aolstudios
Well-known member
I posted the link to the article which I thought you would at least cast an eye over - As stated, these rape claims come from Israeli Government sources - the NYT and other media outlets ARE NOT THE PRIMARY SOURCES if you can’t be bothered to read the article then I’ll post some excerpts below - I would ask everyone who is taking these claims as facts to read the whole article. in the link above.
And @aolstudios - No of course I dont want it to be true - why would I want it to be true that women have been brutally raped and assaulted? , I find it extraordinary that you do to the extent that you are not even willing to fact check your own X links.
These are CLAIMS of assault but if true, I would want a source of that evidence provided by something other than Netanyahu’s right wing Government at war with the alleged perpetrators.
The Western media have been provided with all this source material from the Israeli Government on the form of a video presentation prepared for the Press - they are claims that have NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED.
————-
“More than two months after Hamas' unprecedented cross-border attack on October 7, the Israeli government's allegations of sexual violence by Palestinian resistance fighters have resurfaced as headlines in major international media outlets such as BBC, CNN, New Yorker, and New York Times.
These outlets have published explicit stories of alleged sexual violence, including accounts of gang rape and mutilation.
This renewed focus on the issue comes after the Israeli army held exclusive screenings for invited journalists of what it claims are eyewitness accounts of alleged Hamas crimes.
The 47-minute footage titled 'Bearing Witness to the October 7 Massacre' was screened on multiple occasions. However, Israeli officials have refused to share the footage with news agencies to report on and verify the contents independently.
This detail holds great significance. Despite offering extensive coverage of information conveyed by Israeli officials in these news reports, all of them carry a subtle disclaimer: that they cannot independently "verify individual allegations and claims".
In its quest for a thorough understanding of the significance of independent verification, TRT World contacted the UN, Human Rights Watch, and Amnesty International, organisations which investigate sexual violence allegations in conflict zones, to reveal the methods, approaches, and procedures they employ for verification.
"We are required to gather information from a wide variety of reliable sources (including civil society, victims' organisations, concerned states and non-state actors) to verify the veracity of the information we received," Reem Alsalem, UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls, its causes and consequence, tells TRT World.
She emphasises the importance of verifying reports of sexual violence and conducting thorough investigations independently, as highlighted in two previous press releases addressing Israel's accusations of sexual violence attributed to Hamas – one on November 20 and the other on December 14.
Reliable sources
When asked about the crucial steps that investigative teams deem essential in probing allegations of sexual violence in conflict zones, Lauren Aarons, Amnesty International's senior adviser on gender and conflict, concurs with the UN Special Rapporteur, emphasising the necessity to gather information from a diverse array of reliable sources.
All of these suggest that Israel's rape accusations, attributed to Hamas, rely on anything but a wide variety of unreliable, one-sided sources echoing the Israeli state's narrative.
However, the question remains: Can we believe what Israel says based on the evidence provided by these not-so-reliable sources?
Where is the evidence?
Not only are the sources in question but also the evidence presented during interviews, briefings and screenings of footage provided by the Israeli state raise concerns.
Israel has consistently fallen short in furnishing news organisations with forensic evidence, concrete photographic proof, or victim testimonies, relying instead on inferences from its forensic teams and individuals mentioned above who evidently have ties to the Israeli government.
Currently, Israel's case relies on the video testimony of a sole eyewitness at the Nova music festival, detailing the purported gang rape, mutilation, and execution of one victim.
News reports also indicate that Israeli police claim to have "multiple" eyewitness accounts of sexual assault, but they have not provided further clarification on the exact number. Furthermore, it has been reported that Israeli police have not yet interviewed any of the purported rape survivors.
So far, Israeli government officials have yet to provide concrete information regarding the precise number of so-called victims“
Unsubstantiated claims
Among those who attended one of the briefings of the Israeli government was British journalist Owen Jones, who released a YouTube video providing a detailed account of the Israeli state's screening session concerning these accusations.
"Some high-profile crimes are not substantiated by this footage", he notes, adding, "If there was rape and sexual violence committed, we don't see this on the footage either."
In the video, he emphasises the need for independent verification of the rape accusations, stating, "All of the footage in the possession of the Israeli state should be given over to independent journalists and professional analysts to build a fully accurate picture of exactly what happened that day."
However, the Times of Israel asserts that the Israeli army will not provide forensic evidence, stating that "physical evidence of sexual assault was not collected from corpses by Israel's overtaxed morgue facilities." According to reports, it is now considered too late to gather conclusive evidence.”
Ok, I've given you the benefit of the doubt this far but I don't think I believe you post in good faith on here. Ever.
Your increasingly desperate, bizarrely massive, hysterical screeds, claiming to be neutral while without exception somehow managing to be an apologist for Hamas, or casting doubt on verified facts that every grownup news organisation have now accepted.
I'm not sure I even believe you are who you claim to be.
There's something off about you. You're either a fake, unwell or absolutely twisted. Sorry if it's the middle option but I just don't believe you any more