There you go, a little bit of education goes a long way, your use of bracketed context and clarification is a little tedious though.
Patronising irony.... My favourite!
There you go, a little bit of education goes a long way, your use of bracketed context and clarification is a little tedious though.
Its ironic use of reciprocal casual derision....
It still is!!!
This. The Country had been brought to its knees by the unions (under both Labour and the Tories) and she took them on, destroyed them and gave Britian the platform to rebuild. She didnt destroy manufacturing, the mining industry, jobs etc - the unions had already done that. But she was hardly a loveable figure; though given the mess we were in and given her opponents were people like Scargill, it was probably just as well!
Only because Labour yet again done what they know best = run the country into the ground. God help us if they win power ever again.
You mean like they ruined it in the 1940's, by setting up the NHS?
Sad.............................
How, exactly, did the unions destroy manufacturing?
For me, her most despicable act (and there are so many to choose from) was the sale of council housing. It wasn't just persuading people who couldn't afford it that they should be part of the property owning democracy, in effect the beginnings of the sub-prime market. Even more pernicious was her refusal to allow local authorities to spend the capital receipts on replacing those that were sold.
The master plan was to semi-privatise social housing by encouraging housing associations to take over the mantle, a role they were not geared up for. HA's were initially established to plug the gaps in council housing created by various housing and homelessness legislation, predominately housing the single person, they were never intended to be the main social housing provider.
In the early 1980's HA's were given a grant of 85% of the cost of construction. In order to receive this grant they had to agree to a general reduction in room size. Private developers soon cottoned on to this which is why we see the proliferation of estates of owner-occupied shoeboxes.
Thatcher realised HA's could not cope, but rather than admitting defeat she turned to the private-rented sector and as part of the Housing Act 1988 abolished fair rents and introduced market rents which is why we are now lumbered with a massive housing benefit bill.
In a word ' demarcation '
If you do not fully understand the facts, that is a very sensible thing to do.
I get the impression that you are young, and if you did not actually live through the power cuts and utter chasos the unions had made in this country, you will never understand.
I was working in Eastbourne at the time, and was on a three day week, with my pay reduced accordingly. The streets were dark as the streetlights were all out of sync, and it was like a third world country.
Some idiots will not take the time to find out about things like that, and only listen to some left-wing bleeding hearts moan about how she smashed the unions, forgetting how it freed this country to move forward. How anyone other than the ex miners in South Yorkshire, and a few other extremist areas can moan about her is beyond me. Even the Poll Tax was a great idea because we all paid the same, rather than people who worked hard to buy nice houses, and paid tax accordingly, being forced to pay over the odds for the same local services. In fact less, because they were not the ones to use the buses etc. Unfortunately, the great unwashed did not like it because they were asked to pay their way in society.
You are right, i am young but that doesnt mean i dont know my history.
All the bads and good have been mentioned on this topic and there certainly is cases for both. Obviously those who have directly been affected by Thatchers actions will say that she wasnt good for Britain, but she did do a few good things which were important for the country.
So yes, the fence for me.
Blimey, we have certainly had to delve a long way back to get an example. I thought the Lib Dims when in power, years earlier had some sound policies......
This is the first time the LibDems have had any power. The original Liberals were pushed out of the race by Labour. The Social Democrats were the moderate arm of Labour who walked out after a series of outrageous policies by a near Marxist Labour Party and set up on their own. Eventually they merged to create tha new party we see now. That is why, in reality, the LibDems are actually more socialist in many of their policies than Labour, who have chased the votes in the middle ground since Blair.
She kept me out of work for 2 years but I 'm sure it was for the good of the country though. She invented the cash in hand society in my trade.
succinctly put
Er, had a little think and no, virtually all my friends and family are on less than that, I'm self employed and I was earning nearly £22 k a few years ago but I'll be lucky to make more than £14K this year.
So, demarcation disputes were wholly responsible for the decimation of British industry. Well, it's a theory.
Whilst this is a lovely story, on a human level do you honestly believe it's point to be true?
Do you honestly believe that tens, or hundreds, of thousands of highly paid workers are just going to up-sticks and move to a far flung tax haven away from their friends and family, away from the places that they grew up, away from the cultural wealth of the Great Britain, away from where their children go to school, away from where they are settled, comfortable and know they are safe and well protected, away from where they no doubt hold a fair amount of investments - all for the sake of a few thousands of pounds in tax? I don't.
You mean like they ruined it in the 1940's, by setting up the NHS?
Sad.............................
That was a Liberal Party initiative from Beveridge, but it took until after the war for it to come about. And Labour reaped the glory.