Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[News] Middle East conflict



AstroSloth

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2020
1,268
and you continually put a laughing emoji when i do, glad you find it funny even if it is half that amount which I doubt.

Done talking to you too, you seem to have the same agender.
They've been doing it in the Hamas/Gaza/Israel thread too the entire time.

Until they got banned from it for being vile. Wonder how long it will take for them to be banned on this thread too?
 




Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
6,215
Back on the topic of pager explosions;

‘UN rights chief demands accountability for Lebanon pager blasts​


Volker Turk says those responsible for the deadly wave of explosions across Lebanon targeting paging devices used by members of Hezbollah “must be held to account”.
“Simultaneous targeting of thousands of individuals, whether civilians or members of armed groups, without knowledge as to who was in possession of the targeted devices, their location and their surroundings at the time of the attack, violates international human rights law and, to the extent applicable, international humanitarian law,” the UN rights chief said in a statement.’

NEWS UPDATE Further explosions have gone off this afternoon in multiple Lebanese cities with Walkie Talkies radios being targeted in a similar way to the pagers that went off yesterday .


 


aolstudios

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2011
5,080
brighton
Israel doesn't have a problem with Lebanon , Israel has an issue with the Palestinians who moved there after the creation of the Israeli state and from whom were drafted PLO fighters to attack Israel. The majority of the original Lebanese people (Christian arabs & Druze) do not want the Palestinians there and fought against them with the help of the Israelis . Hezbollah moved in and are too powerful for the Lebanese to control so they basically use the southern part of Lebanon to attack Israel.

By settlers do you mean those Jews that settled in Israel in the late 1940s? Do you believe the state of Israel shouldn't exist ?

Hezbollah is driven by Iran and its agenda not what the Palestinians want.

Israel is not after taking land from Lebanon , it would prefer that there was a stable, neutral government there as there was for the first 30 years of its existence i.e. during the 1947, 56, 67 and 73 wars Israel did not have to worry about large attacks from the North.

In all the comments nothing is ever said about the destabilisation of Lebanon by the first the PLO and then Hezbollah which has resulted in killings.
Well, exactly ^
 


Wardy's twin

Well-known member
Oct 21, 2014
8,753
while following some rules of war accepted at the time, we did a lot of things we dont find acceptable today. maybe at least try to address the question without resorting to whataboutery.
The problem is worse now, the fighters are embedded within the civilian population not on some well established and documented front line, the war zone is everywhere. Its inevitable that civilians will die as they have throughout history when war zones (which were more limited ) moved through civilian areas.

Agreed as a society we should have moved on but we haven't, humans are still violent and nasty and if your enemy is violent and nasty then you would be a fool to think you would be able to defeat them without breaking some rules.
 


Tom Hark Preston Park

Will Post For Cash
Jul 6, 2003
71,958
These are a superb book. Guess they're going to have to bring out an updated version now

IMG_20240918_165607.jpg
 




Wardy's twin

Well-known member
Oct 21, 2014
8,753
In physics, yes.

But in the humanitarian world this is called "an eye for an eye".
If this were applied, the whole world would be blind ....

The human approach is E+R=O
When an EVENT occurs a RESPONSE can be chosen (including nil) - the RESPONSE chosen will dictate the OUTCOME
Simple in micro events but macro events like terrorism it's easier said then done.

I have no answers.
What I do observe is that it appears (to me) that 99% of global conflict is either religion or political based.
If we could just irradiate the root-cause, maybe that would fix the problem(s)?

A sad and dangerous world we live in ....

Humans are a lot more complicated than physics they have emotions which are totally unpredictable and what we know about the human race is that its aggressive and greedy always wanting more and that's why its become the dominant species on the planet and that's why it will ultimately wipe it self out if not through war it will be global warming.

Once you have the drive for stuff and that includes just plain old survival you start to identify like minded people and you form a pack. That's how we evolved and that's became dominant against other animals and then dominant against other human species ( Neanderthals ) and then other humans with wealth, religion, political opinion, race or indeed just not being in the same 'pack' was enough to identify targets.
 








Seagull58

In the Algarve
Jan 31, 2012
8,223
Vilamoura, Portugal
It was never the objective of the IRA to wipe out the protestants or the English and there in lies the major difference and that is pretty much true of the groups you mention above. In the case of the IRA it was clear that the conflict was going nowhere, support was waning (especially as economic conditions improved) and rational people (yes i did say that) decided that peace might be a better option .

Until its clear that demands for the destruction of Israel are stopped then the Netanyahu's position seems justified to the current majority of Israelis and with that comes the continued aggressiveness.
The IRA'S objective was to remove Northern Ireland from the UK and incorporate it back into the Irish State. They decided to turn away from violence and embrace a peaceful politic process, as a result of which Sin Fein participates in the governance of Northern Ireland.
It is not totally inconceivable that a peaceful political way forward would be embraced in the Middle East, such as a 2 State solution, and Hezbollah, Hamas etc. lay down their arms.
 


Seagull58

In the Algarve
Jan 31, 2012
8,223
Vilamoura, Portugal
Sorry, not following your point. I was saying that it doesn't matter whether we think that the collateral deaths associated with the pager bombs means that this act is not as bad as 9/11 or is just as bad (in a game of terror top trumps). I think it means 'not as bad' but I don't think that what I think will affect anything going forward, for the reasons explained.

And related to that, I don't think that the pager bombs has made it any more or less likely that Hamas or Hezbollah will make peace with Israel (that was not my point by the way, my point was about whether what we think about it will have any influence on whether Hamas or Hezbollah will make peace with Israel (and indeed, vice versa)).
You said "Perhaps the worst aspect of this, collateral damage aside, is that it will achieve nothing useful. The terrorists are hardly going to think "boy, those Israelis are damned smart - we had better leave them alone and seek a peace deal".
My point is that you can't be sure of that. There are many instances of terrorist/freedom fighter organisations giving up armed struggle for various reasons.
 


British Bulldog

The great escape
Feb 6, 2006
10,971
Is it wrong to tell foreign nuisance callers their device is due to explode in 5 4 3 2 1 and then shout BANG? Just asking for a friend?
 




Seagull58

In the Algarve
Jan 31, 2012
8,223
Vilamoura, Portugal
I do think it is a cop out.

You do not care either, that is your opinion and your certainly allowed to hold it, but it speaks volumes to me.

I am done holding a conversation with you, because I can be persuaded with valid points and arguments.
You clearly have an allegiance to a death machine that kills just as indiscriminately as Hezbollah and Hamas.

Good luck with your life.
That is nonsense.
 


Wardy's twin

Well-known member
Oct 21, 2014
8,753
The IRA'S objective was to remove Northern Ireland from the UK and incorporate it back into the Irish State. They decided to turn away from violence and embrace a peaceful politic process, as a result of which Sin Fein participates in the governance of Northern Ireland.
It is not totally inconceivable that a peaceful political way forward would be embraced in the Middle East, such as a 2 State solution, and Hezbollah, Hamas etc. lay down their arms.
Nothing is impossible but Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran's stated objective is much deeper and further away from compromise than what happened in NI so for that to happen other major changes would need to happen.
 


Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
54,892
Faversham
You said "Perhaps the worst aspect of this, collateral damage aside, is that it will achieve nothing useful. The terrorists are hardly going to think "boy, those Israelis are damned smart - we had better leave them alone and seek a peace deal".
My point is that you can't be sure of that. There are many instances of terrorist/freedom fighter organisations giving up armed struggle for various reasons.
OK. I personally doubt that Hezbollah or Hamas will give up and make peace with Israel whether Israel does or does not blow up their pagers. My expectation is that they will seek revenge.

But I will be delighted if proven wrong.
 




Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
54,892
Faversham
Fair enough but you have frequently argued that our opinions in the UK don’t matter when it comes to what is happening in the ME or indeed the US election so assumed it was more of the same.

Apologies if you think I have misinterpreted a point you made. 👍

I think it still matters imo that we acknowledge that a State entity, a signatory of the Geneva convention should be held to at least as high standards if not higher than we expect of a non-State terrorist organisation when it comes to disregarding civilian casualties regardless of whether they are deliberately targeting them or not.

ps we on on the same wavelength most of the time it’s ok to disagree sometimes - don’t take it personally :kiss:
No, I am happy to agree with all that :thumbsup:
 


DJ Chi

Member
Mar 10, 2023
14
The IRA'S objective was to remove Northern Ireland from the UK and incorporate it back into the Irish State. They decided to turn away from violence and embrace a peaceful politic process, as a result of which Sin Fein participates in the governance of Northern Ireland.
It is not totally inconceivable that a peaceful political way forward would be embraced in the Middle East, such as a 2 State solution, and Hezbollah, Hamas etc. lay down their arms.

There is no chance of this happening. The people of the Republic of Ireland (mostly) were not living in abject poverty whilst their neighbour helped itself for vast tracts of the resources, living mostly in luxury in homes that you could see from the other side of the fence.

Hamas/Hezbollah have the destruction of Israel written into their charters, it's their raison d'etre. On the other side, it's massively in Netanyahu's interest for this conflict to continue for as long and as violently as possible. He needs the illusion of an existential war, 1984 style, to remain in power. A wholesale change of leaders on both sides will be required before there is any prospect whatsoever of a two state solution.
 


Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
54,892
Faversham
if Hezbollah attacks a barracks or police station in Israel, is that ok then and not terrorism, because its targetted?

maybe i'm the odd one, in my eyes, deliberatly maiming targets just isn't how you go about immobilising an adversary.
No, you are absolutely right. As I mentioned previously my expectation is Bibi and his gang will be having a good old laugh about all the injuries, and will then jog on to something else.

Both 'sides' are petty and vindictive (flinging bombs from Gaza into Israel to kill a few hundred civilians is petty and vindictive as well as pointless, as is mining pagers), and both have leaderships that have no intention of pursuing peace. That's the biggest problem (and is yet another thing that resonates with my comment about it not mattering about which bit of killing and maiming by which side is the more virtuous and the least atrocious).
 
Last edited:


nickbrighton

Well-known member
Feb 19, 2016
2,083
Israel surrendered the high ground many many years ago, allowing attacks on refugee camps whilst looking on. This latest act just shows them for what they have become- a terrorist state. Had this been Russia doing the same thing in Ukraine there would be outrage. Israel seem to have taken a leaf from Putins book- bomb Gaza back to the middle ages, with scant regard for civilian casualties, and now this, which had no way of being targeted. there was no way of knowing whether man, woman, child were near the pagers when they were triggered

There is a massive difference between rightfully defending themselves and committing acts of terror, Israel crossed over that line sometime ago
 




Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
54,892
Faversham
There is no chance of this happening. The people of the Republic of Ireland (mostly) were not living in abject poverty whilst their neighbour helped itself for vast tracts of the resources, living mostly in luxury in homes that you could see from the other side of the fence.

Hamas/Hezbollah have the destruction of Israel written into their charters, it's their raison d'etre. On the other side, it's massively in Netanyahu's interest for this conflict to continue for as long and as violently as possible. He needs the illusion of an existential war, 1984 style, to remain in power. A wholesale change of leaders on both sides will be required before there is any prospect whatsoever of a two state solution.
Nailed it.

Sad though, isn't it.
 


Seagull58

In the Algarve
Jan 31, 2012
8,223
Vilamoura, Portugal
OK. I personally doubt that Hezbollah or Hamas will give up and make peace with Israel whether Israel does or does not blow up their pagers. My expectation is that they will seek revenge.

But I will be delighted if proven wrong.
In the immediate future I expect you are correct. In the long term Netanyahu will go and could be replaced with more moderate leadership, Iran's leadership could change, Syria's leadership could change, Hezbollah and Hamas could decide that the way they are attempting to achieve their objective is not sustainable and they must pursue another path. Some terrorists become political leaders and participate in government.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here