Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

iPhone 6 / iPhone 6 Plus / Apple Watch







Goldstone Rapper

Rediffusion PlayerofYear
Jan 19, 2009
14,865
BN3 7DE
The screen isn't the problem, it's that the "digital crown" and button are on the right hand side.

Edit: just found this

"Update: So, it turns out the Apple Watch really works TWO ways. Apple tells us on initial setup, you can choose to have the watch face orient itself for use on the right wrist, making it friendly to lefties. The watch bands are also swappable, so your band isn't facing the wrong way. Good news for everyone involved, but like most things in life, Lefties will still have to deal with a right-handed design -- the crown will be on the bottom of the left side of the watch when on the right wrist."

So it flips it upside down but making the crown in the bottom left. Still a bit awkward.

Surely, for left-handed people, it makes sense for the crown to be on the left-side (the nearest side to the operating hand) when worn on the right wrist?
 


Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
62,692
The Fatherland
Disagree. They tend to only release decent products. The shit ones (the old Apple TV) don't sell well at all. When they changed the iPod Nano, shit sales. When they changed the shuffle. Shit sales.

They've certainly got more than their fair share of fanboys, but most of the time the reason for the sales is the quality of the product on offer.

This. Plus, don't forget their incredible second to none after sales service.
 


Beach Hut

Brighton Bhuna Boy
Jul 5, 2003
72,315
Living In a Box
This. Plus, don't forget their incredible second to none after sales service.

I think a lot of people become anti companies due to massive success, personally I admire that success as employers will buy into it and want to do things better.

Why would Argos, who have designed and commissioned their own tablet be equipping their shops for customer retail purposes with iPads ?
 






hitony

Administrator
Jul 13, 2005
16,284
South Wales (im not welsh !!)
i'm hoping the price on the 5s will a good amount drop and then i'll pop back to an iPhone

I hope your wrong, I only bought one 3 weeks ago :) to be honest i'm really not bothered what it drops to, I was happy with the price I paid for a new 5s and it is a great phone, I did know the 6 was coming out but as i say i'm very happy with what I have.
 


LamieRobertson

Not awoke
Feb 3, 2008
48,419
SHOREHAM BY SEA
I hope your wrong, I only bought one 3 weeks ago :) to be honest i'm really not bothered what it drops to, I was happy with the price I paid for a new 5s and it is a great phone, I did know the 6 was coming out but as i say i'm very happy with what I have.

glad u make sense of my post ...ive just reread it :ffsparr:

16gb on ebay brand new seem to be around the 380 mark...not sure they will move much from there...but i'm not in a hurry
 


Wilko

LUZZING chairs about
Sep 19, 2003
9,927
BN1
I had the s5 on ultra power saving mode and it lasted more than a week whilst camping, I think it was anticipated to last about 12 days from a full charge

Having owned iphones and Galaxys I much prefer the Samsung and have found the battery life to be far better. *ducksforcover*
 




Nibble

New member
Jan 3, 2007
19,238
Apple have missed their mouth on the watch thing. Wearables won't take off. People just think they are naff.
 


Rookie

Greetings
Feb 8, 2005
12,324
Apple have missed their mouth on the watch thing. Wearables won't take off. People just think they are naff.

While I don't see the point in them, isn't that what people were saying about the iPod, iPad etc
 


Nibble

New member
Jan 3, 2007
19,238
While I don't see the point in them, isn't that what people were saying about the iPod, iPad etc

No, I dont think they were at all. People leapt on them. Phones, specs, monitors, people just aren't interested. Apple are fast becoming seen as rather naff, whether it be their labour issues, battery life, pricing, scrabbling for pointless new features, each phone being the same. They have had their time i think.
 




Vegas Seagull

New member
Jul 10, 2009
7,782
The watch uses your phone to do stuff, you need your phone on you when using the watch, the watch is basically a fancy remote for phone

Not that useful then...what they need to do is make it standalone so it's all you need and/or waterproof so you can take you're swimming etc, can't see it's use if your easier to use iPhone is in your pocket. They went into collaboration with YSL they should have got into bed with Rolex and brought out a £3k one
 


Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
37,341
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
Apple have missed their mouth on the watch thing. Wearables won't take off. People just think they are naff.

Geeks don't. There is a guy in my office already using a Samsung wearable. There is a fairly decent uptake on things like Fitbit too. They have interesting implications for a number of sectors and occupations. For example health screening for occupations like the police and military, collecting data to help life and health underwriting the same way as the driving sensors are now influencing car insurance and improvements to hands free communication so that people can truly write emails by simply talking out loud and receive calls by flicking their watch.

I remember a lot of people scoffing at the iPad when it came out and saying it was just a giant iPhone without a phone. Turns out they were wrong.
 






Goring-by-Seagull

Well-known member
Jan 5, 2012
1,981
Surely, for left-handed people, it makes sense for the crown to be on the left-side (the nearest side to the operating hand) when worn on the right wrist?

Yeah, but bottom left. Why not put the crown in the middle on one side and button on the other?

Anyway I really want one and will make do with with the crown a bit lower down.
 




beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,015
Geeks don't. There is a guy in my office already using a Samsung wearable. There is a fairly decent uptake on things like Fitbit too. They have interesting implications for a number of sectors and occupations. For example health screening for occupations like the police and military, collecting data to help life and health underwriting the same way as the driving sensors are now influencing car insurance and improvements to hands free communication so that people can truly write emails by simply talking out loud and receive calls by flicking their watch.

geeks do not make a viable mass consumer market. the fitness sector shows there's a demand for "wearable" devices, but also that there's already a lot of competition, offering far cheaper solutions. one comment i read said they aren't going to ditch their trusty, well-battered running watch, for an expensive Apple device that would break. i know a sample of one, but illustrates the problem of that market need robust devices. the tech has been available for years, why isn't there other uses? because everyone has a smartphone, and they don't really need a remote control for it.
 


Nibble

New member
Jan 3, 2007
19,238
I don't know what the iPad is like now but I got shot of mine mainly because it was cumbersome and you could only have one window open at a time. Most people just let their kids play on them don't they? About all they are good for.
 




StonehamPark

#Brighton-Nil
Oct 30, 2010
10,133
BC, Canada
I'd much prefer the Nike+ Fuel Band.
Looks neater (imo) and does all the fitness stuff I'd need as well as sync very well to the iPhone
Oh, and it's about £200.00 cheaper.

HE382


Apple Store - Fuel Band
 


wehatepalace

Limbs
NSC Patron
Apr 27, 2004
7,332
Pease Pottage
I love apple tech but I doubt I'll buy the watch, for one reason only, it's not waterproof.
I very rarely take my watch off, I also swim everyday, the watch would have been handy for that, with all the fitness stuff on there.
Shame I like the idea but for me it's no good.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here