Also just seems like a really sensible way of moving forwards with the scheme. Thameslink should have been trialling it anyway, so both sides get a win.
I think you could certainly argue that it's not always a free choice, even in this country. However, for many, as you say, it genuinely is a free choice, and they should not be penalised because some women are forced to wear it.
I'm quite happy to be honest, and am happy we don't buy players for the sake of buying players any more. People always moaned about Arsenal and how they weren't willing to spend money, but I respected them for being a club that always performed well and was well run financially. Now they have...
The crazy stat is the Football League stats. In total £200m has been spent in the Football League, which comes at about £2.7m per club. Except it doesn't, because £120m of that comes from Norwich, Villa and Newcastle. That's ludicrous!
That's the thing isn't it? Forest seem to have had a stockpile of striker for quite a few seasons now, and yet they finished 16th last season. Derby have loads, and are probably worse flops in the play-offs than us. It's not about having loads of strikers, it's about bringing in the right...
Really? They have got in a new CB, which we needed. They got in a new LB, again which we needed. We have retained one, hopefully both, of the central midfielders who were pretty critical to our success last season, which you'd imagine the recruitment team had a hand in. They brought back Glenn...
It's just hard to take your complaints seriously when it seems that no decision the club makes is the right one. We do need a striker, and it's frustrating that we haven't got one. Will it consign us to mid-table or signal a huge dip in quality? Probably not. Does that excuse the club? No. Does...