Is it PotG?
Thrifty non-licker
You still buy Christmas cards?
Yup, my great-aunt said that she couldn't blu-tack my text to her wall.
You still buy Christmas cards?
That's how I feel. He's telling us to stop helping Ukraine, or he'll nuke us. Imagine what would happen if we actually stopped. He could take over every ex-soviet country, and we'd have to sit and watch them all die. We mustn't do that.Bluff, but a scary one that probably does need calling. If Putin gets away with this he will be invigorated and won’t stop at Ukraine
That's how I feel. He telling us to stop helping Ukraine, or he'll nuke us. Imagine what would happen if we actually stopped. He could take over every ex-soviet country, and we'd have to sit and watch them all die. We mustn't do that.
Just had a pony on at 125s that we get nuked this year.
... post deleted
due to bad temper....... but man ,that Trig bloke is ...erm.... annoying..
Just had a pony on at 125s that we get nuked this year.
How will you collect your winnings?
Germany is onside with the oil ban;
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/germany-caves-eu-pressure-russian-oil-ban-b997162.html?amp
‘Germany caves to EU pressure over Russian oil ban’
'Russian forces will collapse in weeks, predicts military expert'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-europe-61252785 16:23
Russia's assault on Donbas has "sort of fizzled" and the battle for the region will be over in two to four weeks, says military expert Dr Mike Martin.
The war studies visiting fellow at King's College London says: "Basically the Russians are gonna run out of troops, and the Ukrainians are going to counterattack."
The Russians have squandered their one chance to take the region, he believes.
"They pulled all of these mauled units out of Kyiv, and then tried to reconstitute them for combat in the east," he explains.
But they were "bruised and damaged" by the battle for the Ukrainian capital and Russia failed to build them up and "do some bold manoeuvre".
And Martin says there has been a "major strategic shift" in the war, with the UK declaring its aim is to clear Russian forces from Ukraine, including Crimea.
He adds that UK Foreign Secretary Liz Truss is "wrong", however, to say this would take 10 years, insisting: "Russian forces will collapse before that, and we’ll see a coup."
And with the US announcing US$33bn (£26bn) of funding for Ukraine, "that is an extremely clear signal of intent", says Martin.
It also means Nato and the US have decided Vladimir Putin is bluffing about using nuclear weapons if Nato up the ante, he adds.'
Vladimir Putin could announce the mass mobilisation of Russians on May 9, Ben Wallace, the Defence Secretary, has said.
Mr Wallace said that Putin could declare that "we are now at war with the world's Nazis and we need to mass mobilise the Russian people".
He told LBC that the Russian leader had "failed" in "nearly all [of his] objectives".
He added: "We have to help Ukrainians effectively get the limpet off the rock and keep the momentum pushing them back".
Meanwhile, the British ambassador to Ukraine has announced the reopening of the embassy in the capital of Kyiv after it was temporarily relocated days before the Russian invasion began.
Tactical nuke incoming I reckon. A small warhead would explode the size of a football field, but signal a huge intent. There is no way Russia limp away from this war.
Tactical nuke incoming I reckon. A small warhead would explode the size of a football field, but signal a huge intent.
Is supplying weapons a massive risk? Countries have done it up to this point (not just this war) and no one has ever talked about nuclear weapons being the answer. It just seems like standard Russian threats. If this really is how they want the world to end, no one can stop them, but I'm sure plenty of them want life on earth to continue. And what about China - are they worried this will lead to nuclear war? If so, they need to talk sense into Putin - if not, then presumably they know it's a bluff.It IS a massive risk but I’m with you
Is supplying weapons a massive risk? Countries have done it up to this point (not just this war) and no one has ever talked about nuclear weapons being the answer. It just seems like standard Russian threats. If this really is how they want the world to end, no one can stop them, but I'm sure plenty of them want life on earth to continue. And what about China - are they worried this will lead to nuclear war? If so, they need to talk sense into Putin - if not, then presumably they know it's a bluff.
Can we not also say it's a risk to not supply them? If fear for what he'd do if the West showed such weakness and backed down while he committed genocide.