Search results

Depending on the result.....

Including ourselves for singing 1-0 to the batty boys etc etc?

1st one looks like Frank Skinner

Sid had no reason to lie about being banned......

Following on from Sid's infamous thread, I am rather sceptical on threads like this!

I think it was right that the Libyans chose his fate and not the US or UK. A trial would have been an expensive farce and so reluctantly it is probably better he is killed immediately and they can start to move on today

Don't go comparing him to Arismendi, he was flair in a whole world of his own

Hopefully we'll sign the Hungarian then that will be two more countries covered in our international army of flair

I love that after weeks of speculation we suddenly sign someone who hasn't been mentioned at all (that I have seen anyway)

The third one looks a bit like Peter Ward. Would never have guessed that as Tanno

Puyol, Valderamma, ermm

Chill out! Most people on here are saying how well you're doing, no need to be so touchy

Agree that they are hardly "everyone's cup final" again this season, but the rest of what he says is spot on. Congrats to him and Southampton

It's an interesting one, we voted to keep 7 subs as it suited us and we didn't worry about the affect on the rest of the football league. Why chance stance for this?

The crossbar won I think

Going to end in disaster. You can't sustain a successful team with such a high turnover of players who will be on a continual conveyor belt in and out. Would be rather miffed if I was a Donny fan. But maybe I need to see it more from their point of view that they are struggling and need to do...

Thanks Rookie. Hopefully parents will realise then that the big clubs are going to be massively increasing their youth intake if they can pick anyone up on the cheap, and therefore think perhaps it's better to stay with the original club and they'll have next to no chance of making it at said...

I really must be misunderstanding this as I don't see it as that big an issue. We're a long way from producing players aged 16 or below that are going to be of interest enough to the big clubs as are most clubs, therefore it isn't really going to affect 99.9% of young players in the country as...

Doesn't this only apply to kids up to the age of 16? So all the above players would have been bought for whatever fee the selling club agreed to and not limited to the new figures?