Are conspiracy theories destroying democracy?

[Nibble]

There were a lot of buildings in-between the twin towers and building 7. Simple enough?

A bit too simple in fact. Can you expand ,perhaps in some detail how you think it collapsed then?

 

[The Truth]

hopelessly oversimplistic. and you still evade the direct question about WTC 1 and 2 above. do you have an answer, or are we to assume that you are only following someone else's version, following some elses agenda?

I've answered your question and it's you who accepts someone else's version to help their agenda (USA). I'm speculating it.

 

[The Truth]

A bit too simple in fact. Can you expand ,perhaps in some detail how you think it collapsed then?

Controlled demolition. How do you think building 7 collapsed?

 

[symyjym]

Controlled demolition. How do you think building 7 collapsed?

I've given you a link to the reasons why WTC 7 collapsed in the video below.

 

[Nibble]

Controlled demolition. How do you think building 7 collapsed?

Ah, there's that famous detail The Truth is so famed for.

Me? I dunno, what did it say in the paper? That one anyway.

 

[beorhthelm]

I've answered your question and it's you who accepts someone else's version to help their agenda (USA). I'm speculating it.

interesting. do you think you have answered a question by raising another? because thats all your responces have been. i see from the post following this you believe WTC7 was controlled demolition, so i'll infer that you believe the same about WTC 1 and 2. despite no evidence for this. and as i say earlier, because you latch on to this, rejecting the possibility that it did collapse due to the plane strike, you will never be able to advance the question of who or why was behind that action. nevermind, i see you want to believe what you want to believe.

 

[Barrel of Fun]

Controlled demolition? When did they find time to sneak in the explosives or were they already there, waiting for something to happen in the vicinity to provide the perfect opportunity?

Also, why did they want to destroy WTC7 and how many people were in on it?

 

[The Truth]

Ah, there's that famous detail The Truth is so famed for.

Me? I dunno, what did it say in the paper? That one anyway.

Do you need me to tell you in detail what a controlled demolition is? Pedantic to say the least.

 

[Nibble]

Controlled demolition? When did they find time to sneak in the explosives or were they already there, waiting for something to happen in the vicinity to provide the perfect opportunity?

Also, why did they want to destroy WTC7 and how many people were in on it?

I can answer one of those. T7 contained very important secret documents "they" wanted destroyed. They needed to find the most secretive, quiet, way they could to destroy them so that nobody would notice them doing it and forever remain a secret. After much deliberation the US government decided the way to destroy these files and with the least fuss and media coverage possible was to fly two commercial airline jets into two of the busiest sky-scrapers in one of the busiest cities on the planet in one of the most media heavy countries on earth at rush hour. Shhhh!

 

[beorhthelm]

Also, why did they want to destroy WTC7 and how many people were in on it?

oh, i can answer that. lots of government agencies where based there and had lots of secret files they wanted destroyed. they cant risk trucking them out to a location for destruction, or extend the budget to some shredders. so when one of them was planning to blow up the WTC 1 and 2, using thier offices in WTC 7 as the command center for that operation, it seemed a very usfull oppurtunity. two birds and all that.

 

[The Truth]

Controlled demolition? When did they find time to sneak in the explosives or were they already there, waiting for something to happen in the vicinity to provide the perfect opportunity?

Also, why did they want to destroy WTC7 and how many people were in on it?

I wouldn't know how they organised the operation in destroying the building but I am aware that building 7 contained and stored lots of financial information.

 

[symyjym]

I wouldn't know how they organised the operation in destroying the building but I am aware that building 7 contained and stored lots of financial information.

A fire would have had the same desired effect if the directive was about destroying information.

 

[The Truth]

A fire would have had the same desired effect if the directive was about destroying information.

Tactically, it probably would of been a bad idea considering the amount of fire service called into the area at that time. A demolition couldn't of been prevented. Either way, it would of still looked very suspect.

 

[symyjym]

Tactically, it probably would of been a bad idea considering the amount of fire service called into the area at that time. A demolition couldn't of been prevented. Either way, it would of still looked very suspect.

Not really, I think you give the Yanks too much credit for pulling off such a massive 911 operation without anything going wrong. They are unable to do perfect, even getting Bin Laden they crashed one of the two helicopters, and that was a tiny weeny opperation by comparison.

I seem to remember clearly that going to Afghanistan was an unwelcome distraction because they were gearing up to go to war with Iraq at the time. They went to Afghanistan quickly and left quickly and unfinished to get on with their primary objective of getting Saddam Hussein out. That's how incompetent they are.

Both wars were littered with failures and incompetence and that is factual knowledge and this is accepted by the world, including the American government.
The American couldn’t have carried out 911 even if they wanted to.

 

[The Truth]

The American couldn’t have carried out 911 even if they wanted to.

Some people believe we are being manipulated by the richest people in the world. These people are the ones many believe to be behind financially beneficial terrorist attacks. The oil companies have massive says these days. I read a conspiracy telling 'tales' of how the rockerfeller family were funding oil for the Germans and US during ww2, believe it or not. Some one gets rich from these wars.

 

[beorhthelm]

Tactically, it probably would of been a bad idea considering the amount of fire service called into the area at that time. A demolition couldn't of been prevented. Either way, it would of still looked very suspect.

so, it would be a bad idea to have a fire due to the presense of so many firefighters, so they did a demolition instead? well done for contradicting your own theory.

 

[The Truth]

so, it would be a bad idea to have a fire due to the presense of so many firefighters, so they did a demolition instead? well done for contradicting your own theory.

What's your theory then? I've asked you enough questions, any chance of answering any of them?

 

[Leighgull]

Is this shit thread still going? Bloody hell 18 pages of wall eyed mongery.

 

[One Love]

Yes I do support Brighton and Hove Albion. In all honesty though I have lost a lot of interest since the re branding of our club name from rangers to Albion. I think the 2 point system is a lot more logical and see no reason why they've changed the rules for Keepers not being allowed to pick up back passes? The game is changing for the worst!
Now I've answered your question, can you now answer mine? I never see you posting about shampoo and conditioner, ever! do you ever clean your hair Hitony?

This is a Brighton & Hove Albion forum not a hair care one.

I like the sarcasm though, in an effort to change direction. You are good at that.

 

[One Love]

Just believe in people and even if you don't, at least respect them for having an alternative angle, don't just start insulting them with crappy analytical responses about other 'conspiracy theorist you've met'.
Judging them isn't much love, onelove. You've made the call we are ignorant and liars, you're the one claiming for sure what the answers are. We are just speculating info which doesn't get through main stream media, there's no harm in detective work, it's better than being ignorant.

Good grief