aolstudios
Well-known member
You saying that doesn't make it so.It’s not a matter of opinion whatsoever. There’s truth and and there’s fiction.
The truth is the level of antisemitism in the Labour Party was hugely exaggerated.
Fact.
Fact
You saying that doesn't make it so.It’s not a matter of opinion whatsoever. There’s truth and and there’s fiction.
The truth is the level of antisemitism in the Labour Party was hugely exaggerated.
Fact.
Blah blahYou saying that doesn't make it so.
Fact
Blah blah
It's a bit more nuanced than that in my mind and I've read deeply around the subject.Corbyn was correct though. The scale of antisemitism was hugely exaggerated.
Does not make him a good leader but he’s right about that.
Such heavy wording. Anti Zionist I am but consider Labour support of the UK sending arms to kill Gazans and allow Israel's Far Right Netanhayu to do and kill as he pleases worse than racist.Why are you ignoring the independent EHRC report? Labour became a safe haven for racist scum under Corbyn.
Such heavy wording. Anti Zionist I am but consider Labour support of the UK sending arms to kill Gazans and allow Israel's Far Right Netanhayu to do and kill as he pleases worse than racist.
Leaseholders are not tenants. The contractors were unreliable and failed to complete the work in some cases.Well after that interlude, let's get back to Lambeth council. Forcing tenants to sign NDA's to get money repaid ?, that can't be Labour, a party for the people can it ?
A London council has been forcing residents into silence as a condition of them receiving money owed to them for building work and services they had been overcharged for - in some cases by tens of thousands of pounds.
Lambeth Council was asked by the BBC how many leaseholders it had asked to sign confidentiality clauses or non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) over a period of five years. It said 136 residents had entered into confidentiality agreements.
The Labour-run council has paid out nearly £1.6m in building works refunds to these residents, at an average of more than £11,500 per case. Leaseholders have told the BBC how they were refunded after being charged for shoddy work to their homes - and sometimes for work that never took place at all.
Lambeth Council refunded £1.5m to 'gagged' leaseholders
A council has been forcing residents into silence as a condition of them receiving money owed to them.www.bbc.co.uk
Mmm the below from the Leasehold Advisory ServiceLeaseholders are not tenants. The contractors were unreliable and failed to complete the work in some cases.
We asked the council why it legally prevents people from telling others about their refunds and it said this was "to avoid other leaseholders from using arguments made in separate and unrelated disputes. This enables the council to handle disputes on a case-by-case basis.
No, I owned a property ie with a mortgage that was leasehold. Then Kirkless council decided to sell the leases to owners in our road, so the majority of us became freeholders.Mmm the below from the Leasehold Advisory Service
Leaseholder. A leaseholder is someone who owns a property on a lease, typically for 99, 125 or 999 years. The length of the lease decreases year by year until it eventually runs out. A leaseholder is also called a tenant, but this should not be confused with short-term agreements.
I guess they are technically tenants not necessarily tenants of the council
Well after that interlude, let's get back to Lambeth council. Forcing tenants to sign NDA's to get money repaid ?, that can't be Labour, a party for the people can it ?
A London council has been forcing residents into silence as a condition of them receiving money owed to them for building work and services they had been overcharged for - in some cases by tens of thousands of pounds.
Lambeth Council was asked by the BBC how many leaseholders it had asked to sign confidentiality clauses or non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) over a period of five years. It said 136 residents had entered into confidentiality agreements.
The Labour-run council has paid out nearly £1.6m in building works refunds to these residents, at an average of more than £11,500 per case. Leaseholders have told the BBC how they were refunded after being charged for shoddy work to their homes - and sometimes for work that never took place at all.
Lambeth Council refunded £1.5m to 'gagged' leaseholders
A council has been forcing residents into silence as a condition of them receiving money owed to them.www.bbc.co.uk
But he only started the thread to "balance out the Tory one!" After all they're all as bad as each other right?Your desperation all over this thread is making Sunak's last few weeks campaigning look positively composed
Forcing people is a very emotive way of describing legal agreements. Nobody made them accept their compensation.Well after that interlude, let's get back to Lambeth council. Forcing tenants to sign NDA's to get money repaid ?, that can't be Labour, a party for the people can it ?
A London council has been forcing residents into silence as a condition of them receiving money owed to them for building work and services they had been overcharged for - in some cases by tens of thousands of pounds.
Lambeth Council was asked by the BBC how many leaseholders it had asked to sign confidentiality clauses or non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) over a period of five years. It said 136 residents had entered into confidentiality agreements.
The Labour-run council has paid out nearly £1.6m in building works refunds to these residents, at an average of more than £11,500 per case. Leaseholders have told the BBC how they were refunded after being charged for shoddy work to their homes - and sometimes for work that never took place at all.
Lambeth Council refunded £1.5m to 'gagged' leaseholders
A council has been forcing residents into silence as a condition of them receiving money owed to them.www.bbc.co.uk
Blimey, give them a chance to get the keys to the Home Office first.Still no solution? Haven't heard.
Could Labour stop the boats?
Labour has no proposal to remove migrants arriving by unauthorised routes to a “safe third country” - so does Keir Starmer’s plan to deal with “illegal” migration stack up?
Let us imagine a small boat of asylum seeking migrants arrives on the Kent coast next month. Aboard are men, women and children from the countries which typically make up arrivals coming across the channel.
Half of the passengers have come from countries so unstable there is no chance they can be returned: Afghanistan, Iran, Eritrea, Syria, Iraq and Sudan. Almost all come from states with which the UK has no agreement to return those not granted asylum.
Answers on a fag packet.
No desperation here, just posting for fun and reactions, your oh so holy replies make me smile.Your desperation all over this thread is making Sunak's last few weeks campaigning look positively composed
….. the response to almost everything post 4th July.Blimey, give them a chance to get the keys to the Home Office first.
Thanks to the massive backlog of asylum processing, it will take a while to sort out the queues.
That’s strange, it’s only 1st today.….. the response to almost everything post 4th July.
That’s strange, it’s only 1st today.
Why send them back when you can just give them a house and a job in the NHS , problem solved , not rocket science is it ?Still no solution? Haven't heard.
Could Labour stop the boats?
Labour has no proposal to remove migrants arriving by unauthorised routes to a “safe third country” - so does Keir Starmer’s plan to deal with “illegal” migration stack up?
Let us imagine a small boat of asylum seeking migrants arrives on the Kent coast next month. Aboard are men, women and children from the countries which typically make up arrivals coming across the channel.
Half of the passengers have come from countries so unstable there is no chance they can be returned: Afghanistan, Iran, Eritrea, Syria, Iraq and Sudan. Almost all come from states with which the UK has no agreement to return those not granted asylum.
Answers on a fag packet.