For Albert Einstein, it wasn't a choice of choosing Science over Religion or vice versa - one is significantly weaker without the other.
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
Quite.
For Albert Einstein, it wasn't a choice of choosing Science over Religion or vice versa - one is significantly weaker without the other.
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
So is Ken Dodd's dad's dog.
He worked out alright.
When I used to say I wasn`t going to eat my dinner I got a clip round the earhole from my mum when he said it they gave him India.
A race of JEWISH people, mainly.
I can well understand that there are people who feel the need to complete their lives and cope with situations by placing blame in some existential being, I just don't feel the need in my life. When I argued this with the bigoted Jehovah's that come over my house and blame my disability on something that I have done, they stated that I must have some religious experience when I see people die at work, and I don't, because I don't need to. I know when people die, their organs shut down, and their heart stops. That's it in my mind.
It can be argued that people live in the worst conditions possible because they don't have access to the science that will get them out of their problems - especially from a medical point of view.
You realise the majority of Christians AREN'T Creationists yeah?
I believe in Jesus. Believing in Jesus doesn't mean taking everything (translated) literally. Some of it is very clearly parables, metaphors, allegories and the like.
Religion explains why, Science explains how.
I haven't seen many balanced views of Christianity in the media recently, putting them in a positive light, showing them putting Jesus' teachings of love, compassion, non-prejudice and community into practice. I see these things all the time in the local church.
No one say Songs of Praise.
You may say you won't but that would be an untruth
For Albert Einstein, it wasn't a choice of choosing Science over Religion or vice versa - one is significantly weaker without the other.
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
But science can only be created by those who are thoroughly imbued with the aspiration toward truth and understanding. This source of feeling, however, springs from the sphere of religion.
The further the spiritual evolution of mankind advances, the more certain it seems to me that the path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of life, and the fear of death, and blind faith, but through striving after rational knowledge. In this sense I believe that the priest must become a teacher if he wishes to do justice to his lofty educational mission.
...
But if you look back over the religious history how many people/animals were sacrificed in the name of this field?
couldnt let that go past. dont try the moral card.
Christians shouldn't be fighting really.
There's plenty of slander directed at religions for past acts by its opponents.
widely misquoted out of context. Einstien was a declared agnostic. The "religion" he speaks of is not that of established churches, but rather the deeper inate feeling we have to question the world and seek answers:
ultimatly he holds science above religion:
from the same letter as the misquote