So no boycotts or walk outs then? No concentrating on berating the owners instead of supporting the team? No abandonments of games?
We did all of these things to help get rid of our owners, so I don't think we can criticise.
I don't think it has become 'socially acceptable to publically lambast and discriminate against people because of their background and ubringing'.
However, in the context you specifically refer to -the background of our government (the cabinet is drawn from a wealthy elite and from a...
I'm mystified why they don't go for a shared ground. The opportunity is to build the best stadium in the country and they could light it blue/red as appropriate (like the Allianz Arena - allianz arena munich - Google Search). It could be amazing.
That old chestnut 'There was contact', eh? Is contact not allowed in the box then?
Please everyone repeating this phrase is just providing a charter for cheats. Banish it!
Ha, I looked through the whole thread to see if someone had mentioned Morgan and one response from the end you have!
So yes, I vote Simon Morgan. He was much better than Cullip and Butters and for that matter anyone else who played at CB for us before the Poyet era.
Don't disagree with that. But theres no contest as far as the original question is concerned. 2012 side much better, even if they could be improved withBennet and Murray.
Because of Bennett and Murray? Bennett would have been an asset in this division for sure, but Murray is in this division and last time I looked not tearing it up.
We were a great side in L1 and we're now a good side in the Championship. The standard is so much higher and the strengthening...
The 2012 side would win. Easily. Out of interest, for those who believe otherwise - where do you think the 2011 side would be now in the Championship? Automatic promotion places or comfortable play off places?
If you want harsh, how about this: Facebook riot calls earn men four-year jail terms amid sentencing outcry | UK news | The Guardian
2 idiots put up Facebook event inviting people to riot. No-one turns up and they get 4 YEARS.
It is harsh, but I have little sympathy really. It's about time people realised that you're subject to the same laws offline and as you are online. Everyone knows you can't go down the high street and stand on a sopabox espousing the type of offensive and racist views this numpty has, so why...
Are you not even a wee bit embarrassed to not understand one of the simplest websites on the internet? Whether you like it or not is one thing, but to not understand what you're looking at?! Facebook is much more complex, do you get that?
I don't read the Sun because they're a bunch of morally reprehensible charlatans who incite hatred and ruin people's lives in what they tenuously call 'the public interest'. I knew this before the Leveson inquiry, but that forum means everyone should know it now.
Everyone is free to buy or...
Riiiiight, so assuming that Gus did say that people who criticise Barnes don't understand football and IF we assume by 'criticise' he means give him grief at a game - then he's right, isn't he?