Unusual I would agree but matey boy in the Czech Republic seems to have some sort of obsession with another bloke w@nking. That is even stranger ..... maybe it's something to do with him being an ex-sailor.
[Politics] Brexit
- Thread starter KingstonSeagull
- Start date
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Unusual I would agree but matey boy in the Czech Republic seems to have some sort of obsession with another bloke w@nking. That is even stranger ..... maybe it's something to do with him being an ex-sailor.
You seem to be struggling with a fairly simple concept.
The published agreement is not binding because, as has been repeatedly said by both sides, nothing is agreed until everything is agreed (which includes any financial commitments and the details of the trade deal).
Once everything is agreed, that will result in a legal and binding agreement (which will clearly be legally enforceable) which will incorporate some or all of the recently published discussions.
Without that final agreement, then the present document is meaningless and certainly not legally binding.
Not too tricky to grasp, is it?
ManOfSussex
We wunt be druv
Tell David Davis then - though he seems to be quite simple himself.
- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,772
Anyway, enough of these distractions.
Now it's become a lot clearer what the current Government's plan for Brexit is, which of the 3 options does everyone favour ?
1/ Abide by all EU regulations, No borders and continue onto the next step of negotiating a Trade Deal
2/ No Agreement to EU Regulations, Introduce Borders (Ireland/NI or NI/Britain ?) No Trade Deal and WTO
3/ Some sort of Backtracking - Revoke Article 50 ?
4/ Try and change the Government (although I'm not sure that changes the 3 options above)
Now it's become a lot clearer what the current Government's plan for Brexit is, which of the 3 options does everyone favour ?
1/ Abide by all EU regulations, No borders and continue onto the next step of negotiating a Trade Deal
2/ No Agreement to EU Regulations, Introduce Borders (Ireland/NI or NI/Britain ?) No Trade Deal and WTO
3/ Some sort of Backtracking - Revoke Article 50 ?
4/ Try and change the Government (although I'm not sure that changes the 3 options above)
Last edited:
daveinprague
New member
Maybe its because I consider him to be wanker.
Your use of 'obession' is a bit desperate isnt it? Maybe youre a wanker as well.
Yes, yes, yes - we get it - you have nothing intelligent to add to the Brexit debate so instead constantly mention him 'w@nking' in every reply you make to him ( have a look because it's in black and white above this post ). You might not agree with his opinions but at least try an be an intelligent person and counter his arguments with something other than 'you're a wanker'. Oh, yes I am a wanker ..... unlike you I'm not a liar and suggest I've not wanked since by teenage years .... unless of course you're suggesting you're so slow that your adolescent years were your thirties !
daveinprague
New member
Cool story
I'll take that as 'I'm too stupid to add anything worthwhile to the Brexit debate' then. No real surprise there.
daveinprague
New member
Take it how you like. What could I say about Brexit other than already interated? Its a **** up. Being negotiated by ****ups. Supported by guess..?
So you do care then?
Go on then, which accounts do you think are my second, thirds etc? Or is this yet more rubbish you are inventing?
Quite. He keeps digging this hole deeper and deeper.
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
The Merry Prankster
Pactum serva
“Expectation” is pretty meaningless. I don’t thing anyone had grasped the anger/disenfranchisement of the north.
nicko31
Well-known member
A relative of my just sold a house in Burnley for £60k and bought it in 2003 for £53k, so after inflation its actually gone down in value.
It says it all about the huge divide and huge structural problem, leaving the EU is barking up the wrong tree though.
Lincoln Imp
Well-known member
- Feb 2, 2009
- 5,964
I have absolutely no problems with immigrants coming to the UK, I don't care if bananas are straight or bendy, I couldn't care less what colour our passports are either. I voted to leave because of this:
You voted because of something that was said by an opposition politician in Germany 18 months after the date of the vote?
Whatever Schulz's ability to give his dream wheels (I'll leave HT to comment on internal German politics) any Briton confident of his country would see a suggestion like this as an opportunity for the UK to assume the natural leadership of that whole swathe of countries - most EU members I'd hazard - opposed to a USE. Someone with little faith would want to do a runner of course.
nicko31
Well-known member
I have absolutely no problems with immigrants coming to the UK, I don't care if bananas are straight or bendy, I couldn't care less what colour our passports are either. I voted to leave because of this:
And within days...
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...europe-ahead-of-coalition-talks-idUSKBN1E30KH
vegster
Sanity Clause
- May 5, 2008
- 28,273
I have absolutely no problems with immigrants coming to the UK, I don't care if bananas are straight or bendy, I couldn't care less what colour our passports are either. I voted to leave because of this:
How prescient of you. However, this was discussed last week on this thread. The fact is that this was Martin Shulz's idea floated at his party conference. As you will be well aware , at party conferences all sorts of ideas are put forward and discussed, most of which never become a party policy let alone a government one.
If you really want something to worry about look to Poland and the erosion of democratic free speech and the independent judiciary.
Had she formed a strong and stable government yet?