Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Carole.
- Thread starter Starry
- Start date
Da Man Clay
T'Blades
- Dec 16, 2004
- 16,280
B.W. said:
I agree, it is very very unlikely he will go for nothing. Just cos we got him for nothing dont mean we will sell him for it!
Silent Bob
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- Dec 6, 2004
- 22,172
We didn't get him for nothing.DAMANCLAY said:
Publius Ovidius
Well-known member
I think maybe we are over-estimating his worth!
We do not know what his contract says with regards to a release clause and we can only speculate, but I would go back to our financial position and suggest that we could not be picky in our contract requirements for Carole and Frutos.
If we are also looking to releive the wage bill, and the fact that carole was out of favour with MM at the end of the season when we wanted our best players in the team, then perhaps offloading carole is part of MM's plans
We do not know what his contract says with regards to a release clause and we can only speculate, but I would go back to our financial position and suggest that we could not be picky in our contract requirements for Carole and Frutos.
If we are also looking to releive the wage bill, and the fact that carole was out of favour with MM at the end of the season when we wanted our best players in the team, then perhaps offloading carole is part of MM's plans
Da Man Clay
T'Blades
- Dec 16, 2004
- 16,280
Dies Irae said:
I would very much doubt we would offload him for nothing. Especially if Leeds were interested. And as someone said earlier we didn't get him for nothing (I had forgotten us paying the agent) it seems even less likely.
dcseagull
New member
Does anyone seriously think Frutos will be with us next season?
Publius Ovidius
Well-known member
no
my sources said they would both be gone due to thier get out clause
looks like leeds are the first dip at that
my sources said they would both be gone due to thier get out clause
looks like leeds are the first dip at that
blockhseagull
Well-known member
dcseagull said:
Yes
1
1066gull
Guest
Yesdcseagull said:
Da Man Clay
T'Blades
- Dec 16, 2004
- 16,280
dcseagull said:
No
BHA Jordan
New member
- Dec 14, 2005
- 604
I think he will, but all this talk of release clauses makes you wonder
Deportivo Seagull
I should coco
B.W. said:
There is one very big difference between us and the rest of the clubs in the league ... we do not have any major assets in which to balance against the type of risk that you are proposing. In asset terms we are arguably the poorest team in the league ....
Personally I thought we needed a midfielder and striker to keep us up and that would have cost approx £6K a week not including transfer fee signing on fee etc.
blockhseagull
Well-known member
Just because Frutos might have a release clause doesn't mean someone will think he is worth it
Leeds only want Carole because he had such a good game against them..... didn't do enough for me over the course of the season
Leeds only want Carole because he had such a good game against them..... didn't do enough for me over the course of the season
BHA Jordan
New member
- Dec 14, 2005
- 604
Spot on, in fact in terms of any asset we are probably the poorest of the poor, or at least within the top 5 poorest clubsDeportivo Seagull said:
The Large One
Who's Next?
I don't recall Carole being 'out of favour'. Off-form, maybe, but 'out of favour' makes it sound like another one of these *ahem* falling outs.
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,071
BHA Jordan said:
Sorry, but it has started already....
BHA Jordan
New member
- Dec 14, 2005
- 604
Started already?Uncle Buck said:
- Thread starter
- #140
B.W. said:
Which paper? Because there is no mention of a fee in the YEP which, so far, is the only place carrying the story.
The full thing says "Albion will almost certainly hold out for a fee" and goes on to say about him being out of contract next summer etc.
Last edited: