Not too crowded .Just the once. Give me a chance.
Not too crowded .Just the once. Give me a chance.
Aah yes, but Russia DENY they ever target Ukrainian citizens...so that's cleared up thenStruggling to see how this alleged " provocation " by Ukrainian forces on Russian soil fits in with the current narrative. Putin states that UA forces fired on a civilian vehicle injuring the occupants including a child. But...every day Russia fires on civilians in Ukraine ? ...surely a but late for the old Cold War Provocation game now ?
Yes, I see the point, probably makes it easier for him to justify Russian War Crimes in Ukraine. I keep forgetting that the Russian media have been used by almost every Russian leader to spread disinformation and lies.It's for their domestic audience, don't forget the Russian people do not get shown any of the bombing on civilian targets in Ukraine. This is so he can generate anger towards the Ukrainians and inturn gaining Putin more support. This helps Putin in two ways gains him more support and takes attention away from the reasons for the war and to focus instead on hatred towards Ukraine.
A third reason is that he is desperate for more recruits ( who'll likely be dead within the month ). He wants ignorant volunteers.It's for their domestic audience, don't forget the Russian people do not get shown any of the bombing on civilian targets in Ukraine. This is so he can generate anger towards the Ukrainians and inturn gaining Putin more support. This helps Putin in two ways gains him more support and takes attention away from the reasons for the war and to focus instead on hatred towards Ukraine.
Trying to make sense of the crap they come out with is futile.Struggling to see how this alleged " provocation " by Ukrainian forces on Russian soil fits in with the current narrative. Putin states that UA forces fired on a civilian vehicle injuring the occupants including a child. But...every day Russia fires on civilians in Ukraine ? ...surely a but late for the old Cold War Provocation game now ?
I don't know about the changes in their cyber warfare, but they've been full on propaganda since the start, that hasn't really changed.I remember an article from the Royal United Services Institute a few months ago, saying that as Russia was losing the ground war, we should expect more focus from them on other fronts - cyber warfare, propaganda etc. I suspect we are moving into that phase of the war.
Yes, here's a couple of thoughts:Does anyone else sense that Russia's tactics are changing? False flags, false complaints, false bollocks, you name it.
I remember an article from the Royal United Services Institute a few months ago, saying that as Russia was losing the ground war, we should expect more focus from them on other fronts - cyber warfare, propaganda etc. I suspect we are moving into that phase of the war.
I think they're actually ramping it up to 11, when we thought the propaganda dial only goes up to 10.I don't know about the changes in their cyber warfare, but they've been full on propaganda since the start, that hasn't really changed.
That's good news about Zap not being shelled any more, at least for now.Yes, here's a couple of thoughts:
- I read a few days ago that cyber attacks on German companies and infrastructure have been increasing, and since Germany promised to send tanks (and not to veto other countries,) attacks have increased sharply
- Our family members in Zaporizhzhia City tell us they have had zero shells or missiles () for nearly 2 weeks now. Given they were being shelled about 3 days per week (since April), this might suggest a shortage of Russian ammo, or readying for a focus on another front. So, an increase in cyber, propaganda, false flag etc could be an alternative means of ,'attack' for the interim I guess.
Sergei Lavrov: Russian foreign minister laughed at for Ukraine war claims....
Sergei Lavrov: Russian foreign minister laughed at for Ukraine war claims....
That comes with too many risks.That's not something consumers can choose, the Western governments need to get together and understand the threat from China, and make laws to deal with it.
It's not a case of just immediately stopping trading with them. We should make plans where we trade more when they play nicely, and less when they don't. I'd like to see the free world sign a pact where we all deal with these anti-freedom countries together, such that they get hit hard when they decide to wage war etc.That comes with too many risks.
If you drive the Chinese into the arms of Russia where they are totally reliant on each other for trade then that would be free to replenish Russia's dwindling war arsenal.
At the moment they're probably providing drones and stuff through the backdoor. But if you take away their trading options with the west then they could start to provide arms openly and in larger quantities.
You might be right and in the future something to consider but at this moment in time the stakes are too high for UkrainiansIt's not a case of just immediately stopping trading with them. We should make plans where we trade more when they play nicely, and less when they don't. I'd like to see the free world sign a pact where we all deal with these anti-freedom countries together, such that they get hit hard when they decide to wage war etc.
At the moment China is at war with democratic countries, so they see it as in their interest to see places like Ukraine fail. If we allow them to supply Russia with weapons unpunished, then we're heading for a very dark future.