- Nov 11, 2009
- 12,271
To be clear - Ukraine is entitled to self-dertermination without interference from an outside power - and Russia must be condemned for its actions. However, NATO bears significant responsibility for the Russian invasion of Ukraine - over the past number of years Nato has expanded eastwards and has positioned troops, equipment and missiles in Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia and Romania - effectively threatening to encircle Russia if it continued this expansion.This war is the product of two competing imperialist blocs attempting to strengthen their military position.
The hypocrisy of the western powers is nauseating - While the west has been condeming Putin over the past 72 hours - they have backed the Saudi dictatorship to the hilt for the past 7 years in bombing Yemen into rubble and killing more than 400,000 people (and possibly as many as 700,000 people) in the process. They have said nothing in recent weeks about Israeli airstrikes in Damascus, Saudi airstrikes in Yemen, Turkish airstrikes in northern Iraq, American airstrikes in Somalia and an American special forces ground assault in Syria. All of these actions should be condemned just as the Russian invasion of Ukraine is condemned.
Youre wrong in much of that JRG. They're aren't many weapons or troops on the far Eastern flanks, or there wasn't before this insane gambit.
The idea that NATO is marching east to encircle Russia is a Kremlin narrative, besides it has nothing to do with what's happening here today. It was a false pretext.
All of the eastern flank newer EU/NATO nations were forced and subjugated under Moscow domination against their will. They had decades of puppet governments and were forced under Moscow's heel. Many uprisings were brutally put down and the movements yearning to be free from this shackle, like Solidarity were part of the reason the USSR collapsed.
Once it had, some of these nations of the Warsaw block took their one opportunity to join the ONLY collective defence union that could virtually guarantee their freedom from Moscow's imperial yoke. The Eastern flanks countries now free, moved westwards of their own volition and free sovereign choice.
Forced eastward oppression, chosen westward security for freedom.
We are not excused from imperialism, but we're not subjugating Iceland to join the UK.
Imperialism, spheres of influence are of previous centuries.
Any concerns on nato bases, troops can be resolved peacefully with binding agreements (which I may add Russia rarely honours)
Any sovereign nation can choose it's alliances. Turkey and Hungary are free to join Putin in his eurasian alliance abd submit to Moscow hegemony.
Poland, Lithuania, Latvia etc didn't choose that, and they chose the only mechanism to protect themselves from the revanchism Ukraine is experiencing today
Putin is terrified of freedom of speech, civic movements and a free and prosperous democracy of Slavs next door infecting his kleptocraric grip on power. Johnson said Putin must be seen to fail, Putin believes Ukrainian democracy must be seen to fail.
This is Putin paranoid self interest not Russian national interest.