NSFG - Murray signs for palace

[peterward]

so much for "its a done deal" from various sources.

It is a done deal by most accounts.... this is an article today.Though it would be hilarious if it didn't happen, its gonna happen.

http://www.streathamguardian.co.uk/sport/9044770.Murray_on_verge_of_Palace_move/

 

[peterward]

Double post. Removed

 

[EagleDave]

It is a definite done deal, he has even met the squad.

I dont see why there is all the fuss over an official announcement?!

 

[Surrey_Albion]

Murray who? Didnt he once play for us, he went because he knew he wouldnt get a start in our team next season

 

[Daffy Duck]

Surely if it hasn't been announced, he hasn't signed yet.

We all know that as soon as clubs make a new signing, they can't wait to announce it!

 

[bhaexpress]

Legally he can't actually sign until his contract with us ends and that is not until next week. Given that Freedman has denied that he was signing him somebody is telling porkies.

 

[8ace]

Legally he can't actually sign until his contract with us ends and that is not until next week. Given that Freedman has denied that he was signing him somebody is telling porkies.

He can sign a pre-contract though.

 

[bhaexpress]

He can sign a pre-contract though.

I expect he's waiting on a credit check.

 

[8ace]

I expect he's waiting on a credit check.

Anyone with any sense would.

 

[GlennMurray]

Have just seen on SSN "sky sources: Brighton's Glenn Murray agrees three-year-deal with Crystal Palace"

 

[8ace]

Have just seen on SSN "sky sources: Brighton's Glenn Murray agrees three-year-deal with Crystal Palace"

Are you going to change your username?

 

[bhaexpress]

Have just seen on SSN "sky sources: Brighton's Glenn Murray agrees three-year-deal with Crystal Palace"

Three years ? At least they've got the sense to sign a League One Striker now.

 

[Marc1901]

If they have signed him am I the only one who thinks that Murray & Ambrose is a much better partnership then Hoskins and Barnes?

 

[turienzo's lovechild]

If they have signed him am I the only one who thinks that Murray & Ambrose is a much better partnership then Hoskins and Barnes?

or maybe you're the only one who thinks the season starts tomorrow?

 

[Marc1901]

or maybe you're the only one who thinks the season starts tomorrow?

Well im looking at what we have at this moment in time, which is Hoskins and Barnes. Maybe we will bring more in but at the moment those are the two strikers we have.

 

[turienzo's lovechild]

Well im looking at what we have at this moment in time, which is Hoskins and Barnes. Maybe we will bring more in but at the moment those are the two strikers we have.

yes

and?

 

[8ace]

Isn't Ambrose going to QPR?

 

[Marc1901]

yes

and?

And Murray and Ambrose is a better partnership if he has signed for them.

 

[turienzo's lovechild]

And Murray and Ambrose is a better partnership if he has signed for them.

hoskins and barnes is unlikely to be our first choice strike partnership, so any comparisons to other teams is pointless

 

[Marc1901]

hoskins and barnes is unlikely to be our first choice strike partnership, so any comparisons to other teams is pointless

It's not though is it because that's what we have at the moment, we don't know what strikers we are going to bring in so these two COULD be our strike force next season.