severnside gull
Well-known member
What a bizarre comment. His opinion is far from irrelevant and where have I rewritten history?
As for your so called apology, why would he admit to rape when he believes it was consensual. How is that going to stand up with his claim of innocence and the process currently going through CCRC!
You would hold your hand up and admit you are a rapist even if you know a girl you had sex with had definitely said yes? I find that a very odd admission to make.
?
Please do read before you respond.
His opinion of whether his actions were right or wrong is entirely irrelevant to the fact that a court of law found him guilty of rape.
You are (or appear to be) suggesting that because he says it was untrue then it must be so. That is rewriting factual history insofar as a court of law found against him.
I have not said I would admit to rape if I thought I had not committed it. I have said that I would accept that a court of law had found against me (no matter I continued to protest innocence) and that insofar as I accept the rule of law I was remorseful towards the victim for the hurt they had suffered.
I am not overly clear why some people are happy to accept his evidence and discount that of the victim even when a court accepted her version and her right to say no. However I would expand on that. In his circumstances I would have indicated my remorse for their hurt even if I had been found not guilty. That is called compassion and an awareness of what is acceptable in ones behaviour within society.
The CCRC process as I understand it is not an appeal and is not about guilt or innocence but about legal process.
At this stage however, an indication of remorse for the suffering caused might well go in his favour in many respects
Last edited: