Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

The Albion posts losses of £14.7m



Goldstone1976

We Got Calde in!!
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Apr 30, 2013
14,124
Herts
Have the accounts been filed at Companies House yet? Still a bit confused about the size of the loss TBH.

They were filed on the day of the press release. Companies House haven't managed to upload them yet though.......
 




Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
57,289
Back in Sussex
The club overspent last season deliberately. They brought foward expenses like the electronic advertising boards to avoid it going on this seasons accounts. I would hazard a guess that there was a long list of expenses being brought forward and we have only spent £500k purchasing Stephens this season whereas last year we bought Ulloa for £2m.

...and Dobbie. And Crofts.
 


B.W.

New member
Jul 5, 2003
13,666
The club overspent last season deliberately. They brought foward expenses like the electronic advertising boards to avoid it going on this seasons accounts. I would hazard a guess that there was a long list of expenses being brought forward and we have only spent £500k purchasing Stephens this season whereas last year we bought Ulloa for £2m.

More seating at the Amex compared to the start of last season and higher gate averages brings in an extra £1-£2m.

I mentioned that front-loading costs was my hope / hunch earlier, but would really like El Pres or similar to say they have reviewed the accounts and, yes, this is so. Not enough detail available at present IMHO.
 


B.W.

New member
Jul 5, 2003
13,666
They were filed on the day of the press release. Companies House haven't managed to upload them yet though.......

Thank you, but still waiting, unfortunately.
 


Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
The club overspent last season deliberately. They brought foward expenses like the electronic advertising boards to avoid it going on this seasons accounts. I would hazard a guess that there was a long list of expenses being brought forward and we have only spent £500k purchasing Stephens this season whereas last year we bought Ulloa for £2m.

More seating at the Amex compared to the start of last season and higher gate averages brings in an extra £1-£2m.

Wasn't the pitch side electronic advertising costed at £1m to install? That should start paying for itself this season.
 








B.W.

New member
Jul 5, 2003
13,666
Wasn't the pitch side electronic advertising costed at £1m to install? That should start paying for itself this season.

Thank you TB. I think the ad boards are likely part of the (hopefully) temporary/once-off rise in costs.
 








nwgull

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2003
14,533
Manchester
The club overspent last season deliberately. They brought foward expenses like the electronic advertising boards to avoid it going on this seasons accounts. I would hazard a guess that there was a long list of expenses being brought forward and we have only spent £500k purchasing Stephens this season whereas last year we bought Ulloa for £2m.

More seating at the Amex compared to the start of last season and higher gate averages brings in an extra £1-£2m.

Average gates are only going to be about 1k higher this year, unless there's a surge towards the end of the season, so about £350-£400k extra.

As for transfer fees paid, I was under the impression that this went down as player contract amortisation; ie Ulloa, at 2m for a 4 year contract, will go down as a £500k pa cost each year. Although I've no idea how it works out when we renew or extend a deal.
 




As of 14.15hrs today the BHAFC Ltd Accounts were still not posted on the Companies House website, from personal experience this may take CH up to 2 weeks after receipt. Similarly, the 2012/13 Accounts for the Albion's holding company (BHA Holdings Ltd) and the stadium company (The Community Stadium Company Ltd) are not yet posted.
El Pres (Kieran Maguire) gave a balanced and objective review of the information that's currently in the public domain during Saturday's Albion Roar so, unless someone's looking to increase their post count exponentially, give it a listen - http://www.albionroar.co.uk/
 




B.W.

New member
Jul 5, 2003
13,666
As of 14.15hrs today the BHAFC Ltd Accounts were still not posted on the Companies House website, from personal experience this may take CH up to 2 weeks after receipt. Similarly, the 2012/13 Accounts for the Albion's holding company (BHA Holdings Ltd) and the stadium company (The Community Stadium Company Ltd) are not yet posted.
El Pres (Kieran Maguire) gave a balanced and objective review of the information that's currently in the public domain during Saturday's Albion Roar so, unless someone's looking to increase their post count exponentially, give it a listen - http://www.albionroar.co.uk/

Thank you Mr Dawson.
 






El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
40,006
Pattknull med Haksprut
Average gates are only going to be about 1k higher this year, unless there's a surge towards the end of the season, so about £350-£400k extra.

As for transfer fees paid, I was under the impression that this went down as player contract amortisation; ie Ulloa, at 2m for a 4 year contract, will go down as a £500k pa cost each year. Although I've no idea how it works out when we renew or extend a deal.

You'd spread the remaining value of the registration over the new contract period.
 


Goldstone1976

We Got Calde in!!
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Apr 30, 2013
14,124
Herts
You'd spread the remaining value of the registration over the new contract period.

Yep, exactly so. Unless the club took the opportunity to re-value the registration to a (presumably) higher level than the then current book value, which is something that historically the club haven't done (revaluations of intangibles, that is). I strongly doubt that they will start revaluations now as all that would do is push up the following years' depreciation charges.
 


El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
40,006
Pattknull med Haksprut
Yep, exactly so. Unless the club took the opportunity to re-value the registration to a (presumably) higher level than the then current book value, which is something that historically the club haven't done (revaluations of intangibles, that is). I strongly doubt that they will start revaluations now as all that would do is push up the following years' depreciation charges.

Agreed. They'd also end up reporting a lower profit if the player was eventually sold (for example, in the accounts for 2013 I would expect to see a profit on player disposals of about £1.3 million (Noone, and possibly Dobbie)).
 




Goldstone1976

We Got Calde in!!
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Apr 30, 2013
14,124
Herts
Yes, they would report a lower profit when the player was sold. In the season that the revaluation was done however, they'd have a one-time kicker to profit. It would be one way of meeting FFP requirements (illegitimately imo, but legal) if operationally things were tight. They'd pretty much have to revalue every player though; the auditors probably wouldn't let them revalue some players but not others. I don't expect to see the club deliberately change their accounting policies just to meet FFP though; I think they genuinely want to run a decent ship, and accounting policy changes just paper over the cracks.

I'll take your word on possible sale profits for 2013; I have no real data on that.
 


Footsoldier

Banned
May 26, 2013
2,904
Agreed. They'd also end up reporting a lower profit if the player was eventually sold (for example, in the accounts for 2013 I would expect to see a profit on player disposals of about £1.3 million (Noone, and possibly Dobbie)).

Just listened to your conversation on the Albion Roar and must say you came across as an ok person and was great entertainment to the listener, well from my point of view anyway. Could of listened for hours.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here