I'm quite surprised that you claim you were in the country for 10 years, bored with nothing to do, and did not even learn the language fluently. No doubt you do NOT have ANY issue with immigrants in the UK not knowing English language either?
I wonder if it would be possible to debate this (& many other subjects) without anyone mentioning the Daily Mail in a patronising way? I understand that people have different views to me but don't feel the need to smugly suggest they purely form their opinions based upon reading a newspaper I don't like
A lot of these patronising comments are now just a cliche among people who try to sound clever by making the Daily Mail and its readers sound stupid. Few of them have ever read the Mail, so actually know nothing about it. In denigrating the Mail in this way, they actually admit to their own ignorance and prejudice. They like to sound superior, as if they only read the Telegraph, when they are probably Sun readers, or subscribers to the Morning Star, or, at best, Guardian readers, who are about as realistic as the Green Party.
A lot of these patronising comments are now just a cliche among people who try to sound clever by making the Daily Mail and its readers sound stupid. Few of them have ever read the Mail, so actually know nothing about it. In denigrating the Mail in this way, they actually admit to their own ignorance and prejudice. They like to sound superior, as if they only read the Telegraph, when they are probably Sun readers, or subscribers to the Morning Star, or, at best, Guardian readers, who are about as realistic as the Green Party.
Why is it patronising? Why do you assume that those who criticise the Mail and its readers haven't read it? I've read it many times (e.g. due to being in places like some hotels or waiting rooms where it's the only choice) and, despite knowing its reputation, I've always been deeply shocked by what appears to me as its insular, populist, zenophobic, smug, and narrow-minded tone.
The website is even worse
Home | Mail Online
Most of the establishments we used, the staff were delighted to practice their English, except in hairdressers, where little English was spoken.
I suspect thats because anyone with a moderate amount of education and or intelligence realizes we are all just human beings trying to get along. The anti EU brigade constantly spout the same xenophobic drivel that seems to come straight out of the editorial of the daily hateIt is patronising the way some posters on here smugly say "you sound like a Daily Mail reader" or something similar just because you express a view they don't agree with. Anyone who opposes mass immigration or the EU is immediately dismissed as a "Daily Mail" reader in a way that suggests that they have no intelligence & blindly follows what they read in a newspaper.
A lot of these patronising comments are now just a cliche among people who try to sound clever by making the Daily Mail and its readers sound stupid. Few of them have ever read the Mail, so actually know nothing about it. In denigrating the Mail in this way, they actually admit to their own ignorance and prejudice. They like to sound superior, as if they only read the Telegraph, when they are probably Sun readers, or subscribers to the Morning Star, or, at best, Guardian readers, who are about as realistic as the Green Party.
Can someone remind me which was the only British newspaper to support the Nazis during the 1930s?
Can someone remind me which was the only British newspaper to support the Nazis during the 1930s?
What about the whole German nation? Or is it just the Daily Mail your after?
Sorry, didn't realise the German nation was a British newspaper
5 minutes pass ? What do they get up to ? the crossword or something ? You're bald as a f***ing coot !!Funny that. The only place where I can get by without any English is my hairdressers. I speak 100% German to them: hallo, halb,.........(5 minutes pass)................, auf weidersehen.
Sorry , didnt realise people or newspapers could change in the course of 70 plus f***ing years !!Sorry, didn't realise the German nation was a British newspaper
No one is claiming that , yours is just the standard post of someone without the wit or wherewithal to give a plausible explanation as to why exactly its a good thing that we've had thousands if not millions of european immigrants here undercutting the wages of native workers ?? Contrary to the popular opinion , the majority of the influx of eastern europeans have beeen unskilled , directly affecting the very people the traitor new labour c*nts claim to represent.I suspect thats because anyone with a moderate amount of education and or intelligence realizes we are all just human beings trying to get along. The anti EU brigade constantly spout the same xenophobic drivel that seems to come straight out of the editorial of the daily hate
You know theres flood of eastern european transgender 1 legged skunk smoking thieves coming over to steal our jobs whilst claiming every benifit going and doing shoddy work on the grounds they are inferior to us Brits
Sorry , didnt realise people or newspapers could change in the course of 70 plus f***ing years !!