Rusthall Seagull
New member
Telling millions of Africans (amongst others) that they should not wear condoms or they will burn in hell.
surely, that means he is responsible for a lot of life too ?
Telling millions of Africans (amongst others) that they should not wear condoms or they will burn in hell.
I will watch it. And I'm sure I will find them backwards, horrible people. I'm fed up with the media showing just the insane 2% of "Christians" who take every single word of the (translated a fair few times) Bible EXACTLY literally.
You seen the Westboro Baptist Church people? Disgusting attitudes towards modern life.
True Christianity should just be about trying to emulate Jesus' life and teachings.
So when people say Christian Values, what they actually mean, is Buddhist values?True Christianity really should. Christian meaning Christ like.
ie. Christianity SHOULD mean trying your best to be like Jesus, basically. And yes, he completely promoted all those things.
My point is about his attitude really. He has every right to write what he wants.
He doesn't study Christians from an open, balanced viewpoint though does he?
If I studied Lesbians but only from a clearly disparaging viewpoint and then presented my skewed findings as fact I would expect them to be unhappy with that, wouldn't you?
surely, that means he is responsible for a lot of life too ?
Has anyone read The NSC Delusion?
It's all about the belief that you can somehow convince someone with a diametrically opposing view to your own to change their mind on an internet message board.
Well I take issue with one thing there. The media always doing that. They don't. This extreme christianity appears to be a recent thing in this country.
Oh dear.
No, what he says is that there is no place in a secular society for religious people to be involved in the mechanism of state, why should Bishops and other theologians be allowed to sit on policy groups, governmental steering committees and other influential gatherings where their religious input directly affects the rest of us? what authority do they do this? He argues that Humanity has outgrown the need for a divine comfort blanket and we should resist faith groups interfering with our development as a society at every turn.
If you argue that Dawkins,has no right to comment on religion because he is not a christian then do you similarly resist Christians having a poweful voice in matters of science and medicine? stem cell research? IVF? euthenasia?, after all they're not scientists so why should we listen to them...but we have to, mores the pity.
It's a common phenomena amongst religious people that they will use the authority of "God" to back whatever small minded idiotic opinion they have and then attempt to shout down detractors with threats of damnation.
Its lazy, moronic and childish and the sooner we're done with it,the better.
oh dear what ? you think that is crass ?
binfesting about GOD on a Friday
I get no satisfaction from that.
NUN at all.
Have you read 'The Delusion of the NSC Delusion'? Which is all about binfesting about GOD on a Friday when you have a hangover so as to avoid work and keep you occupied till the weekend starts.
That looks uncannily like the lesbian office admniistrator I work with, she alway wears black too.
No. He thinks you are stupid.
God is dead. Long live Dog.
Exactly, whilst all the deniers were creaming themselves over some random program about 0.0000000000001 % of christians being 'extreme' - I was out with my god bothering mates getting smashed