Indeed. Russia does it every day of course...Yes. Unless they've recently changed the Geneva Convention, deliberate targeting of civilians is not allowed. Even if your enemy did it first.
Indeed. Russia does it every day of course...Yes. Unless they've recently changed the Geneva Convention, deliberate targeting of civilians is not allowed. Even if your enemy did it first.
Bollocks. WWII was a legitimate fight for the allies. Unlike Putin's 'Special Military Operation' there was a genuine need to defeat fascism, and I'm damn glad our parents and grandparents did just that, and f*** any wet wimps who start whinging and wringing their hands about it.
And it shouldn’t be being made into such a big deal now it’s been lifted. There shouldn’t be any reporting around it at all.
Well to a point.But the reporting of it gives us hope for Ukraine and that's a good thing.
Because Russia have been unable to win on the battlefield, one of their key strategies has been to spread propaganda to pretend that they will win, and so people should stop supporting Ukraine. The news that Ukraine now have more ability to fight back helps fight that propaganda.
It would depend on where their head chef Les car goes.If we do end up putting troops in, I hope the French are put in charge of the catering.
The rules for conflict were created in 1949 at the Geneva convention, weren't they? Om which case surely the Allies can't have committed war crimes before then, because they didn't exist.You seem to be confused between your personal opinion and what the world has agreed are war crimes. I'm not saying you can't be glad that our ancestors did what they did, but you're incorrect to say that no war crimes were committed by the allies.
I don't know the answer to this, genuinely, but were they actually marked as war crimes in WW2?. Geneva convention was afterwards of course but I don't know what the predecessor (Hague ?) said. To be clear, I'm not doubting that the Allies did commit what would be classed as war crimes today.You seem to be confused between your personal opinion and what the world has agreed are war crimes. I'm not saying you can't be glad that our ancestors did what they did, but you're incorrect to say that no war crimes were committed by the allies.
But then I’d have blasted Russia back to the sulphur swamps the minute it attempted to take Crimea in 2014.
No, there were rules of engagement before the first World War.The rules for conflict were created in 1949 at the Geneva convention, weren't they? Om which case surely the Allies can't have committed war crimes before then, because they didn't exist.
I don't know the answer to this, genuinely, but were they actually marked as war crimes in WW2?. Geneva convention was afterwards of course but I don't know what the predecessor (Hague ?) said. To be clear, I'm not doubting that the Allies did commit what would be classed as war crimes today.