London Irish
Well-known member
Thimble Keegan said:I know Virgo is good in defence but so is Hinshelwood & Butters and they can cope. No one can deny that when Virgo plays up-front he is better than McCammon.
I agree with you that Virgo is probably a better targetman than Big Mac, but that's because Virgs is an exceptional player who does not quite get the recognition he deserves for being potentially our finest player. When Virgs went up front yesterday, he was not only better than Big Mac but also Leon, who lost many of his physical battles with the Leeds defenders. So that doesn't mean we now drop both Big Mac and Leon, does it?
Can the defence cope without Virgs. Maybe. But I would suggest Derby is not a good team to try out that theory. Derby have one of the most lethal forward lines in this division and they took us to the cleaners not so long ago when we didn't have Virgs at the back.
We will need him there to cope with the threat of their array of small but very quick and skilful strikers/wingers plus the bigger Rasiak.
Alas we can't clone Virgs and have him in the team twice so McGhee has to make hard tactical choices. We will need to structure the team with neutralising Derby's potent threat in mind. Big Mac will therefore be needed again up front to disrupt the relatively young and inexperienced Derby defenders, although I admit McGhee will think hard about whether he starts or is used as impact from the bench - whatever, he will certainly be playing a role in trying to extend our unbeaten run.
The question of whether we can find a better targetman at the end of the season than Big Mac is a moot one. McGhee wouldn't be signing him if he thought we could get better than him. McGhee knows what's out there and what we can afford. He's in a better position to judge this than our ill-informed guesswork on here.
Last edited: