symanticsThey didn't though, did they? They just chose to place their vote with someone else. That is not the same as voting against something.
symanticsThey didn't though, did they? They just chose to place their vote with someone else. That is not the same as voting against something.
They didn't though, did they? They just chose to place their vote with someone else. That is not the same as voting against something.
Very deluded comments. Even the secretary of state for leaving the European Union can make them - https://inews.co.uk/essentials/news...-trading-area-10-times-the-size-of-the-earth/
wtf... scratch head ...uh uh uh ....what da faarrk.
Youre just playing at semantics there.symantics
Youre just playing at semantics there.
the istanbul peninsula has been the bridge to europe since people started wiping their arses with paper.....the istanbul peninsula will continue to be so until the bridges are collapsed , which might not be long the way things are going ...you can be as liberal and whiffy as you like but if it looks , smells , sounds , walks and talks like a turd.....the fact is , it's obviously a turd.
What was wrong with that comment? How many people who didn't vote Tory voted UKIP? I don't think they were anti-Tory given they got their second best result.
IMF has slashed its growth forecast for the UK for next year by 0.9% due to the EU result, and says it could darken further if process to leave is more painful than expected. - Sky News report
I now wait the deluge of stop being negative, its only a temporary blip, its worth it anyway - The facts speak for themselves
if you're putting all your eggs in the IMF basket then good luck to you. They've been wrong so many times it's not even a joke.
Theresa 'Brexit means Brexit' May is now saying article 50 won't be triggered this year:
http://www.theguardian.com/politics...irst-legal-opposition-to-brexit-in-high-court
I wonder how long it will be until it is triggered, by the time it is we should probably need to have another referendum as so much time will have passed!
Scotland could leave the UK only as the result of a referendum and the timing of any referendum is essentially in the gift of Westminster. For this reason alone, I think you are right - unless Sturgeon can think of a way to make May agree to a second Scottish referendum (and the SNP win it) before the conclusion of the exit process then Scotland will have to leave with the rest of the UK. I can't think of such a way myself. Your use of the word 'laughable' was as unnecessary as it was predictable though. On your second point, I am not so sure. The EU might want to bend over backwards to support a Scottish accession and such an accession might not be the disaster you predict. Super civilised Edinburgh might attract financial institutions from the City of London and the rest of Scotland could be of interest to the 70-odd per cent of FDI companies in the UK that cite our membership of the EU as being an important reason for them being here.
IMF has slashed its growth forecast for the UK for next year by 0.9% due to the EU result, and says it could darken further if process to leave is more painful than expected. - Sky News report
I now wait the deluge of stop being negative, its only a temporary blip, its worth it anyway - The facts speak for themselves
Theresa 'Brexit means Brexit' May is now saying article 50 won't be triggered this year:
http://www.theguardian.com/politics...irst-legal-opposition-to-brexit-in-high-court
I wonder how long it will be until it is triggered, by the time it is we should probably need to have another referendum as so much time will have passed!
Thankfully we have you to put us on the right track because we did not realise that the price of leaving the EU superstate and it's rules and regs and cost would mean a bit of hardship at first.Leavers don't believe in economics as a general rule, sadly.
Thankfully we have you to put us on the right track because we did not realise that the price of leaving the EU would mean hardship
Leavers don't believe in economics as a general rule, sadly.
Keep telling yourself that. I personally prefer not to pigeonhole people who disagree with me, is divisive and false and ultimately only serves one purpose-to make you feel more secure in your own opinions.