Elder for England
New member
- Jan 30, 2008
- 2,388
Why the need to do this?
I know most people (if not all) won't agree but I do think the fans have to take some responsibilty for the way things are going of late.
Confidence has a huge part to play! People seem to forget that we had a good start to the season, even had a bit of a run going as well, we had a couple of bad games and things changed very quickly. I know most people (if not all) won't agree but I do think the fans have to take some responsibilty for the way things are going of late. People started to question the team in SEPTEMBER, already slating Adams, criticising the players when our record stood at 5 wins, 4 draws and 2 loses.
Why the need to do this?
I think people had started to question ADAMS by then, rather than the players, to be fair.
And given that even during that relatively succesful spell we'd seen the side fail to break down Orient, Bristol Rovers, and ten-man Walsall, seen points gifted away through late goals against Northampton and Yeovil, and watched them roll up and die against Scunthorpe, I'd say they were right.
Every fear people expressed about selection and tactics back then HAS been borne out. What is your point, exactly?
People started to question the team in SEPTEMBER, already slating Adams, criticising the players when our record stood at 5 wins, 4 draws and 2 loses.
Why the need for constant and spiteful opinion about Wilkins, stated as fact?
Because we hadnt won a home game, and that is what the majority of our fans watch. 5 wins included only 2 in the league, both away from home.
4 draws, of which 2 were drab 0-0's.
Yes the record was good, it saw us progress in the JPT and Carling Cup. But we were never really convincing in any game bar Southend away. Crewe we played well, and let them back in it, and were lucky we got a winner at the death.
Some of the tactics and choices Adams has made haven't been good, but they're nowhere near as bad as what people make out. When people talk about players postioning, were people complaning about Virgo in midfield when he was getting goals at the beginning of the season? Have people thought that Adams, just like the rest of us thought maybe we were onto something with him there and slowly it becamse worse, is it not possible he was left there for a few remaining games because of the great start? Game after game it became aparant it no longer worked and he hasn't been put there since. When was the last time Virgo played in midfield? Adams is yet to know what is his best 11.
So obviously, the very next game he is shifted to right back, to accomodate the must-pick Hawkins. As previously discovered, Virgs can't actually play right back, so spent to whole game drifting inside, leaving a big whole for Stockport to slaughter us down.
This shower is not fit to wear the shirt. Forster is always licking whatever manager is in at the time.
Not helped by a totally inept performance from Stuart Fleetwood. Also playing out of position.
Not helped by a totally inept performance from Stuart Fleetwood. Also playing out of position.
I have not got great links with the club - but what I do hear is that there were problems between senior players and Wilkins ( and not just the ones he was not playing) and it looked at times as if some of the younger ones had issues. Whilst it is early days with Adams his reputation is that players do like and respect the bloke.
Of course this is all in the nature of a club and team - but I think Elder's point is valid that the players do have more time for Adams than Wilkins.
I couldn't give a f*** how much time the players have for the manager, they could hate him for all I care. All that matters is that the manager gets the players playing in the correct positions and operating as a team. Adams currently doesn't seem to want to do this and it's almost ruined our league campaign.
I have not got great links with the club - but what I do hear is that there were problems between senior players and Wilkins ( and not just the ones he was not playing) and it looked at times as if some of the younger ones had issues. Whilst it is early days with Adams his reputation is that players do like and respect the bloke.
Of course this is all in the nature of a club and team - but I think Elder's point is valid that the players do have more time for Adams than Wilkins.