Or so the YouGov poll says .............
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...back-a-ban-on-burqa-by-two-to-one-poll-finds/
Good. The government should act on it.
Or so the YouGov poll says .............
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...back-a-ban-on-burqa-by-two-to-one-poll-finds/
Why? It is not a religious decision but a cultural one. It's a free choice and we are a free Country. They should be allowed to wear what they want.
Who said he defines himself through his religion? And who are you to decide he isn't moderate just because his wife wears a burkha? You don't even know him.
It's also my free choice if i wish to wear a balaclava. How do you think that would go down if i walked around a busy town, into a bank wearing one?
You wouldn't be allowed to wear a balaclava in a bank, and you shouldn't be allowed to wear a burqa in there either.It's also my free choice if i wish to wear a balaclava. How do you think that would go down if i walked around a busy town, into a bank wearing one?
The bloke behind me is a muslim, a sound bloke, and very moderate. His wife chooses to wear a burkha, he doesn't care whether she does one way or the other. It is indeed a free choice.
It's also my free choice if i wish to wear a balaclava. How do you think that would go down if i walked around a busy town, into a bank wearing one?
You wouldn't be allowed to wear a balaclava in a bank, and you shouldn't be allowed to wear a burqa in there either.
But if you want to wear a balaclava on a hot summers day in the street, you fill your boots. You'd look very odd though, much as women wearing burqas do (IMO).
Eh? I merely said he was a Muslim, in order to make the point that his wife wears a burqa.YOU defined him by his religion and YOU labelled him moderate not me.
So why do you define him as moderate, what part of his religious life is moderate ??
A back pack and a balaclava, or just a balaclava?If a bloke got on a packed train in London with back pack and balaclava on you wouldn't bat an eye lid?
I wouldnt lend the term moderate to any colleagues from any other religion that so demonstrably show their allegiance to their religion.
To be honest,some of them are so hideously ugly they do us an enormous favour covering up.Wish a few more would!
YOU defined him by his religion and YOU labelled him moderate not me.
So why do you define him as moderate, what part of his religious life is moderate ??
A back pack and a balaclava, or just a balaclava?
Why would I not trust what he says any more than anybody else?Or so he says....
Sorry, what was your point again?Either....
I think we also need to credit our security services. I have no idea how they manage to stop there being more attacks.I can't say I've got strong opinions on this subject one way or the other. There are good arguments on both sides. I would just err on the side of caution simply because our tolerance as a nation hasn't done us much harm.
When you consider the number of illegal wars we have waded into compared to the number of domestic terror attacks from fundamentalists as a response, I'd say we do alright, and that is largely down to the tolerance of our people IMO.
Why would I not trust what he says any more than anybody else?
You may be asked to remove it in a bank, the same way as motorcyclists are asked to remove their helmets. That's not quite the same thing as banning it completely though is it? And I DO walk round Brighton wearing a ski mask in the winter. No one cowers in doorways expecting me to shoot them with a sawn-off shotgun. Simster's analysis is spot-on,It's also my free choice if i wish to wear a balaclava. How do you think that would go down if i walked around a busy town, into a bank wearing one?