wouldn't surprise me if he became fit and available 1 second after the transfer window shuts....Ferguson injured for some weeks more per update on club website
wouldn't surprise me if he became fit and available 1 second after the transfer window shuts....Ferguson injured for some weeks more per update on club website
Or the Saturday after he’s loaned outwouldn't surprise me if he became fit and available 1 second after the transfer window shuts....
Always assumed that is the plan - starters put it in for first hour or so then we put on like-for-like subs to do the same.If, as suggested, Fabian is over working the players fitness in training I see little sign of it working on the pitch. Our players often seemed tuckered by about 60 minutes .
However, to counter my own opinion we have scored 11 goals after the eighty minutes mark in 23 games - is that good or par for the course ?
That's exactly what I thought it would be at the start of the season. A fairly like for like, two front 4's, with everyone getting loads of game time. It's a really exciting idea.Always assumed that is the plan - starters put it in for first hour or so then we put on like-for-like subs to do the same.
I think the same as you. From the outside, none of the explanations on their own make any sense. I hope the club aren't just putting this down to luck. Given the scale of the issue, i'd like the think there is a full scale review in progress.We’ve had these injuries over several seasons and under different head coaches. This suggests to me that we’re not over-coaching.
Similarly, without inside knowledge of what’s going on at the training ground, we don’t know if pitches have been relaid or replaced with artificial pitches etc. Unless they have, we can probably discount the training environment.
Is it a blind spot in our data approach? is the reason we’re able to get these players that others are discounting them partly on them being potentially injury prone?
Is it just bad luck? It seems to be ongoing and happening consistently, you’d think the club would be looking closely at how this keeps happening.
If these injuries were all occurring e.g. during a particular drill, you’d hope that would be being picked up on and the drill replaced with something less destructive. Similarly if they were all occurring at the end of training sessions, you’d think that we’d switch to shorter, more intense, training sessions.
I’d just like to know that somebody at the club is investigating how/why this keeps happening, and is looking for a solution.
So you're saying that he's not injured and was dropped?he was due on the bench on sat and then had a bust up so was removed.
there aren't any teams that "barely get an injury" and many if not most get multiple injuiries and several teams this year who have had just as bad a injury list (Brentford, Wolves, Spurs etc) .The pitches there are Cat A, state of the art.
It surely can't be that.
There are also loads of teams who play an intense pressing style and play more games than we do and barely get an injury
what explanations ? Dunk having a recurrence of a calf injury he had a few weeks ago ? Pedro having a twisted ankle ? Igor having to have (like Welbeck in past seasons) an op on his hamstring, Ferdi having a toe operation ? Why do they not make sense ?I think the same as you. From the outside, none of the explanations on their own make any sense.
The numbers. The numbers don't make sense. Sure in your approach if you look at each instance in isolation then each makes sense. But there's a number of injuries over more than a season here and that's what I think the club should be looking at. I would be amazed if they were just sitting back and concluding straight away it's just bad luckwhat explanations ? Dunk having a recurrence of a calf injury he had a few weeks ago ? Pedro having a twisted ankle ? Igor having to have (like Welbeck in past seasons) an op on his hamstring, Ferdi having a toe operation ? Why do they not make sense ?
And I really don't care about f***ing Brentford. We've got to look after what we're doing, as do they.there aren't any teams that "barely get an injury" and many if not most get multiple injuiries and several teams this year who have had just as bad a injury list (Brentford, Wolves, Spurs etc) .
That argument falls down when Liverpool currently only have three. Is there a more high intensity team who play more games?Players are playing too many games. The style of most football clubs has moved to high intensity so more injuries occur. It isn't just us at all it's loads of teams. I am certain the club will be looking into it and that our new medical team is all part of that.
Indeed - I was trying to find the stats on running distances etc, but even without these it is obvious that certain teams play in a pretty intense way - and whose players have significantly more game time. I'm sure the club are dedicating a lot of time and effort to this....and there is probably a large dose of bad luck at play.That argument falls down when Liverpool currently only have three. Is there a more high intensity team who play more games?
good reasoning, Sir/M.We’ve had these injuries over several seasons and under different head coaches. This suggests to me that we’re not over-coaching.
Similarly, without inside knowledge of what’s going on at the training ground, we don’t know if pitches have been relaid or replaced with artificial pitches etc. Unless they have, we can probably discount the training environment.
Is it a blind spot in our data approach? is the reason we’re able to get these players that others are discounting them partly on them being potentially injury prone?
Is it just bad luck? It seems to be ongoing and happening consistently, you’d think the club would be looking closely at how this keeps happening.
If these injuries were all occurring e.g. during a particular drill, you’d hope that would be being picked up on and the drill replaced with something less destructive. Similarly if they were all occurring at the end of training sessions, you’d think that we’d switch to shorter, more intense, training sessions.
I’d just like to know that somebody at the club is investigating how/why this keeps happening, and is looking for a solution.
Jota is the only one in and out. It’s very lucky.That argument falls down when Liverpool currently only have three. Is there a more high intensity team who play more games?
Konate and Bradley (not their first choice RB but still) too? Not as bad as our record of course.Jota is the only one in and out. It’s very lucky.
I think City played every 4 days for about 5 seasons and hardly had any eitherThat argument falls down when Liverpool currently only have three. Is there a more high intensity team who play more games?