Yes AND no. Basically there are probably LOADS. Some reach the papers and some dont.
Its the Max Clifford thing. Essentially its dont run that story about xxxxxx instead I will give you a story about yyyyyy instead.
On the one hand I can see why if one team has had play ET in a prev round they may not be as "fresh" as a team that have not.
But on the other hand I can see teams playing even more for a penalty shoot out than before so overall I think its a bad decision if it happens.
Its a SLOW burner Im afraid. It rewards viewers who keep with it. Something will happen in one episode and then it will be another two or three before its touched or elaborated on again.
Eg in the first series so Im not giving anything away here, a bloke on the train calls Don Draper, Dick...
Yes it does. I have series 3 to catch up on and Im Sky + series 4.
Regret I did see a couple of spoilers for series 3 which I am not going to share for those that havent seen the second let alone the third.
Its the HAND WRINGERS. NSC at its finest.
Rules are rules etc.
Love him or loathe him Clarkson was right with needing a ministry for common sense. This would have been laughed at and im sure they would FINE the train company for being so f***ing STUPID.
I absolutely agree with this.
Like you say realistically its the only chance that most lover division players will have to turn out at Wemberley.
That and people paid to see it.
What POOyet should have said is *I will use my full squad for this game where possible*
Meaning that we know he...
You could argue that its an unfair contract term and I would be interested to see the small print saying you cant disembark at an earlier stop.
It really is jobs for the boys and the world has gone mad.
Utterly, utterly ridiculous.