Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[News] Middle East conflict



Billy the Fish

Technocrat
Oct 18, 2005
17,594
Haywards Heath
It's a weird parallel universe where someone is personally attacked for asking for further evidence of something a news paper article posted as 'claims'. I may have missed zeberdi drawing any kind of conclusion about this stuff but from what I saw he was simply asking for more information.

Whether the claims were true or not, my point was that the personal attacks and accusation on a poster asking for more information were way beyond the Pail and totally unnecessary. Surely the civilised and logical response was to provide the extra evidence requested?
Please explain what you mean by extra evidence?
 




Krafty

Well-known member
Apr 19, 2023
2,065
I expect you'll get some laughing emojis instead of evidence of deberdi supposed claims.

Anyway as I said these posters are best ignored as they don't add much to the discussion.
Yes, the laughing (mocking) emojis from @aolstudios and @cjd seem to now be commonplace on (what I thought was intended to be) a serious thread.

I do have suspicions that both accounts are being controlled by the same user.
 


Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
57,283
Back in Sussex
Yes, the laughing (mocking) emojis from @aolstudios and @cjd seem to now be commonplace on (what I thought was intended to be) a serious thread.

I do have suspicions that both accounts are being controlled by the same user.
I've not really paid attention to use of emojis, but if I see people using laughing emojis in a way I determine is mocking or similar, then I will act as per my earlier warning.

Again: no apologies/reasons/appeals will be listened to.

Act in good faith if you wish to retain access to this thread, and similar on NSC.
 








Greenbag50

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2016
501
Did you read the article you linked?

Either way, you can't hold kids responsible for the Hamas attacks.

I was about to ban at least one person from this thread, but I'll issue a final warning. There won't be any more. Next time people will be banned, permanently, from this thread.

I don't care what "side" you are on, please debate the subject. If you attack other posters directly then you will be removed from this thread and, potentially, the site completely.

No subsequent apologies/appeals/grovels/"What about..."s will be listened to.
I think that is a very reasonable position.
As the OP, if I didn’t start this thread, someone else would have.
I think to have the freedom to debate these very sensitive geo-political subjects is something we should be proud of being able to do in the UK freely, without state or Government interference or control.
Mindful of some of the countries/ cultures we are discussing, the citizens of these countries may not be afforded this right and are prosecuted for it, without any rule of law in attendance.
We should be thankful we live in such a country where freedom of speech is protected and we should, as a people be grateful we live in such a country where this is possible. Currently.
 




Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
6,905
Are we in some kind of weird parallel universe?

So the BBC, CNN, NYT, amongst others, are printing unsubstantiated claims.

But don't worry everyone, ignore those respected organisations because @Zeberdi has been on the Internet and found some proper evidence on a Palestinian only website called Electronic Infatada.

NYT investigation.

On the contrary, I simply highlighted that there seems to be a distinct lack of evidence for some of the claims. EI is not a ‘Palestinian only’ website in the sense it is aimed at Palestinians, it’s audience is broad, it is a fact finding organisation that tried to provide an objective Palestinian perspective on issues where that perspective is largely ignored - it has been used by major news organisations as a source and has won awards for it’s commitment to human rights.

This is their website

As for other MSM sources - I did not say they should be ‘ignored’ or debunked - I have simply said their access to source material has been largely controlled and provided by the Israeli Government and interviews with inherently biased witnesses... and I also agreed there were probably incidences of sexual violence. The claim made by Israel however that this was a systematic tool of terror perpetrated by Hamas on 7th October may possibly be open to question so needs a full independent inquiry.

I posted links and quotes from Npr and Reuters News agencies, both highly respected in global news media, less hyperbolic or morally outraged in their tone of reporting current affairs than many news sources and both independent news agencies - they said they could not verify all the accounts. I detailed the problematic evidentiary issues raised both by Israel and the NYT and other News outlets too so not just EI..

As I also quoted from the Reuters link above, Israel has said they are not willing to work with the UN commission of inquiry because they say “it is biased” (presumably because they are concurrently investigating Israel for genocide). A UN ‘serious and impartial investigation’ ( that Hamas is calling for) might undermine any systemic rape narratives that can help Israel revitalise demonisation of Hamas as a justification of the war in Gaza - at a time when international resistance to Israel’s destruction of Gaza and the mass indiscriminate killing of thousands of children and women is becoming increasingly problematic for Netanyahu’s leadership and agenda in Gaza.

Because of that potential conflict of interest, the claims Israel is making need to be critically analysed from all sides and any outcome based on a broad range of independent resources.

 
Last edited:




sydney

tinky ****in winky
Jul 11, 2003
17,965
town full of eejits
I was about to ban at least one person from this thread, but I'll issue a final warning. There won't be any more. Next time people will be banned, permanently, from this thread.

I don't care what "side" you are on, please debate the subject. If you attack other posters directly then you will be removed from this thread and, potentially, the site completely.

No subsequent apologies/appeals/grovels/"What about..."s will be listened to.
give us a clue...?
 




Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
6,905
Please explain what you mean by extra evidence?

It's a weird parallel universe where someone is personally attacked for asking for further evidence of something a news paper article posted as 'claims'. I may have missed zeberdi drawing any kind of conclusion about this stuff but from what I saw he was simply asking for more information.
Yes - exactly this. Very much in line with what Volker Turk, the United Nations high commissioner for human rights has also stated in a press conference in December:

‘Independent investigation needed

Meanwhile, Turk highlighted that Israel itself had not responded to his repeated requests for access to investigate the allegations independently.

"We take the allegations extremely seriously," he said, but "you need to go into quite some detailed examination of whether it's premeditated, whether it was widespread, systematic".

"I'm not in a position to confirm this."

He stressed that for weeks he had "asked the Israeli authorities... to deploy a team, my team, to monitor, document, investigate the issues of the horrific attacks on Israelis".

"I've repeated this call and I hope it will be heard but so far, I haven't received a response."

Even if access is denied, Turk said that "we will find other ways and means to talk to whoever we need to talk to … Atrocious forms of sexual violence need to be thoroughly investigated, and we need to make sure that justice is served," he said.

"That's what we owe the victims."’


Edit - A far left perspective

And a Jewish independent non-profit on information gathering before the IDF subsequently claimed to have evidence of systematic rape

 
Last edited:




Tom Hark Preston Park

Will Post For Cash
Jul 6, 2003
72,310
Yes - exactly this. Very much in line with what Volker Turk, the United Nations high commissioner for human rights has also stated in a press conference in December:

‘Independent investigation needed

Meanwhile, Turk highlighted that Israel itself had not responded to his repeated requests for access to investigate the allegations independently.

"We take the allegations extremely seriously," he said, but "you need to go into quite some detailed examination of whether it's premeditated, whether it was widespread, systematic".

"I'm not in a position to confirm this."

He stressed that for weeks he had "asked the Israeli authorities... to deploy a team, my team, to monitor, document, investigate the issues of the horrific attacks on Israelis".

"I've repeated this call and I hope it will be heard but so far, I haven't received a response."

Even if access is denied, Turk said that "we will find other ways and means to talk to whoever we need to talk to … Atrocious forms of sexual violence need to be thoroughly investigated, and we need to make sure that justice is served," he said.

"That's what we owe the victims."’


Edit - A far left perspective

And a Jewish independent non-profit on information gathering before the IDF subsequently claimed to have evidence of systematic rape

Sorry @Bozza and mods if this besmirches your edict for the thread. But this guy does not post on this thread in the manner of a normal poster on this site. This is something else. Half a dozen links and a thousand word treatise every time he posts? I mean, really? We're clearly being steered in a particular direction by a particular entity. Please feel free to ban me from this thread for pointing out what should be blatantly manipulative red flags. And, to clarify, this is not an 'ad hominem' attack - to use his favourite phrase - on the poster in question, it's an attack on the entity he is posting on behalf of
 
Last edited:


aolstudios

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2011
5,272
brighton
Sorry @Bozza and mods if this besmirches your edict for the thread. But this guy does not post on this thread in the manner of a normal poster on this site. This is something else. Half a dozen links and a thousand word treatise every time he posts? I mean, really? We're clearly being steered in a particular direction by a particular entity. Please feel free to ban me from this thread for pointing out what should be blatantly manipulative red flags. And, to clarify, this is not an 'ad hominem' attack - to use his favourite phrase - on the poster in question, it's an attack on the entity he is posting on behalf of
You're far from alone in this observation, @Tom Hark Preston Park
 


Bakero

Languidly clinical
Oct 9, 2010
14,881
Almería
Sorry @Bozza and mods if this besmirches your edict for the thread. But this guy does not post on this thread in the manner of a normal poster on this site. This is something else. Half a dozen links and a thousand word treatise every time he posts? We're clearly being steered in a particular direction by a particular entity. Please feel free to ban me from this thread for pointing out what are blatantly manipulative red flags

You mean he gives his opinion and provides sources to back it up?

Is that worse than the laughing emojis favoured by other posters?

To be honest, I prefer a post backed up by evidence to spurious claims based on nothing but bias, half-truth and hearsay.
 




pocketseagull

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2014
1,360
It's been very notable that throughout this thread those who support Israel's actions mostly haven't really brought much in constructive arguments.
We've had people trying to have the thread shut down, constant trolling by emojis and now persistent personal attacks. I know the world is a bit dumbed down now but seriously criticising someone who backs up their arguments as being a red flag is unreal.
 


Tom Hark Preston Park

Will Post For Cash
Jul 6, 2003
72,310
It's been very notable that throughout this thread those who support Israel's actions mostly haven't really brought much in constructive arguments.
We've had people trying to have the thread shut down, constant trolling by emojis and now persistent personal attacks. I know the world is a bit dumbed down now but seriously criticising someone who backs up their arguments as being a red flag is unreal.
Maybe, just maybe, those who support Israel's actions are as pissed off as Israel is with the cruel slaughter of innocents on October 7th. Which, lest we forget, is the worst attack on Jewish people since the Holocaust. Hamas knew exactly how Israel would respond to such inhuman savagery. And just like pre-October 7th they continue to conduct their cowardly war by using women and kids as human shields
 


Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
6,905
Please feel free to ban me from this thread for pointing out what are blatantly manipulative red flags …And, to clarify, this is not an 'ad hominem' attack - to use his favourite phrase - on the poster in question, it's an attack on the entity he is posting on behalf of
What are you accusing me of? Working for a terrorist organisation? And yes, of course it is an ad hominem attack to falsely accuse someone on NSC of supporting some Machiavellian ’entity’ in order to silence the views of someone you disagree with- there is no ‘entity’ and you know it.

And by the way your comments have ONLY been liked by the same posters that have posted strong pro-Israel positions, ignored moderate debate, ignored facts, accused others of anti-semitism, posted Islamophobic sentiments and trolled the thread through a number of means and made repeated personal attacks on others to the point being threatened with bans— nice company you keep.

You are very much in a minority, not just in the UK but in the World, in giving your completely unbridled support to how Israel is conducting its war on Hamas - even the US, Israel’s greatest ally, has been working for weeks behind the scenes to put pressure on Israel to make more effort to avoid civilian casualties:
 
Last edited:


Krafty

Well-known member
Apr 19, 2023
2,065
Maybe, just maybe, those who support Israel's actions are as pissed off as Israel is with the cruel slaughter of innocents on October 7th. Which, lest we forget, is the worst attack on Jewish people since the Holocaust. Hamas knew exactly how Israel would respond to such inhuman savagery. And just like pre-October 7th they continue to conduct their cowardly war by using women and kids as human shields
Personally, I don't think we should support either 'side' like it's a football match. This conflict has killed over 20,000 innocent civilians from Israel and Palestine. I believe that Hamas and the Israeli authorities are both responsible for this atrocity and should be condemned.
 




armchairclubber

Well-known member
Aug 8, 2010
1,658
Bexhill
Maybe, just maybe, those who support Israel's actions are as pissed off as Israel is with the cruel slaughter of innocents on October 7th. Which, lest we forget, is the worst attack on Jewish people since the Holocaust. Hamas knew exactly how Israel would respond to such inhuman savagery. And just like pre-October 7th they continue to conduct their cowardly war by using women and kids as human shields

Have you read this article? You can correct me if I'm wrong but I think it's written by a Jewish journalist born and living in Israel for a Jewish paper.

I'd say Netenyahu has shot himself in the foot, whatever Hamas actions.

And now he conveniently wants the Palestinians to pay for it.
 
Last edited:


Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
6,905
Personally, I don't think we should support either 'side' like it's a football match. This conflict has killed over 20,000 innocent civilians from Israel and Palestine. I believe that Hamas and the Israeli authorities are both responsible for this atrocity and should be criticised for their actions.
So do most people on this thread including me - Nobody here is supporting Hamas just to be clear or working for any organisation that does ( I work for a conservation organisation that carries out scientific surveys to track the impacts of climate change - despite what THPP would have people believe) - the people that need our support are the innocent civilians getting caught up in the war - those that died on 7/10, the families of the hostages still held in Gaza, the innocent civilians that have died in Lebanon, Syria and the West Bank refugee camps; the thousands of Gazans who have died and the million Gazans at immediate risk of starvation.
 
Last edited:


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here