Uh_huh_him
Well-known member
- Sep 28, 2011
- 12,086
If they had wanted PPV to be a success they would have been more inventive with the cost model.
They clearly needed to keep the one off game price high, so as to not devalue their subscription charges.
I'm sure if they had offered £15 per game but had packages such as 3 games for £30. or £50 for all PV games for the month. then people would have been ok about it.
Nobody in Sky/BT wanted to make it work, as it will be much more lucrative for them to get all the games on their subscription services.
They clearly needed to keep the one off game price high, so as to not devalue their subscription charges.
I'm sure if they had offered £15 per game but had packages such as 3 games for £30. or £50 for all PV games for the month. then people would have been ok about it.
Nobody in Sky/BT wanted to make it work, as it will be much more lucrative for them to get all the games on their subscription services.