Not at all, after all, it's not my posts which are garbled.You having a bit of bad Monday ……seemingly making an issue about one word and making jibes about DSR drinking…perhaps go have a lay down
Not at all, after all, it's not my posts which are garbled.You having a bit of bad Monday ……seemingly making an issue about one word and making jibes about DSR drinking…perhaps go have a lay down
Jeeez. They're all out this morningWorst government ever but the simpletons will keep sticking up for them
Oh I know ..bit of a begger isn’t itJeeez. They're all out this morning
Very well, I apologise for making a post that does not fit in with what you consider right and proper.You were responding to my post. I'll ask again, have you been drinking?
It buggers belief, doesn't it?Oh I know ..bit of a begger isn’t it
Don't say that, we'll get photos of a rich German ale made from cocoa beans and sauerkraut.As for the drinking, don't judge lest you may be judged.
If you’re suffering mid to longer term memory loss, probably best to get yourself checked out.Worst government ever but the simpletons will keep sticking up for them
*nods*Liz Truss led the Worst government ever, just pipping Boris and Sunk, but the simpletons will keep sticking up for them
Could be worse ….he could post a selfieDon't say that, we'll get photos of a rich German ale made from cocoa beans and sauerkraut.
An appropriate reply from the worst ever moderator.....*nods*
Oh well playedIt buggers belief, doesn't it?
And yet there's quite the competition, apparently.An appropriate reply from the worst ever moderator.....
First time I,ve bothered to read this thread..............and the end conclusions are, that it,s told me f*** all.
It seems that the forum at Withdean, was far less eventful....( and informative) than the usual slagging off, of various posters on here.
Congratulations to all you people, who have once again, completely abused bhadeb, just because she has different opinion to you. As for all the FACTS spouted on here......(from both sides of the DW argument), as far as I am aware, the only FACTS, are that Dean Wilkins was sacked after achieving 7th place last season. To the best of my knowlegde, there have been NO statements by Dean Wilkins or Dick Knight as to why. We have bhadebs thoughts and statements..........and of course those two well known poodles of Dick Knight.....( Lord Bracknell and TLO), giving their thoughts and statements..............( I mention "poodles" as Lord Bracknell and TLO claim their information has come DIRECT from Dick Knight........that well known advertising business-man.............make of that what you will...!).
I have to say, I am a little fed-up with board and it,s double standards re; banning for abuse for some posters............and yet others.......(particularly that well-known entrepreneurial business failure TLO), can be high and mighty, and abuse at will.
So far, I have noticed four mderators at least make insulting and ridiculing comments on this thread.........Lord Bracknell, Hitony, Roz.......and Bozza. How clever you all are, in your clique. You just need that other internet bully, Hiney, and the court jester, El Presidente, and you,ll have the full set.
This messageboard is overwhelmingly in favour of Dick Knight. I too think he has done very well...........overall. However, surely this does not mean that his decisions should not be brought into question. And should his decisions be brought into question, is it right that the person/persons should be howled down with abuse...?
As regards Bozza,s pathetic answer as to disclosing a persons ID.......(or double ID...LOL..! ), this is surely a breach of ethics on here...? He seems to have time to put people down, when he feels like it...........but cannot be bothered to reply to an e-mail he requested from me....!
In conclusion, I no longer wish to beat about the bush with fancy, arrogant and pointless words......(aka TLO), so I will make my point clearly;........
I think Bozza,s posting was a ****ish thing to do.
I think Lord Bracknell is quite brilliant with planning issues etc etc, but has posted several things recently that I think are ****ish.
TLO is simply an arrogant c.unt.
That is all.
I really can't help the fact that you are a sad person who is poorly suited to be a moderator. Were it not for your left leanings on this forum you would have been hounded from here a long time ago...but please...carry on with your sick attitude.And yet there's quite the competition, apparently.
It feels like that if you were born in the 60s too. But you are right, people in this age group do have it worse than my generation. And when you feel you have things under control something comes along to upset that. It is your generation that needs some breaks if we are not to have a far more divided society. Maybe use a lifetime ISA to grab £1K back before that gets stopped (if you aren't already). No point in building new homes if people your age can't buy them, good luckThe FTB stamp duty threshold looking like it will go back to £300,000 rather than £425,000.
Kick in the teeth. Will cost me over £6k and put plans I’ve been working on for years back 6-12 months.
Feels like if you were born in the 90s every singe political decision is designed to make adult life harder
Cheers.It feels like that if you were born in the 60s too. But you are right, people in this age group do have it worse than my generation. And when you feel you have things under control something comes along to upset that. It is your generation that needs some breaks if we are not to have a far more divided society. Maybe use a lifetime ISA to grab £1K back before that gets stopped (if you aren't already). No point in building new homes if people your age can't buy them, good luck
Feel for you.The FTB stamp duty threshold looking like it will go back to £300,000 rather than £425,000.
Kick in the teeth. Will cost me over £6k and put plans I’ve been working on for years back 6-12 months.
Feels like if you were born in the 90s every singe political decision is designed to make adult life harder
Before the election Starmer clearly defined working people as those who couldn't just write a cheque to cover problems. I would suggest that under that definition people earning over £100,000 a year (about 4% of the workforce) would not be in that definition.An extract from a newspaper today ….you might have to move quickly with those plans for Tuscany
A minister has left the door open to a Budget tax raid on high earners.
Labour promised in its manifesto that it would not increase taxes on “working people”.
But Stephen Kinnock, the care minister, would not say this morning if that label would cover people who earn six figures as he failed to answer the question six times.
It comes after Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, warned high earners yesterday not to expect help at the Budget as he suggested it would be focused on “people who are on lower or middle income”.