Search results

I get your frustration but seriously... Working in personnel I have been through a number of hearings where the submissions ran into 2000 pages and we were not likely to lose millions if we got it wrong. Would you have been happy if the allegations had been on the back of a fag packet for ease?

The club appear to have tried to do this legally which is commenable but it appears to have come back and bit them so to speak. Like others I suspect gus will try to delay as much as possible, object to the disciplinary panel, grievance etc knowing that with each day the clubs need to settle...

People may like gus and think hd is the greatest thing since sliced bread, that is their right but to suggest he stays after this, well I find it strange. Whatever has caused this there is a rift between the board and gus that cant be repaired or papered over. The board that includes chairman...

When did you obtain access to the list of allegations and discuss witn board and gus to be able to make this judgement?

Not barber fc or poyet fc but possibly bloom fc since he who pays the piper...

I dont think anyone is saying that bloom cant make mistakes, but in the long run who is more important to the club. The owner ploughing millions of his own money into the club to keep it alive or a manager, good no doubt, but who would eventually leave. I know who I support, but that is not to...

The lma are paid to represent gus and as expected are doing so. They do not state that the club breeched its own policy in scheduling the meeting for today just that they felt it did not give them time to prepare. They asked for and eventually got the delay they wanted. Acas guildlines on...

Human nature I know but watch how opinion changes with each statement released, first by the club and then by the lma. Both sides are going to put the best case possible and yet opinions move from anti to pro gus. I would imagine the club feel they have a case and their actions with regards...

I am becoming more and more worried about the club and its prospects next season as each day passes. As a club we had made significant strides forward following the move to the Amex both on and off the pitch and the prospect of premiership football was a real and achievable target over the next...

No, he would have turned up and cleared his name I suggest.

no would not, wouldn't react either way

was fence but now out. Relationship between gus and board and no way back from that, for the good of next season we need it resolved now

I would say that the wording in the club statement is significant. Disputed legal dispute indicates the clubs legal team does not agree and final hearing again indicates the club will proceed with or without gus around. Either way it is having a negative effect on next season.

are you being serious? the club invited gus to a hearing to discuss possibly breeches of contract and gus did not show up on advice. Just because he did not show up does not make either party right. I would say the best way to prove you innocence would be to attend and defend the charges and...

Couple of points. The club have stated disputed legal reasons for not attending, clearly the clubs legal team do not agree he has valid reasons for non attendance. They have also stated final chance to attend. The club will at the next scheduled hearing make a decision based on the facts in...

Lots of people seem to be linking the offer with gus being innocent of all charges and a board error. Gus is still suspended and still has a hearing to attend. Once this is done we will know the rights and wrongs, not before. In my work place we will take a view with regards to payoffs. Yes we...

Couple of things. The club have not lifted the suspension and the hearing is monday, that suggests that they may still be a case to answer. Tannohad his lifted if you recall. Additionally who knows what the offer was. Perhaps it was to accept a reduced payment from him for resignation or a...

Difficult one , but since I believe it has gone to far with gus, I am going for vicente

You would question the sanity of those in charge if he was appointed.

So in your view it is okay for gus to wait on a payout from the club whilst his agent has talks with other clubs for him to move to in breech of the contract the club is expected to honour and meet its financial obligations?