into the region unopposed? about 10 minutes of wikipedia reading suggest either an awfull lot of made up stories of martydom, conflict and war, or your knowledge is rather cherry picked. the states of Europe traded together married sons and daughters, pretty sure there was alot of fighting too and they certainly where not the same country
Last edited: