Milton Keynes Seagull
Active member
I think we know the answer to that dont we ?
Those of with common sense and who live in the real world do indeed!
I think we know the answer to that dont we ?
Ive not been following this due to moving apartments, but on the face of it, removing non white/non English children? from a couple who are members of a party that is vehemenantly against multiculturism, and immigration doesnt seem that horrendous to me...disturbs me more that they got the children in the first place, bringing this removal and disruption to the foster parents, and the childrens lives
Ive not read the full thread, but I can guess most of it......would people be against BNP members fostering black/asian children, or would that go against the BNP foster parents 'rights'? I can imagine the labour party is against their local council causing a fuss before elections etc. I can imagine the right wingers whinging about 'rights' etc..... at the end of the day, whats best for the children is paramount., and whilst they may be incredible foster parents, I would still be a bit concerned about what sort of education they would recieve from foster parents with, what I consider extreme views.
They werent non white, they were european, and as you yourself have stated , you havent been following the case, I suggest you read up on it , and if your conclusion is still the same, i.e , the removal of the children is justified, then I have to wonder at your motives and aspirations for a free society in britain.Ive not been following this due to moving apartments, but on the face of it, removing non white/non English children? from a couple who are members of a party that is vehemenantly against multiculturism, and immigration doesnt seem that horrendous to me...disturbs me more that they got the children in the first place, bringing this removal and disruption to the foster parents, and the childrens lives
Ive not read the full thread, but I can guess most of it......would people be against BNP members fostering black/asian children, or would that go against the BNP foster parents 'rights'? I can imagine the labour party is against their local council causing a fuss before elections etc. I can imagine the right wingers whinging about 'rights' etc..... at the end of the day, whats best for the children is paramount., and whilst they may be incredible foster parents, I would still be a bit concerned about what sort of education they would recieve from foster parents with, what I consider extreme views.
I am in Glasgow on business and I just asked someone whether UKIP were represented in Scotland. The answer is yes but what followed has genuinely shocked me but appears to be true as several other people around the table who also know the man in question personally backed the original statement.
The UKIP candidate that stood at the last election is known amongst his friends as an anti Semite. He believes passionately that the Holocaust did not happen but is a Jewish myth. His views are apparently well known but this did not prevent and still does not prevent him being a member of UKIP.
Cameron, for once, is right. UKIP is the home of closet racists.
OK name him then.
No, that would be inviting a libel charge. I am passing on something that has been said to me from people I have no reason to believe are being anything but honest.
Ive not been following this due to moving apartments, but on the face of it, removing non white/non English children? from a couple who are members of a party that is vehemenantly against multiculturism, and immigration doesnt seem that horrendous to me...disturbs me more that they got the children in the first place, bringing this removal and disruption to the foster parents, and the childrens lives
Ive not read the full thread, but I can guess most of it......would people be against BNP members fostering black/asian children, or would that go against the BNP foster parents 'rights'? I can imagine the labour party is against their local council causing a fuss before elections etc. I can imagine the right wingers whinging about 'rights' etc..... at the end of the day, whats best for the children is paramount., and whilst they may be incredible foster parents, I would still be a bit concerned about what sort of education they would recieve from foster parents with, what I consider extreme views.
unsubstantiated hearsay then with no proof whatsoever.
I mentioned bnp as another situation buzzer....I know its ukip....
Its not a matter of 'political' prejudice...common sense tells you that the UKIP, a party that is against multiculturalism, and immigration, is probably not the best source of foster parents for non English children.
He did. He asked if we'd feel the same if they had been BNP supporters.If you'd read the thread you might at least have got the party they support right.
Back at you.Not your finest hour.
I thought it was common acceptance that multiculturalism is defunct and immigration is an issue.
Not from what ive seen posted by some ukip members on some pages biggully.... also, from their own page...
6 Our Way Of Life
Our traditional values have been undermined. Children are taught to be ashamed of our past. Multiculturalism has split our society. Political correctness is stifling free speech.
They seem to be 'blaming' multiculturalism for splitting our society.
Not from what ive seen posted by some ukip members on some pages biggully.... also, from their own page...
6 Our Way Of Life
Our traditional values have been undermined. Children are taught to be ashamed of our past. Multiculturalism has split our society. Political correctness is stifling free speech.
I mentioned bnp as another situation buzzer....I know its ukip....
Its not a matter of 'political' prejudice...common sense tells you that the supporters/members of UKIP, a party that is against multiculturalism, and immigration, is probably not the best source of foster parents for non English children.
If UKIP is supposed to be full of closet racists,