Uncle Buck said:Taylor won the second division, McGhee had to get us promoted via the play offs?
Hannibal smith said:But Magoo didn't cry off in the Championship. By leaving and citing financial difficulties, Taylor effectively admitted he couldn't keep us up, which Magoo has done. I'd rather have Coppell but certainly not Taylor.
As someone mentioned, Zamora helped as well.
Uncle Buck said:Zamora was a more all round player than Knight and far more down to earth. Yet in the third tier of English football they scored roughly the same amount of goals.
KinkyHitler said:As did Knight
Hannibal smith said:Only in League 1
Sid James said:Not sure what you mean. We aren't in the 3rd tier and the difference is vast.
You can't possibly mean that inheriting Knight and Zamora is the same thing.
Can you ?
Richie Morris said:I dont think it is JUST the forwards fault. The service they get is appalling at times and rarely do any of our midfield get ahead of the ball and occupy defenders.
Easy 10 said::lifts hand guiltily:
Icy Gull said:Coppell brought in short term fixes, two of whom were old and ended up injured and paid for a year.
Uncle Buck said:Brighton v Wolves: - Kazim-Richards and Knight
Stoke v Brighton: - Kazim-Richards and Robinson
Brighton v Crystal Palace: - Knight and Robinson
Cardiff v Brighton: - Knight and McPhee
Brighton v Derby: - Knight and McPhee
Watford v Brighton: - Kazim-Richards and Robinson
Reading v Brighton: - Knight
Brighton v Hull: - Hart and Kazim-Richards
Brighton v QPR: - Kazim-Richards and Knight
Luton v Brighton: - McCammon and Turienzo
Brighton v Millwall: - McCammon and Kazim-Richards
Southampton v Brighton: - McCammon and Robinson
Brighton v Coventry: - Kazim-Richards and Carole
Now I know there have been some changes due to suspensions etc, but in the last 13 games, there has only been one instance where the same striker pairing has played 2 games in succesion together which was Knight and McPhee for the Cardiff and Derby games.
Now surely if we looked at playing the same pairing for a run of games they might learn each others strengths and weaknesses and build up an understanding? Got to be worth a try.
London Irish said:No, complete red herring - you've seen those games and how effective all those players have been.
We need a new player, period.
London Irish said:At least there is one honest man on here. I'm willing to bet plenty of the people who've slagged off McGhee's signing of Malongo were also exercising their voices that day, and would never have forgiven McGhee if we hadn't taken a chance on him.
Uncle Buck said:Brighton v Wolves: - Kazim-Richards and Knight
Stoke v Brighton: - Kazim-Richards and Robinson
Brighton v Crystal Palace: - Knight and Robinson
Cardiff v Brighton: - Knight and McPhee
Brighton v Derby: - Knight and McPhee
Watford v Brighton: - Kazim-Richards and Robinson
Reading v Brighton: - Knight
Brighton v Hull: - Hart and Kazim-Richards
Brighton v QPR: - Kazim-Richards and Knight
Luton v Brighton: - McCammon and Turienzo
Brighton v Millwall: - McCammon and Kazim-Richards
Southampton v Brighton: - McCammon and Robinson
Brighton v Coventry: - Kazim-Richards and Carole
Now I know there have been some changes due to suspensions etc, but in the last 13 games, there has only been one instance where the same striker pairing has played 2 games in succesion together which was Knight and McPhee for the Cardiff and Derby games.
Now surely if we looked at playing the same pairing for a run of games they might learn each others strengths and weaknesses and build up an understanding? Got to be worth a try.
You weren't the only one. Most people on that terrace thought exactly the same including me.Easy 10 said:
I thought the fella looked MUSTARD at Crawley. Shows what I know.