Back to the Barnes/Navarro debate...

[JCL666]

Your heading for some trouble now !!!

I think Nav played ok still dont see why he starts every game, as for barnes I swear he just walks around the pitch half the time, I rate him as highly as harley.

You really do post utter shit

 

[Kazenga <3]

 

[perseus]

Been said before, but no coincidence that our form has come about since Navs and Bridcutt have been playing together. Gives us more protection and gives the rest of the players a bit more freedom.

As for Barnes, was pretty good today, as he has been most of the season.

You could use the same argument to say it is when Navarro has been playing.

It seemed to me that Portsmouth got their players back very quickly. Most misplaced passes by Bridcutt could be put down to Portsmouth cutting out the obvious quick ball. Patience as Gus says.

I was impressed by the stamina of Will Buckley. he is the obvious winger to start. He seemed to be getting stronger as the game went on. But Kazenga turning into the channels and leaving Ben Haim for dead was most impressive.

 

[DarrenFreemansPerm]

For fucks sake

The both played ok. Why on earth people have a constant need to slag them off is beyond me.

As for "Bridcutt was poor"....

Ha, there was me thinking Bridcutt had his best game for a while. Some TREMENDOUS tackles today!

 

[Rugrat]

Neither were great but then they didn't have to be against totally cack opposition ... moving on to Blackpool, that'll be a test for both of 'em as no doubt they'll start

 

[Silent Bob]

Thought Barnes had a good game today. Probably better than the last couple (at home) in all round performance.


If Navarro has to play it shouldn't be in a two man midfield.

 

[DJ Leon]

Barnes had a good game. Navarro was decent enough. Both have been integral to this good run so are pretty much undroppable in my eyes.