@Triggaaar @Zeberdi you two should go for a beer together and have a discussion.
You could just do what most people do and put you hands over your ears - or put us on ignore@Triggaaar @Zeberdi you two should go for a beer together and have a discussion.
Firstly, get you facts right - you are really off the mark here and betraying a lack of knowledge
Secondly, while Netanyahu says one thing, he is beholden to his extreme coalition partners that prop up his permiership.
This is the policy of the Lukid Party of which he has been a member and leader for decades
“The right of the Jewish people to the land of Israel is eternal and indisputable…
This is what I don’t understand about your PoV that Russia wants a war to escalate in the ME - why would Russia support an Israel v Iran War (which is what we were originally talking about when comparing who was the most risk to global stability in terms of escalating regional warfare) which would tax Iran’s military resources when it is Iran (and others) that is supplying weapons to Russia?
And that is where the problem lies. If Israel is not armed then they get wiped of the face of the planet …..The west need to stop arming him.
You're wrong and your attempts at patronising won't help.
I know what Gaza is and whether you're referring to the Gaza Strip or city, it is not the whole of Palestine. And regardless of which part of Gaza, it is not currently Israel's policy to occupy it, so I'm not sure what your point is.
it's still not correct to say that their policy is to take over the whole of Palestine.
Agreed - But this is Netanyahu the leader of Israel, the Lukid Party policy (Netanyahu‘s Party) - you keep repeatedly saying it is not the current policy of Israel to claim the whole of Palestine but it is - you can’t dismiss his position on Palestine as a few minority opponents- they are the ruling Party and crucially, it is feeding in to how he is conducting the war against Hamas and Hezbollah in the OPT (including the West Bank)And equally you'll find opponents who deny Israel's right to exist at all. Neither point of view is just and neither should be supported.
Literally can’t argue with someone who doesn’t even know what they said - you clearly said Gaza was a City
I also made it really clear that the West Bank and East Jerusalem were part of Palestine too so of course I didn’t say Gaza (the enclave) was the ‘whole of Palestine’.
Sorry if you think I was being patronising you are simply wrong to suggest that this is not the Lukid Party’s policy
Which just goes to show that every country has their f***ing idiots. The settlers need to be booted out of Gaza and left to the Palestinians.When I have the time I'll find the BBC report on the statements but here's Reuters to start with :
just to clarify - and not trying to be patronising but there aren’t any Jewish settlers in Gaza - not since they were cleared in 2005 under Ariel Sharon’s Disengagement Policy of Gaza.Which just goes to show that every country has their f***ing idiots. The settlers need to be booted out of Gaza and left to the Palestinians.
You are correct and I’m wrong ( not for the first time and certainly not the last). I meant the West Bank.just to clarify - and not trying to be patronising but there aren’t any Jewish settlers in Gaza - not since they were cleared in 2005 under Ariel Sharon’s Disengagement Policy of Gaza.
Every Country certainly doesn’t have an illegal occupying force attempting to annex land by killing innocent civilians and commandeering their homes. The settlers in the Occupied West Bank are not just ‘idiots’ ( they are) but they are also part of a concerted settlement expansion policy by the Netanyahu Government - no one will boot them out - least of all the current Israeli Government. It’s doubtful the Israeli Government will even concede any land claimed by the settlements in the West Bank as part of a peace plan either.
There seems to be quite an entrenched view in some quarters, that the West Bank is a legitimate part of Israel. I guess when a country has occupied land for a generation, built homes and set up businesses on it, it becomes harder to convince subsequent generations that this wasn’t their land in the first place
From what I heard on the wireless (5Live) from a defensive expert, it seems Iran had given prior detailed warning on what was going to happen. The operation to bring down the weapons was vast, complex and needed a lot of organisation and planning to reach a success rate of 99%.I’m not convinced Iran had hoped to achieve anything more than spread fear and terror of potential escalation with such a limited retaliation.
Pretty much this. Iran had to be seen to be doing something, but they have no interest in starting a full scale war, Biden has no interest in one either. Israel get to claim the "win", Iran makes it point and I suspect that Netanyahu's conversations with Biden may become slightly more tetchy.From what I heard on the wireless (5Live) from a defensive expert, it seems Iran had given prior detailed warning on what was going to happen. The operation to bring down the weapons was vast, complex and needed a lot of organisation and planning to reach a success rate of 99%.
It’s probable that the allies knew how many weapons were being sent over, launch sites and launch times. Pretty smart by Iran and I’m convinced that they don’t want an escalation and were happy that there were no casualties that would have meant a military response was certain.
Note that the U.N, U.S and U.K are all calling for de-escalation. If the allies were not given hugely detailed forewarnings of this and there had been casualties, I suspect the U.S would be up for some revenge strikes on Iran.
Spot on - that was my thinking entirely.From what I heard on the wireless (5Live) from a defensive expert, it seems Iran had given prior detailed warning on what was going to happen. The operation to bring down the weapons was vast, complex and needed a lot of organisation and planning to reach a success rate of 99%.
It’s probable that the allies knew how many weapons were being sent over, launch sites and launch times. Pretty smart by Iran and I’m convinced that they don’t want an escalation and were happy that there were no casualties that would have meant a military response was certain.
Note that the U.N, U.S and U.K are all calling for de-escalation. If the allies were not given hugely detailed forewarnings of this and there had been casualties, I suspect the U.S would be up for some revenge strikes on Iran.
You get the distinct feeling that both sides are now just lobbing symbolic gesture amounts of weaponry at each other. Middle East equivalent of opposing football fans luzzing rubber matting at each other in Brighton station. Long may it lastBoth Israel and Iran now downplaying Israel’s attack last night suggesting that diplomacy in the region is having an impact on both Countries for the time being. A stepping back from the precipice for now or at least the rhetoric is less escalatory.
Yes, certainly seems like it - bizarre way to de-escalate - retaliate with less and less weapons until they stop - bit of a risky strategy though!You get the distinct feeling that both sides are now just lobbing symbolic gesture amounts of weaponry at each other. Middle East equivalent of opposing football fans luzzing rubber matting at each other in Brighton station. Long may it last
There seems to be quite an entrenched view in some quarters, that the West Bank is a legitimate part of Israel. I guess when a country has occupied land for a generation, built homes and set up businesses on it, it becomes harder to convince subsequent generations that this wasn’t their land in the first place