Dandyman
In London village.
Don't be silly DKM. That's entirely different. The Irish are WHITE therefore count as English.
I though they were GREEN or in the case of Nord Iron ORANGE?
Don't be silly DKM. That's entirely different. The Irish are WHITE therefore count as English.
britain had no MASS MIGRATION between the norman conquest and the 1950's, the jews/huguenots etc whle moving here in significant numbers cannot be classed as mass migration, we can no more be classed as a mongrel nation than any other european country and i resent the implication, though you can class yourself as a mongrel if you wish.
what about it ? can you show me RELIABLE FIGURES ?What about Irish labour?
whites first ,blacks came later!!
Keep up,
Indians (Arawak) first, THEN Whites, then Blacks followed by Chinese, Indians (from India+East/West Pakistan quite a few around partition I believe, so, technically India) and so forth...
... and that's just Jamaica, a tiny Island with little to offer the world in natural resources, let alone The West Indies, Caribbean, South America, World...
... there really is no place for the BNP is there, or any of their equivalent in any country.
at what expense??Get this man in Parliament sharpish!
Indeed, we go full circle back to Nick Griffin,Migration of Ibero-Celts, Romans, Jutes, Angles, Vikings,Palantines, Dutch (1688 onwards) and others is probably difficult to judge in terms of numbers but linguists would probalby point to clear evidence of their impact on both our language and palce names.
the word '(unt' is Germanic in origin.
at what expense??
hating someone for the colour of their skin is stupid,and i certainly dont, but anyone who claims immigration from places such as bangladesh, with a culture and way of life so totally alien to ours , has been a success, is absolutely f***ing barking, and im pretty sure they wont have ever spent a great deal of time living in an area with a high concentration of these immigrants, you only have to look at the almost total lack of integration or engagement with the indigenous( can we please refrain from crass " no such thing as indigenous english " comments) population , and noticebly higher unemployment rates for this to become apparent.Don't be silly DKM. That's entirely different. The Irish are WHITE therefore count as English.
or according to Wikipedia Irish
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griffin_(surname)
Perhaps he would like to join my family and I back in the Emerald Isle?
these figures are all estimated and from wikipedia etc ,they are massaged to suit the agenda of people such as yourself who DRONE on about equality and society being inclusive , and by the way,as far as i am concerned they are english, even though ferdinand is so f***ing dim , that if brains were made of dynamite he wouldnt have enough to part his hair.
"knuckle draggers" what a convenient label , BNP a " insignificant party " could come back to haunt you those comments .
hating someone for the colour of their skin is stupid,and i certainly dont, but anyone who claims immigration from places such as bangladesh, with a culture and way of life so totally alien to ours , has been a success, is absolutely f***ing barking, and im pretty sure they wont have ever spent a great deal of time living in an area with a high concentration of these immigrants, you only have to look at the almost total lack of integration or engagement with the indigenous( can we please refrain from crass " no such thing as indigenous english " comments) population , and noticebly higher unemployment rates for this to become apparent.
at some pointOh I think it will
these figures are all estimated and from wikipedia etc ,they are massaged to suit the agenda of people such as yourself who DRONE on about equality and society being inclusive....
They are all estimated (although none of them were taken from Wikipedia) as there were no accurate figures at that time. They're informed guesses though - not plucked out of thin air.
But you also stated that there was no mass immigration before the last century. If you're stating that all the figures are suspect that surely your statement is suspect too?
fair point , we will have to agree to disagreeThey are all estimated (although none of them were taken from Wikipedia) as there were no accurate figures at that time. They're informed guesses though - not plucked out of thin air.
But you also stated that there was no mass immigration before the last century. If you're stating that all the figures are suspect that surely your statement is suspect too?
typical politics, figures and percentages strong action is what's requiredThey are all estimated (although none of them were taken from Wikipedia) as there were no accurate figures at that time. They're informed guesses though - not plucked out of thin air.
But you also stated that there was no mass immigration before the last century. If you're stating that all the figures are suspect that surely your statement is suspect too?
its all about intergration............ some how i don't see a lot of that happening??
that is so true, some of the rose tinted brigade who have never gone outside their front door would disagree thoughAs Someone who lives in a so called Multi Cultural city. There is very limited integration. People are tribal always have been always will be.
that is so true, some of the rose tinted brigade who have never gone outside their front door would disagree though