skipper734
Registered ruffian
A lot of this appears to make no sense. Would seem that the stewards are just as culpable as any others involved.
See Dave Ryan has left the team
As an outsider I have actually followed this story as I find I'm morbidly fascinated with a 'sport' that has such a mess of arcane rules and regulations that the result of a procession of cars (sometimes inaccurately called a 'race') is still in doubt days or even weeks after the event.
As a neutral it seems to me that Hamilton is a best a slightly dishonest competitor seeking to gain an advantage by not revealing what had been said in the radio conversation and thus allowing Trulli to be incorrectly penalised. At worst he's a lying cheat who I hope never 'wins' another procession.
Actually I DID have an interest in it when I was a boy. My Dad used to be the accountant for a guy called John Surtees who was a racing driver back in the 1960s. I remember him once driving our Triumph Herald round country lanes in a way my parents never did!Admit it, you're just fighting an instinct that tells you that this is an interesting sport...you'll find yourself watching sometime soon and then you'll be hooked
Having listened to the radio between Hamilton and his pit crew (it's on the BBC website) I really can't see what they've done wrong. They followed the rules, gave the place back and then afterwards went to the stewards and basically said 'we gave this place back, we don't know if we had to and without doing so we clearly would have been third'. I doubt they were trying to get Trulli disqualified as originally happened. It's bizarre, the FIA should have just decided to classify one of them third and one fourth and left it at that.
Actually I DID have an interest in it when I was a boy. My Dad used to be the accountant for a guy called John Surtees who was a racing driver back in the 1960s. I remember him once driving our Triumph Herald round country lanes in a way my parents never did!
Easy 10;2878287 . I'm fairly disgusted with Hamilton if indeed that is how this thing played out.[/QUOTE said:I hope you are equally disgusted at Albion players flinging themselves to the ground in the penalty area, when no contact has been made and clutching their faces when they've been pushed in the back?
I hope you are equally disgusted at Albion players flinging themselves to the ground in the penalty area, when no contact has been made and clutching their faces when they've been pushed in the back?
If thats how this thing panned out, then (a) the stewards are SHITE for not fully checking the replay and the radio conversations before arriving at their decision, and (b) Hamilton/McLaren deserve to have the BOOK thrown at them for deliberately trying to take advantage of the sheer stupidity of the stewarding. I'm fairly disgusted with Hamilton if indeed that is how this thing played out.
Having seen that Trulli had been demoted for overtaking during the safety car, when Hamilton/McLaren were later asked for their version of events on the incident, they had a clear choice. Having done the right thing at the time, the sportsmanlike thing in letting Trulli back through, they could have explained it all to the stewards, taken 4th, and let Trulli have his rightful 3rd.
Instead, when it became apparent the stewards were clueless, they kept schtum in the sneaking hope of inheriting 3rd place at Trulli's expense. Then when directly asked whether it was discussed over the radio, they stupidly (inexplicably) lied about it in order to maintain 3rd.
What a grotty, grubby team and driver. For the sake of gaining ONE place, they have permanently stained their reputations. I'd be embarrassed for them if I wasn't so revolted.
Yeah, I've just googled him and found he wasn't 'just' a racing driver in the 1960s - he was the bleedin' world champion in 1964!John Surtees Motorbike world champion and then F1 world champion, I'm impressed
The thing is though, because Trulli made a mistake and went off the road is the third place rightly his? It seems McLaren wanted clarification as to whether Hamilton's pass of him was legal (hence taking the safe option of letting him through) but then rather stupidly didn't tell the whole story when asked about it. Though as others have said the stewards really should have checked the radios too...
For the sake of gaining ONE place, they have permanently stained their reputations.
the stewards just used further evidence (radios) to justify their punishment, if they listened to every radio stream and went down all other avenues possible on every incident in the race then incidents like these would'nt be cleared up for weeks later.
Its abit like a criminal being convicted:
1st he gets away with it after blatantly lying
2nd the Police then search and find further evidence
3rd Police then act appropriately