i think the concerns are you perspectives warrant some sort inclusion into an institution or at the very least medication.Yes I believe this, Yes i agree it's f**ked up. No, it's not doing my head-in that none of you believe me, believe it or not, that's down to you. Why should it bother me? Are we not allowed to have different perspectives anymore?
Yes, I already have in my first post. Can you read it, it's very simple too.
The biggest contradiction of a post if you'll ever find one. The User hasn't even read my info i've posted up! (otherwise he would of quoted it)
Good post.I find it amusing that the overwhelming majority of people who post conspiracy theories haven't actually done any research. There are a handful of people who come up with the theories, often flawed, but they put the effort in to developing these "theories".
But there are people who once they have read one of these theories accepts it, and any "evidence" that is presented to support it (no matter how fraudulent it is, no matter how much something has been twisted or misrepresented (the flags aren't even singed! - yeah, neither were the upper bodies of the people who lost legs, kind suggests the force of the explosion was not particularly high off the ground more than suggesting the entire thing was staged)) without question. They parrot it.
Then they go around accusing anyone who doesn't blindly agree with them as being gullible, falling for the mainstream media's supposed news.
They put as little effort or thought into filtering and fact checking the theories they spew, as they are accusing those that dismiss them of putting into main stream news. It's laughable really.
They demand evidence to either disprove their theory or to support the MSM's version. In both cases they dismiss any evidence as fake, or part of the cover up. If there is something (as yet) unanswered, it is leapt upon and held up as a sign that it is impossible for the official story to be true.Yet gaps in their own logic/theories are acceptable, part of the process.
It's why it is pointless arguing with conspiracy theorists, and that pointlessness is why people prefer to just call them loons, and tell them to get lost. Much easier than putting the effort into an argument that will just be ignored.
The BBC will feed you with the exact same angle you have with terrorism. The BBC is a peado ring.
I did, and I did not see the indisputable proof that you saw, but that's not my point. You know in your heart that the whole thing is a setup, and we're all too stupid to see it (for clarity, I'm not being patronising here, I'm simply stating how this must all look from your point of view), and I would imagine that's very difficult to deal with.And did you read it?
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Oh ****ing shit, what are you smoking, brah?
Did you even read it or are you just hoping to somehow wind me up?
Whatever it is i want some.
I'm keeping well away if that's how you end up.