What’s created the culture on here is not criticism, but definitively calling for him to be sacked - 2 different things I feel.
If the argument is reduced to a binary one, then the result will be either backing him or sacking him.
Some people like the binary argument, revel in it, satirise it even. Doesn’t really help though.
Personally, as in the OP, I’m backing him but he isn’t without mistakes and failures as already stated. They’re on a scale where I’m sure there will be a big review of what can be improved, but there’s been enough evidence to see the direction those improvements can take us.
I get the feeling some people want him sacked simply because they don’t like the look of him or his mannerisms. When the argument gets down to that level, it’s not really worth acknowledging.
Spot on [emoji106]