Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

BNP Leader Nick Griffin Claims Theo Walcott And Rio Ferdinand Are Not English









Dave the OAP

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
46,762
at home
we were all black africans from the rift valley originally, according to that totty on Sunday night
 
Last edited:




Jan 30, 2008
31,981
"I might go and live in Jamaica, but I could never be Jamaican because I'm not black". Campbell resisted the obvious question about where Griffin thought the black people in Jamaica had come from, and simply let him talk himself deeper into a hole.



Quite.

Black Jamaicans aren’t native to Jamaica , this bloke is a fooking idiot. Britain has been subject to mass migration for thousands of years, we are mongrel nation always have been always will be.[/QUOTE]whites first ,blacks came later!!
 






Insel affe

HellBilly
Feb 23, 2009
24,368
Brighton factually.....
we were all black africans from the rift valley originally


If you belive the left wing :lolol:

there must be older bones elsewhere, maybe under the sea or somewhere.We are only speculating with what we have found so far. science and historian type chaps change there minds every few years. We will never know the truth me thinks.
 








Edward Seaga was Prime Minister of Jamaica, who won the 1980 election with an overwhelming majority. But was he "Jamaican"?

He was born in Boston, Massachusetts. His parents were of Lebanese and Scottish descent.

I'm only asking.
 


Heffle Gull

JCL since 1979
Feb 5, 2004
891
Heathfield
The bloke's a muppett.

The surname Griffin isn't even English...It's believed to originate either from Germanic "grifan" meaning to snatch or grasp or from the Welsh name "Gruffyd"

So perhaps, in the spirit of the BNP, we should send him away to Germany!

or according to Wikipedia Irish

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griffin_(surname)

Perhaps he would like to join my family and I back in the Emerald Isle?
 




bushy said:
I have well over 600 years of traceable British heritage on one side of my family

How does that work? There was no such country as "Britain" 600 years ago.

And 600 years of heritage? That's at least 18 generations - well over a quarter of a million direct ancestors. Every single one of them "traceable British"? I'd be amazed if that was the case.
 


Pavilionaire

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
31,278
The BNP are politically insignificant and the only reason they get as much airtime and column inches as they do is because, rightly or wrongly, they have a different take and different policies from the 3 "vanilla" main parties.

If Labour, Tories and Libs REALLY want to see the BNP off they should come up with their own radical policies to what is a pretty dire situation we're now in. As long as politics is bland and no one wants to rock the boat the BNP will get airtime, regardless of how popular they are or aren't.
 








Dave the OAP

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
46,762
at home
Edward Seaga was Prime Minister of Jamaica, who won the 1980 election with an overwhelming majority. But was he "Jamaican"?

He was born in Boston, Massachusetts. His parents were of Lebanese and Scottish descent.

I'm only asking.

Obama's family are Kenyan aren't they?
 


User removed 4

New member
May 9, 2008
13,331
Haywards Heath
Indeed. Bushy's completely wrong on this (isn't amazing how many people who drone about England's heritage are woefully ignorant of English history?)

Immigration from Ireland to England in the years after 1848 alone is estimated at between 500k to 1m (between 2.5 and 5 percent of England's population). That would be today's equivalent of 1.25m and 2.5m over five years - that sounds like a mass migration to me.

There were some 50,000 Huguenots who came to England after the revocation of the Edict of Nantes (my ancestors among them), more than 1 percent of the then population. Again that's more than 500,000 people coming within a couple of years in today's terms. Another mass migration by any standards.

And that of course doesn't take into account the Dutch (mentioned above), the Flemings in the Middle Ages, the Scottish after the clearances.
these figures are all estimated and from wikipedia etc ,they are massaged to suit the agenda of people such as yourself who DRONE on about equality and society being inclusive , and by the way,as far as i am concerned they are english, even though ferdinand is so f***ing dim , that if brains were made of dynamite he wouldnt have enough to part his hair.
 
Last edited:


Dandyman

In London village.
I have well over 600 years of traceable British heritage on one side of my family and almost 200 years on the other side so I wouldn’t class myself a mongrel in the slightest but I don’t see people like myself as the only true British people.
I think once you are established in a country over a couple of generations then you are British no matter what colour or creed you are or where you or your relatives were born.



I'm not disputing that, what i do resent is ill informed statements classing us a "mongrel nation" due to "thousands of years of mass migration", which is complete rubbish.[/QUOTE]


Depends on what you mean by "mass migration" - total numbers or numbers in relation to existing population? For example the 1911 census puts the number of Jews at over 100,000 and the number of Hugenots settling in the Uk is estimated at 50,000 Huguenot Society - Huguenot History

The Hugenot influence on textiles is still seen in the names of several major firms such as Courtaulds and Dormeuil (although the ownership has changed, of course).

Migration of Ibero-Celts, Romans, Jutes, Angles, Vikings,Palantines, Dutch (1688 onwards) and others is probably difficult to judge in terms of numbers but linguists would probalby point to clear evidence of their impact on both our language and palce names.
 




Dandyman

In London village.




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here