Postman Pat
Well-known member
Where's the water slide??
I guess the travolator that deposits fans into the East Stand Upper will be hidden from view?
Will have to wait for the report to be released to know the reasons. Could be a technical issue, or could be something more fundamental with the design.
View attachment 72084View attachment 72085View attachment 72086
Will have to wait for the report to be released to know the reasons. Could be a technical issue, or could be something more fundamental with the design.
View attachment 72084View attachment 72085View attachment 72086
Surely it is just the Planning Officers who have recommended refusal.They can be overruled by the Councillors ...?
its more likely that they are worried more conferences weddings and other events would move to the Amex .its better than building another out of town shopping centre.Picked it up from NSC? Planning applications are meat and drink to local newspapers, they'd have been all over this.
I'm bemused by this idea that hotels are non-viable: aren't we often being told there's a shortage of hotel rooms in Brighton?
Considering the imagination and design elements that went into the stadium and training centre, I'd have thought something a tad more imaginative might have gone into the hotel and treatment unit.
I know they're supposed to be more functional than aesthetic, but even so. It's the kind of place I'd expect to see Gareth Cheeseman turn up to.
Looks shit to me. I hope they're refusing permission because it's not aesthetically pleasing.
What's the problem?
It's a hotel...and it looks like a hotel.
What do they expect?
Sydney Opera House?
The hanging Gardens of Babylon?
That is not a planning consideration. The viability or otherwise of the project is purely a commercial consideration for the developer. The reference to any subsided required is also not a planning consideration.
Why?
One - it's not in her constituency
Two - she's not on the council - she's an MP
Three - the negotiations for the hotel started while the Green Party still led the council, and therefore were happy for the council to be partners in this project (insofar as they are the landowners)
Four - the council is not Green-led any more
Five - she totally approves of, and loves the stadium, and is a big supporter of AITC and what it seeks to achieve. Therefore it's not being an enormous leap of the imagination that a much-needed hotel and cancer-treating unit would be very much welcomed
Six - the recommendation to refuse is made by officers, not councillors. The largest number of councillors represent the Labour Party.
Ahh the Greens strike again ��
What's the problem?
It's a hotel...and it looks like a hotel.
What do they expect?
Sydney Opera House?
The hanging Gardens of Babylon?