Are conspiracy theories destroying democracy?

[The Truth]

I don't buy into most conspiracy theories. But I have no doubt in the following: There was at least a second gunman that shot JFK. The world trade centre buildings did not collapse due to the planes hitting. Whatever hit the pentagon was not a plane.

According to the majority on here, that means you believe in them all!
Good one for thinking for yourself though, as the majority aren't always correct.

 

[symyjym]

According to the majority on here, that means you believe in them all!
Good one for thinking for yourself though, as the majority aren't always correct.

This is the sixth time I have asked:

What are your thoughts on the Richard Gage WTC collapse demonstration? And should we believe without a shadow of doubt, his version, based on his less than scientific methods in the video?

Please answer me

 

[beorhthelm]

... The world trade centre buildings did not collapse due to the planes hitting. ...

there are obvious questions about JFK and the 9/11 Pentagon damage for the average person. but, what exactly makes you sure that WTC didnt collapse due to a plane strike?

 

[The Truth]

This is the sixth time I have asked:

What are your thoughts on the Richard Gage WTC collapse demonstration? And should we believe without a shadow of doubt, his version, based on his less than scientific methods in the video?

Please answer me

Richard cage is probably a mis informer who helps make a conspiracy look like a lie.
The oil sharks must be loving his theory.

 

[symyjym]

Richard cage is probably a mis informer who helps make a conspiracy look like a lie.
The oil sharks must be loving his theory.

Thanks, I appreciate this response.

I saw a National Geographic conspiracy documentary and Richard Gage, Dylan Avery and Professer Steven E Jones appeared together at the same table, in the same room.

Are all three mis informers and can they all be discredited?

 

[The Truth]

Thanks, I appreciate this response.

I saw a National Geographic conspiracy documentary and Richard Gage, Dylan Avery and Professer Steven E Jones appeared together at the same table, in the same room.

Are all three mis informers and can they all be discredited?

View attachment 48306View attachment 48307View attachment 48308

What do you think first? Are you suggesting they are informers of the truth?

 

[hybrid_x]

heheh......the sheep on here who ring fence CT's as 'one' and jump to the official story of 9/11 as a shield make me laugh so much.

Even a 1940s Disney (Walt Disney was a high ranking Mason) Cartoon for kids told them how things are.....but admitting that these are how thing are brings in questions as to how one lives their lives - and we can't have that now can we.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vnp4kj5lLOU

 

[The Truth]

there are obvious questions about JFK and the 9/11 Pentagon damage for the average person. but, what exactly makes you sure that WTC didnt collapse due to a plane strike?

What makes you so sure the WTC and building 7 collapsed due to 1 or 2 aeroplanes?

 

[symyjym]

What do you think first? Are you suggesting they are informers?

Thanks for responding, this is what debating is all about.

I am suggesting that they all want notoriety and are only in it for their own financial gain. Basically no better than the government they are trying to discredit themselves.

Political commentator Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit 9/11 is a great film and there is no intention to deceive, however it does not even touch on the 911 conspiracies that the above people mentioned are trying to promote.

I have far more time for conspiracy theorists if they can differentiate fact from fiction and the possible from the impossible.

You have to agree that Gage, Dylan and Jones are the leading campaigners in the 911 CT.

I see the 911 CT as a conspiracy in it’s own right and anyone who buys into conspiracies also buy into these peoples account of what happened on 911, and will always use their arguments in trying to explain it and every other conspiracy is linked.

They certainly do cover up what is going on in the world and do more harm than good.

Do they work for the government themselves? Possibly?

And if it is possible maybe the 911 CT's need to scrutinise them more seriously instead of having blind faith in what these people are promoting.

 

[beorhthelm]

What makes you so sure the WTC and building 7 collapsed due to 1 or 2 aeroplanes?

nice distraction. no one has ever made that claim. see what i mean about conspiracy theory, you just cant focus a debate you have to constantly broaden and convolute the story. i dont suppose you have any answer to the same question, what makes you think something other than a plane strike caused WTC 1 and 2 to collapse?

 

[The Truth]

nice distraction. no one has ever made that claim. see what i mean about conspiracy theory, you just cant focus a debate you have to constantly broaden and convolute the story. i dont suppose you have any answer to the same question, what makes you think something other than a plane strike caused WTC 1 and 2 to collapse?

Because building 7 collapsed, you'd be stupid to not question the logic of the reports.

 

[The Truth]

Thanks for responding, this is what debating is all about.

I am suggesting that they all want notoriety and are only in it for their own financial gain. Basically no better than the government they are trying to discredit themselves.

Political commentator Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit 9/11 is a great film and there is no intention to deceive, however it does not even touch on the 911 conspiracies that the above people mentioned are trying to promote.

I have far more time for conspiracy theorists if they can differentiate fact from fiction and the possible from the impossible.

You have to agree that Gage, Dylan and Jones are the leading campaigners in the 911 CT.

I see the 911 CT as a conspiracy in it’s own right and anyone who buys into conspiracies also buy into these peoples account of what happened on 911, and will always use their arguments in trying to explain it and every other conspiracy is linked.

They certainly do cover up what is going on in the world and do more harm than good.

Do they work for the government themselves? Possibly?

And if it is possible maybe the 911 CT's need to scrutinise them more seriously instead of having blind faith in what these people are promoting.

I think Michael Moore is too a mis informer. What's your views on him?

 

[beorhthelm]

Because building 7 collapsed, you'd be stupid to not question the logic of the reports.

why cant you address a direct question directly? i said in earlier post there maybe questions to raise, but why swtich to WTC 7 when the question was about WTC 1 and 2? i dont think you read, let alone understood that earlier post, even thogh you repsonded to it.

 

[The Truth]

why cant you address a direct question directly? i said earlier there maybe questions to raise, but why swtich to WTC 7 when the question was about WTC 1 and 2?

You're missing the point. It all happened at the same time and building 7 was left out of the official report.

 

[symyjym]

I think Michael Moore is too a mis informer. What's your views on him?

I've just given to you my view on him.

What you have said is you think Michael Moore is a mis informer too. Does that mean you think Gage, Dylan and Jones are, and you think Michael Moore is ts well?

 

[Barrel of Fun]

Is it not possible that the WTC7 did collapse due to damage sustained from the other collapses or is that too simplistic?

 

[The Truth]

I've just given to you my view on him.

What you have said is you think Michael Moore is a mis informer too. Does that mean you think Gage, Dylan and Jones are, and you think Michael Moore is ts well?

They might, they might not, but what's more important is that we understand that the invasion of Afghanistan was caused because of these events. Millions have died all based on the very flimsy evidence we are shown on the 9/11 attacks. There are probably loads of mis-informers to go searching for, but it's the truth you want to find

 

[The Truth]

Is it not possible that the WTC7 did collapse due to damage sustained from the other collapses or is that too simplistic?

There were a lot of buildings in-between the twin towers and building 7. Simple enough?

 

[symyjym]

Is it not possible that the WTC7 did collapse due to damage sustained from the other collapses or is that too simplistic?

Agree, like the video below explains:

 

[beorhthelm]

There were a lot of buildings in-between the twin towers and building 7. Simple enough?

hopelessly oversimplistic. and you still evade the direct question about WTC 1 and 2 above. do you have an answer, or are we to assume that you are only following someone else's version, following some elses agenda?