[Albion] Injuries 2024/25

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊









tstanbur

Well-known member
Sep 16, 2011
649
If, as suggested, Fabian is over working the players fitness in training I see little sign of it working on the pitch. Our players often seemed tuckered by about 60 minutes .

However, to counter my own opinion we have scored 11 goals after the eighty minutes mark in 23 games - is that good or par for the course ?
Always assumed that is the plan - starters put it in for first hour or so then we put on like-for-like subs to do the same.
 


chickens

Have you considered masterly inactivity?
NSC Patron
Oct 12, 2022
2,879
We’ve had these injuries over several seasons and under different head coaches. This suggests to me that we’re not over-coaching.

Similarly, without inside knowledge of what’s going on at the training ground, we don’t know if pitches have been relaid or replaced with artificial pitches etc. Unless they have, we can probably discount the training environment.

Is it a blind spot in our data approach? is the reason we’re able to get these players that others are discounting them partly on them being potentially injury prone?

Is it just bad luck? It seems to be ongoing and happening consistently, you’d think the club would be looking closely at how this keeps happening.

If these injuries were all occurring e.g. during a particular drill, you’d hope that would be being picked up on and the drill replaced with something less destructive. Similarly if they were all occurring at the end of training sessions, you’d think that we’d switch to shorter, more intense, training sessions.

I’d just like to know that somebody at the club is investigating how/why this keeps happening, and is looking for a solution.
 


Nobby Cybergoat

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2021
9,069
Always assumed that is the plan - starters put it in for first hour or so then we put on like-for-like subs to do the same.
That's exactly what I thought it would be at the start of the season. A fairly like for like, two front 4's, with everyone getting loads of game time. It's a really exciting idea.

But it's not really worked out like that. Subs have, mostly (but not always) been much later than I would have expected. Injuries all over the pitch have hampered presumably pre made plans and players subbed in have often failed to impact, with one or 2 notably out of form
 




Nobby Cybergoat

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2021
9,069
We’ve had these injuries over several seasons and under different head coaches. This suggests to me that we’re not over-coaching.

Similarly, without inside knowledge of what’s going on at the training ground, we don’t know if pitches have been relaid or replaced with artificial pitches etc. Unless they have, we can probably discount the training environment.

Is it a blind spot in our data approach? is the reason we’re able to get these players that others are discounting them partly on them being potentially injury prone?

Is it just bad luck? It seems to be ongoing and happening consistently, you’d think the club would be looking closely at how this keeps happening.

If these injuries were all occurring e.g. during a particular drill, you’d hope that would be being picked up on and the drill replaced with something less destructive. Similarly if they were all occurring at the end of training sessions, you’d think that we’d switch to shorter, more intense, training sessions.

I’d just like to know that somebody at the club is investigating how/why this keeps happening, and is looking for a solution.
I think the same as you. From the outside, none of the explanations on their own make any sense. I hope the club aren't just putting this down to luck. Given the scale of the issue, i'd like the think there is a full scale review in progress.
 


chaileyjem

#BarberIn
NSC Patron
Jun 27, 2012
14,797
For those speculating and searching for reasons - Why do Brentford, Wolves, Spurs and Newcastle have similar or worse injury patterns to us - at least in terms of number of current players out. (9 or 10)
 






chaileyjem

#BarberIn
NSC Patron
Jun 27, 2012
14,797
The pitches there are Cat A, state of the art.

It surely can't be that.

There are also loads of teams who play an intense pressing style and play more games than we do and barely get an injury
there aren't any teams that "barely get an injury" and many if not most get multiple injuiries and several teams this year who have had just as bad a injury list (Brentford, Wolves, Spurs etc) .
 


chaileyjem

#BarberIn
NSC Patron
Jun 27, 2012
14,797
I think the same as you. From the outside, none of the explanations on their own make any sense.
what explanations ? Dunk having a recurrence of a calf injury he had a few weeks ago ? Pedro having a twisted ankle ? Igor having to have (like Welbeck in past seasons) an op on his hamstring, Ferdi having a toe operation ? Why do they not make sense ?
 


Nobby Cybergoat

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2021
9,069
what explanations ? Dunk having a recurrence of a calf injury he had a few weeks ago ? Pedro having a twisted ankle ? Igor having to have (like Welbeck in past seasons) an op on his hamstring, Ferdi having a toe operation ? Why do they not make sense ?
The numbers. The numbers don't make sense. Sure in your approach if you look at each instance in isolation then each makes sense. But there's a number of injuries over more than a season here and that's what I think the club should be looking at. I would be amazed if they were just sitting back and concluding straight away it's just bad luck
 




Nobby Cybergoat

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2021
9,069
there aren't any teams that "barely get an injury" and many if not most get multiple injuiries and several teams this year who have had just as bad a injury list (Brentford, Wolves, Spurs etc) .
And I really don't care about f***ing Brentford. We've got to look after what we're doing, as do they.

The number and length of injuries we've been getting is way worse than most pl clubs and way worse than it's been at any time in recent or not so recent years.

It's not illegitimate to be asking these questions
 


Forster's Armband

Well-known member
Sep 23, 2008
2,568
London
Players are playing too many games. The style of most football clubs has moved to high intensity so more injuries occur. It isn't just us at all it's loads of teams. I am certain the club will be looking into it and that our new medical team is all part of that.
 


Flounce

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 15, 2006
5,062
Players are playing too many games. The style of most football clubs has moved to high intensity so more injuries occur. It isn't just us at all it's loads of teams. I am certain the club will be looking into it and that our new medical team is all part of that.
That argument falls down when Liverpool currently only have three. Is there a more high intensity team who play more games?
 




Jim in the West

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 13, 2003
4,997
Way out West
That argument falls down when Liverpool currently only have three. Is there a more high intensity team who play more games?
Indeed - I was trying to find the stats on running distances etc, but even without these it is obvious that certain teams play in a pretty intense way - and whose players have significantly more game time. I'm sure the club are dedicating a lot of time and effort to this....and there is probably a large dose of bad luck at play.

No doubt linked to this, it was interesting to hear Fab talking last week about Gomez's physicality - it's obviously an attribute that he looks for, and which his style of play demands. So, players like Rutter, JPVH, Veltman, Minteh, Baleba, etc are very important (even though their physicality doesn't necessarily stop them getting injured).
 


The Fits

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2020
10,251
Human beings don’t like randomness, especially when it involves our football clubs.
 


7dialssouthpaw

Active member
Sep 10, 2022
279
We’ve had these injuries over several seasons and under different head coaches. This suggests to me that we’re not over-coaching.

Similarly, without inside knowledge of what’s going on at the training ground, we don’t know if pitches have been relaid or replaced with artificial pitches etc. Unless they have, we can probably discount the training environment.

Is it a blind spot in our data approach? is the reason we’re able to get these players that others are discounting them partly on them being potentially injury prone?

Is it just bad luck? It seems to be ongoing and happening consistently, you’d think the club would be looking closely at how this keeps happening.

If these injuries were all occurring e.g. during a particular drill, you’d hope that would be being picked up on and the drill replaced with something less destructive. Similarly if they were all occurring at the end of training sessions, you’d think that we’d switch to shorter, more intense, training sessions.

I’d just like to know that somebody at the club is investigating how/why this keeps happening, and is looking for a solution.
good reasoning, Sir/M.
I floated my theory that our chalky soil may be an issue last week, but was persuaded otherwise by other commenters. I then looked at the stats for the WSL team, to create a kind of "control group" and saw that they are historically fairly average.
BUT - I do like your point about the blind spot - ie. is the algorithm missing the intangible of us being flogged sick-note players?
Our stats must be weighed by just a handful of players that are off a lot (incl. for eg. Moder, Lamptey, Webster, JPedro, Ferdi) and then also by our mixture of "old crocks" and "young breakables", as others have mentioned.
TLDR: I blame the algorithm!
 








Nobby Cybergoat

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2021
9,069
That argument falls down when Liverpool currently only have three. Is there a more high intensity team who play more games?
I think City played every 4 days for about 5 seasons and hardly had any either
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top