[Albion] Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall **Singed for Chelsea 02/07/2024**

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



redoubtable seagull

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2004
2,611
I still find 150K a week very hard to believe for a player that attracted the highest transfer fee paid in Premier League history and had another massive club trying to sign him in the same window.
Not when you factor in he was signed on an 8 (eight!) year contract and there’s been no disclosure on what bonuses he might get.
 




Grizz

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 5, 2003
1,493
I wonder if we put the feelers out about KDH again in the summer, to put Chelsea and others off the scent of our real target, O'Riley? Weren't we the only one to show interest? I know it's early doors, but he does come across as one of the most level headed, intelligent footballers I've heard for a long time.
 


Wozza

Custom title
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
24,372
Minteh Wonderland
I still find 150K a week very hard to believe for a player that attracted the highest transfer fee paid in Premier League history and had another massive club trying to sign him in the same window.
It's Chelsea's strategy to pay low wages... topped up with bonuses.

From https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2024/08/13/cole-palmer-chelsea-two-year-contract-extension/

Chelsea’s average wage bill was understood to be more than £200,000-a-week under Roman Abramovich’s ownership. That has now been significantly cut to an average of around £60,000-a-week, with big incentives for individual and team achievements.
 


Lady Whistledown

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
47,625
It's Chelsea's strategy to pay low wages... topped up with bonuses.

From https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2024/08/13/cole-palmer-chelsea-two-year-contract-extension/

Chelsea’s average wage bill was understood to be more than £200,000-a-week under Roman Abramovich’s ownership. That has now been significantly cut to an average of around £60,000-a-week, with big incentives for individual and team achievements.

"Low" is of course a relative term, and compares only to the £300,000+ per week they were paying other players in the past (and probably still are in the case of Lukaku).

Their wage bill will still be substantially higher on average than pretty much every club outside of Liverpool, City, United and Arsenal,one would think.
 


Wozza

Custom title
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
24,372
Minteh Wonderland
"Low" is of course a relative term, and compares only to the £300,000+ per week they were paying other players in the past (and probably still are in the case of Lukaku).

Their wage bill will still be substantially higher on average than pretty much every club outside of Liverpool, City, United and Arsenal,one would think.
Sure, but the common misconception is that Chelsea still pay crazy-high wages to lure players - when actually it's just silly transfer fees and, er, very long contracts.

I guess the bonus-heavy contracts keeps players hungry for game time. Must doubly piss-off players like KDH who don't get minutes though.
 




dejavuatbtn

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2010
7,573
Henfield
"Low" is of course a relative term, and compares only to the £300,000+ per week they were paying other players in the past (and probably still are in the case of Lukaku).

Their wage bill will still be substantially higher on average than pretty much every club outside of Liverpool, City, United and Arsenal,one would think.
Ah, it’s wonderful that their fingers are still burning.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top