FPC Snipers Are Off Again?!

[Brighton Breezy]

I think a number of people on here like to THINK they are involved in the process...

 

[Uncle Buck]

Not so.

Although the poster I have in mind hasn't contributed to this thread.

Were they employed in the process?

However the other poster said that people on this thread were involved, which they were not.

 

[Uncle Buck]

I think a number of people on here like to THINK they are involved in the process...

Now, now.

 

[steward 433]

Not so.

Although the poster I have in mind hasn't contributed to this thread.

I know of two one has posted and the other hasn't

 

[Lord Bracknell]

Were they employed in the process?

Yes.

And they still are.

They may not have contributed to the thread, but they've read it.

 

[Uncle Buck]

Yes.

And they still are.

However none on this thread.

 

[Uncle Buck]

Were the Falmer for All team (or team members) employed as part of the Falmer Project team or was Falmer for All just another pressure group?

 

[Brighton Breezy]

Maybe if they spent less time reading threads on here and more on sorting the ground out...

 

[Uncle Buck]

Maybe if they spent less time reading threads on here and more on sorting the ground out...

Look, 11 years and counting is fine.

 

[Brighton Breezy]

Eleven very LONG years...

 

[Scoffers]

Blimey is this thread still alive !

Some folks just dont have any work to do

 

[Lord Bracknell]

Were the Falmer for All team (or team members) employed as part of the Falmer Project team or was Falmer for All just another pressure group?

Whilst some of the FFA team put in hours of voluntary work to support the project (not just campaigning, incidentally, but some 'real' work that supported the Club through the public inquiry phase), none of the team were employed or paid to do so.

 

[steward 433]

Blimey is this thread still alive !

Some folks just dont have any work to do

I am multi tasking thank you

 

[Uncle Buck]

Whilst some of the FFA team put in hours of voluntary work to support the project (not just campaigning, incidentally, but some 'real' work that supported the Club through the public inquiry phase), none of the team were employed or paid to do so.

So they were not part of the clubs project team.

 

[Brighton Breezy]

Whether or not people were on the project team, which it would now appear they were not, it does not suddenly mean that should make the Falmer saga above scrutiny.

 

[Mendoza]

St Pancras











shit wrong thread

 

[Uncle Buck]

Whether or not people were on the project team, which it would now appear they were not, it does not suddenly mean that should make the Falmer saga above scrutiny.

Of course it does.

Until the work starts, the old line of not giving the opponents any ammunition will be used.

 

[The Large One]

Whether or not people were on the project team, which it would now appear they were not, it does not suddenly mean that should make the Falmer saga above scrutiny.

Who mentioned in the first place that the Falmer saga should not be scrutinised?

 

[steward 433]

Why are people still so negative about this whole project? I just don't get it

 

[Brighton Breezy]

Anyone who does show the slightests concernt for the delays will be shot down in flames as a bad fan who does not understand the problems the club is facing.

In reality those who are concerned are no less of a fan just perhaps not blindly putting their faith in those behind a project already 11 years old...