Scoopa Nan also Wayne Rooney's favourite game at the fairground.
pasta - help me out with this one. Nigel Farage - the man of the people who goes to the pub dressed as Rupert The Bear - used to say something like there'd be this 'uprising the like of which this country has never seen before' if whatever it is he wants wasn't delivered because it's a 'betrayal' but like most things with Brexit the actual details were sketchy to say the least.
I'm thinking a couple of thousand people - Free Stephen Yaxley-Lennon protest numbers, who'll probably be there too raging if his probation terms allow it - made of knuckle draggers, oddballs, ex-football hooligans (daytime TV and banning orders permitting if the demo is too close to a ground) greasy haired woman from Essex and Regal cigarette smokers from Barnsley who had to vote for Brexit 'cos ders tooo menee Mooslims'.
I hope this is tongue in cheek otherwise it reeks of intellectual superiority and that is not a smell I particularly enjoy.
It might surprise a few on this thread but 17.4m people weren't entirely made up of racist thicko's who haven't got a clue what is going on. In my acquaintance, I know lawyers, solicitors, financiers, teachers, entrepreneurs, designers, consultants, public sector workers and all manner of business people who voted Leave and haven't changed their minds. Difficult to grasp. I know, but there you go. A whole cross section of people voted Remain and a whole cross section of people voted Leave.
It is clear, that since 2016, it serves some people's purpose to categorise those who differ in view to them.
She said it when she was fairly confident her deal would get through. It didn't although she tried three times.
I hope this is tongue in cheek otherwise it reeks of intellectual superiority and that is not a smell I particularly enjoy.
It might surprise a few on this thread but 17.4m people weren't entirely made up of racist thicko's who haven't got a clue what is going on. In my acquaintance, I know lawyers, solicitors, financiers, teachers, entrepreneurs, designers, consultants, public sector workers and all manner of business people who voted Leave and haven't changed their minds. Difficult to grasp. I know, but there you go. A whole cross section of people voted Remain and a whole cross section of people voted Leave.
It is clear, that since 2016, it serves some people's purpose to categorise those who differ in view to them.
Government said no deal is better than a bad deal......how does that fit your argument
Kate Hoey standing down as a Labour MP (no doubt going before she is pushed, and promised something by Nigel).
I hope this is tongue in cheek otherwise it reeks of intellectual superiority and that is not a smell I particularly enjoy.
It might surprise a few on this thread but 17.4m people weren't entirely made up of racist thicko's who haven't got a clue what is going on. In my acquaintance, I know lawyers, solicitors, financiers, teachers, entrepreneurs, designers, consultants, public sector workers and all manner of business people who voted Leave and haven't changed their minds. Difficult to grasp. I know, but there you go. A whole cross section of people voted Remain and a whole cross section of people voted Leave.
It is clear, that since 2016, it serves some people's purpose to categorise those who differ in view to them.
I voted remain before and I would vote remain again if there was another vote, but I don't think there should be one. All the stuff about the 2016 vote being 'advisory' is a smokesreen, people voted on the basis that the government would accede to a majority decision, and therefore that should be the case.
If another vote did take place then even if there was a swing towards remain at most it would be something like 53-47, which is not a significant mandate and would leave more people being disenfranchised than there are at present. Even so there's a fair chance that the next vote would still be to leave the EU, the margins are too tight to call.
The attitude taken by many remain supporters towards those that voted leave has contributed towards leavers doubling down in their position and if I'd voted leave I suspect I would have done the same.
Leave voters are not all racists (although all racists did vote leave), they are not all stupid. Remain voters constantly pecking at them in respect of the economic costs of Brexit is irrelevant as Leavers didn't vote for Brexit because of its impact on GDP. Equally a bit more thought from Leavers in terms of the impact that Brexit has upon Northern Ireland, supply chains and those industries that benefit from EU wide grants and funds would make sense too, as industries such as mine have been significantly hit by the vote in terms of exports and employment.
The EU is bureaucratic, costly and has systemic weaknesses that allow corruption and patronage, all valid criticisms. The economic benefits of a single market, protection of worker and consumer rights and freedom of movement for me outweigh those costs, but if something thinks the opposite their viewpoint and vote should be respected.
What has happened since the vote has been an embarrassment on both sides, culminating with the "oh aren't we so smug Bollocks to Brexit" T shirts being worn by the Lib Dems and the ignorant childishness of the Brexit party turning their backs last week.
What should be done now is politicians acting in an adult manner to negotiate a deal that will minimise the economic damage of Brexit, especially the lunacy of a no deal one. It's better to lose two fingers than a whole hand and that should be the aim. We've had a decade of low growth due to the destruction of the global economy due to the activities of bankers, accountants and lawyers, we should now do our best to negotiate a relationship with the EU that allows for trade, co-operation and peaceful coexistence.
What we are seeing instead is self serving and manipulative politicians telling whatever lies they think will most impress a small section of society to increase their power base, and that is irresponsible and unforgiveable...but representative of the times we live in.
Vote Labour
I voted remain before and I would vote remain again if there was another vote, but I don't think there should be one. All the stuff about the 2016 vote being 'advisory' is a smokesreen, people voted on the basis that the government would accede to a majority decision, and therefore that should be the case.
If another vote did take place then even if there was a swing towards remain at most it would be something like 53-47, which is not a significant mandate and would leave more people being disenfranchised than there are at present. Even so there's a fair chance that the next vote would still be to leave the EU, the margins are too tight to call.
The attitude taken by many remain supporters towards those that voted leave has contributed towards leavers doubling down in their position and if I'd voted leave I suspect I would have done the same.
Leave voters are not all racists (although all racists did vote leave), they are not all stupid. Remain voters constantly pecking at them in respect of the economic costs of Brexit is irrelevant as Leavers didn't vote for Brexit because of its impact on GDP. Equally a bit more thought from Leavers in terms of the impact that Brexit has upon Northern Ireland, supply chains and those industries that benefit from EU wide grants and funds would make sense too, as industries such as mine have been significantly hit by the vote in terms of exports and employment.
The EU is bureaucratic, costly and has systemic weaknesses that allow corruption and patronage, all valid criticisms. The economic benefits of a single market, protection of worker and consumer rights and freedom of movement for me outweigh those costs, but if something thinks the opposite their viewpoint and vote should be respected.
What has happened since the vote has been an embarrassment on both sides, culminating with the "oh aren't we so smug Bollocks to Brexit" T shirts being worn by the Lib Dems and the ignorant childishness of the Brexit party turning their backs last week.
What should be done now is politicians acting in an adult manner to negotiate a deal that will minimise the economic damage of Brexit, especially the lunacy of a no deal one. It's better to lose two fingers than a whole hand and that should be the aim. We've had a decade of low growth due to the destruction of the global economy due to the activities of bankers, accountants and lawyers, we should now do our best to negotiate a relationship with the EU that allows for trade, co-operation and peaceful coexistence.
What we are seeing instead is self serving and manipulative politicians telling whatever lies they think will most impress a small section of society to increase their power base, and that is irresponsible and unforgiveable...but representative of the times we live in.
Are you sure you posted this exellent post under the correct account ?
They've made it clear they don't want my vote.
A bit like the remain voters shrieking at those who vote leave, I've had too many accusations from the Momentum version of Labour that is now in charge in terms of being a Tory (I've never voted for them in my life) a Blairite etc etc and so I've doubled down myself.
all governments say a lot of things,they always have
No it didn't - you're confusing the leave campaign with the government.
The attitude taken by many remain supporters towards those that voted leave has contributed towards leavers doubling down in their position and if I'd voted leave I suspect I would have done the same.
Leave voters are not all racists (although all racists did vote leave), they are not all stupid. Remain voters constantly pecking at them in respect of the economic costs of Brexit is irrelevant as Leavers didn't vote for Brexit because of its impact on GDP. Equally a bit more thought from Leavers in terms of the impact that Brexit has upon Northern Ireland, supply chains and those industries that benefit from EU wide grants and funds would make sense too, as industries such as mine have been significantly hit by the vote in terms of exports and employment.
That's somewhat splitting hairs .... she was PM - head of the government. I think it's pretty safe to say that if the PM says something, unless they highlight it as a personal view, then it is the government saying it.