Tell me what i've said that is stupid in that post ? According to your standards , because we committed atrocities in the 19th and 20th centuries , we have no right to judge people who do the same now , am I right ?
No, what was stupid was your assertion that what happened in Rwanda and other parts of Africa is 'endemic, engrained in their culture' - implying that these atrocities don't happen elsewhere. Your assertion to BadFish that atrocities elsewhere (e.g. the Balkans) are isolated while they are frequent in Africa is, I would suggest, wrong.
Despite what selective attention to media reports might suggest, Africa in general is not rife with inter-ethnic violence. Conflict exists, of course, but mostly in specific places, as it does in all other parts of the world (Thailand or Central Asia, for example, let alone the bloody recent history of Europe).
I would add that your implication that violence is endemic across Africa, as if all of Africa is culturally the same, is also completely misguided. What has happened in Darfur and South Sudan, for example, has been the product of an Arab-African conflict - very different from Rwanda, eastern Congo or Cote d'Ivoire, for example.