Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Help] #WeAreAllZelenskyyNow



Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
Nah you’re alright, taking on Russia without the yanks isn’t an option, let the Diplomats sort this one out.
I don’t fancy a nuclear war.
It won’t come to that. Putin is struggling having to call in the North Koreans to help, and their economy is tanking.
 




Westdene Seagull

aka Cap'n Carl Firecrotch
NSC Patron
Oct 27, 2003
21,734
The arse end of Hangleton
I was just coaxing your narrative out, and there it is. The choice isn’t linear, but there is a chance to broker peace rather than making more conscripts and civilians die for your hashtags - and while we’re on this even the title of this thread is quite frankly part of someone’s showboating ego trip, it’s all for show, the op and their disciples have no intention of doing anything other than sitting at their keyboards telling others they should die for the cause until this conflict ends.
But the choice is linear - it's a choice of allowing the aggressor to take land and then appease them with a deal allowing them to keep said invaded land or to fight to keep your land. Now if you want to appease then fine ( and I suspect given you didn't answer my capitulation question you do ) but most people would want to get rid of the aggressor. Sadly Trump and Vance are appeasers - hopefully Russia invades Alaska next.
 


cheshunt seagull

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
2,642
Why don’t we just skip all this posturing and move straight to global thermonuclear war?
Providing a credible opposition to Putin is now the only way that we can get him to roll back on the territorial ambitions that he has done little to hide and thereby reduce the risk of further conflict. Europe has to do this by itself now that the USA can no longer be relied on. You could argue that our acquiescence in 2014 led directly to where we are now and each time we let him get what he wants the stakes get higher with his next move. I hate the thought of any armed conflict with Russia; I lived in Moscow when I was younger and I believe that strength on our part at this time will also save Russian lives.


 


heathgate

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Apr 13, 2015
3,967
I don’t think you appreciate the seriousness of the situation. We’ve never been closer to a world war since 1945.
Are you crazy?.... Suez, Korea, Vietnam, various Gulf Wars, Afghanistan.. . . not to mention the Cuba crisis and the associated Cold War shenanigans that could have exploded at any given moment for 25 years.... .
 


jcdenton08

Joel Veltman Fan Club
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
16,179
Are you crazy?.... Suez, Korea, Vietnam, various Gulf Wars, Afghanistan.. . . not to mention the Cuba crisis and the associated Cold War shenanigans that could have exploded at any given moment for 25 years.... .

Are you crazy?.... Suez, Korea, Vietnam, various Gulf Wars, Afghanistan.. . . not to mention the Cuba crisis and the associated Cold War shenanigans that could have exploded at any given moment for 25 years.... .
As always, the devil is in the detail. With NATO’s strength across Europe, and a clear European/Russo-American divide, the chances of a world war have never been higher.
 




Poskettspurpose

Well-known member
Jun 18, 2021
126
Are you crazy?.... Suez, Korea, Vietnam, various Gulf Wars, Afghanistan.. . . not to mention the Cuba crisis and the associated Cold War shenanigans that could have exploded at any given moment for 25 years.... .

Are you crazy?.... Suez, Korea, Vietnam, various Gulf Wars, Afghanistan.. . . not to mention the Cuba crisis and the associated Cold War shenanigans that could have exploded at any given moment for 25 years.... .
This! Being polite there is such a sway on NSC over the last 24hrs for #passionoverfacts #imanexpertbecauseisayiam. Put simply a considerable number of posters telling you/us that you we know what we're talking about, all the while spewing absolute rubbish about what they don't know about what constitutes 'pivotal moments in history'.
 


Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
58,506
Faversham
If you remember your Orwell, a stable global scenario can be manufactured by three superstates engaging in carefully regulated 'wars' in 'disputed' territories. Largely proxy wars involving troops flown in from poorer and more primitive parts of the 'empires'.

At stake, the promise of a Great Victory (an, I am making this up now, mineral rights).

Oh and at the drop of a hat, Oceana is no longer at war with Eurasia. It is at war with Eastasia.

Rinse and repeat.

So my take is this.
There will be no US troops in combat un Ukrain.
(The fact there are Russian troops there is a sign of Putin's weakness and recklessness, risking domestic protests, albeit he crushed that easily).
Putin will not escalate to nuclear
Putin will never invade Alaska
Putin will settle for perpetual churn in Eastern Ukraine until Ukrain capitulates.
Britain and the EU will not be able to reach an agreement on how to assist Ukraine.
Britain and the UK may follow Biden's policy of sending weapons and money to perpetuate the meat-grinder
And in the end a deal will be signed and Ukraine will have lost much land and countless people.

As for the global ramifications, there are none.
Putin may start another war somewhere else in its former empire where there is a large Russian population.
But not on distant sovereign soil.
His views on the middle east seem confused.
There is nobody there who can be trusted to run a satellite soviet state.
Look at Najibullah in Afghanistan.

No, it is all a long way away and likely to stay so.
 


Poskettspurpose

Well-known member
Jun 18, 2021
126
As always, the devil is in the detail. With NATO’s strength across Europe, and a clear European/Russo-American divide, the chances of a world war have never been higher.
Is this not partially NATO's fault - Russia gave clear warnings not to encroach on it's borders? Is this a self fulfilling prophecy? The only beneficiaries for such a conflict would be the arms industry at the cost of tax payers across the world.
 




Poskettspurpose

Well-known member
Jun 18, 2021
126
For someone who was complaining about political threads on the Trump thread, joining in on this one is a bit hypocritical, is it not?

But the choice is linear - it's a choice of allowing the aggressor to take land and then appease them with a deal allowing them to keep said invaded land or to fight to keep your land. Now if you want to appease then fine ( and I suspect given you didn't answer my capitulation question you do ) but most people would want to get rid of the aggressor. Sadly Trump and Vance are appeasers - hopefully Russia invades Alaska next.
Your choice is linear - i'm sorry I meant #yourchoiceislinear
 


Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
15,714
Cumbria
Is this not partially NATO's fault - Russia gave clear warnings not to encroach on it's borders? Is this a self fulfilling prophecy? The only beneficiaries for such a conflict would be the arms industry at the cost of tax payers across the world.
When did NAT 'encroach' on Russia's borders? The biggest 'expansion' contiguous with Russia's border has come since he started his war, not before.
 


jcdenton08

Joel Veltman Fan Club
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
16,179
Is this not partially NATO's fault - Russia gave clear warnings not to encroach on it's borders? Is this a self fulfilling prophecy? The only beneficiaries for such a conflict would be the arms industry at the cost of tax payers across the world.
The only people I’ve seen put forward this ideology/justification for Russian aggression are Russian sympathisers.
 




Poskettspurpose

Well-known member
Jun 18, 2021
126




GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
50,468
Gloucester
Are you crazy?.... Suez, Korea, Vietnam, various Gulf Wars, Afghanistan.. . . not to mention the Cuba crisis and the associated Cold War shenanigans that could have exploded at any given moment for 25 years.... .
Yes, but we didn't have the psychopathic megalomaniac Hitler twins (Trump and Putin) in charge then.
 




The Grockle

Formally Croydon Seagull
Sep 26, 2008
5,806
Dorset
This country today gives nothing back to its younger people apart from financial hardship and housing misery.
Why would they fight for it?

If Putin were to invade the Baltics we'd be fighting for our very existence. I dont think it will happen but I think Putin will be boosted by Trumps shit show yesterday, I don't see an easy end to this war.
 










Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
15,714
Cumbria
Yeah but you didn't research opinion or fact (ie anything beyond your narrative)?
? So, you cited that article as containing facts to show your superior research, whilst knowing that it was just an opinion piece, and not facts at all.

It is a simple and acknowledged fact that the greatest expansion of NATO along Russia's borders has only happened since he began his war.
 


Chicken Run

Member Since Jul 2003
NSC Patron
Jul 17, 2003
20,359
Valley of Hangleton
but are they working?
Let’s hope we never have to find out, having spent a few days on a Polaris Boat and an insightful week onboard a Trident boat, not on patrol i might add ( Both times confirming i’d made the right choice to join General Service/Surface Fleet) i’m more than satisfied that they put to sea ready and capable to fire in anger 👍
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here