Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Brexit

If there was a second Brexit referendum how would you vote?


  • Total voters
    1,099


ManOfSussex

We wunt be druv
Apr 11, 2016
15,168
Rape of Hastings, Sussex
I think the term "alternative arrangements" was sufficiently vague to allow all to attach their own desires to what the alternative might be. It's becoming a familiar tactic.

When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean - neither more nor less."

"The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things."

humpty-dumpty.gif
 




JC Footy Genius

Bringer of TRUTH
Jun 9, 2015
10,568
You've completely ignored my point about to what extent the lies were decisive. It would only have taken 1 Leave voter in 28 to have swung the vote to Remain. I'm pretty certain the NHS bus by itself would have grabbed the 700,000 votes that proved decisive.

That point would fall by the wayside if we'd got a Deal, but we were promised one by all the main protagonists, including May's famous "Red, White and Blue Brexit" and we aren't going to get one. Parliament voted to trigger Article 50 but Parliament also voted against No Deal - it shows how clueless they are.

I honestly don't think in the 2 years since triggering Article 50 the EU have done anything that has surprised me - their actions were entirely foreseeable and predictable.

No one knows what effect particular lies on either side had on voting intentions. You say 700,000 votes swayed by the NHS bus claim I could say 500,000 votes swayed by the immediate recession and half a million more unemployed claim.

We were also told no deal is better than a bad deal although May seems intent on reneging on that promise too.

Agree with your last point I bet they can't believe their luck how weak and inept our negotiating strategy has been ... unfortunately for them and us, the deal is so poor it couldn't even get through the HoC, to no one's surprise.
 






Bold Seagull

strong and stable with me, or...
Mar 18, 2010
30,463
Hove
No one knows what effect particular lies on either side had on voting intentions. You say 700,000 votes swayed by the NHS bus claim I could say 500,000 votes swayed by the immediate recession and half a million more unemployed claim.

We were also told no deal is better than a bad deal although May seems intent on reneging on that promise too.

Agree with your last point I bet they can't believe their luck how weak and inept our negotiating strategy has been ... unfortunately for them and us, the deal is so poor it couldn't even get through the HoC, to no one's surprise.

Not the same though really. It was clear any forecast about recession / job losses was just that, a forecast. £350million for the NHS was a specific sum, not a forecast, a promise. There is a difference as you well know.
 






JC Footy Genius

Bringer of TRUTH
Jun 9, 2015
10,568
Not the same though really. It was clear any forecast about recession / job losses was just that, a forecast. £350million for the NHS was a specific sum, not a forecast, a promise. There is a difference as you well know.

There is a difference. The 'forecasts' were presented as a virtual certainty with the weight of the government machine and by 'experts' whereas the £350m bus claim was made by a varied group of people who in the main wouldn't be in government.
 


The Clamp

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 11, 2016
26,183
West is BEST
I think normal people would have more respect for Leave voters if they admitted what we all know to be true: that they didn't know what they were voting for and that they are hoping it works out but that it doesn't look likely. Perhaps drop the blame game and accept some responsibility instead of going on the defensive. You can still salvage some dignity out of this. Many will never forgive you but you can make yourselves more credible by admitting culpability.
 
Last edited:




cunning fergus

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 18, 2009
4,885
I am not consumed with zeal, nor a particular fan of Juncker, but he isn't the bloody anti-christ either. Just trying to provide some balance to your blind hatred of the man. What would you have done to improve the fortunes of tiny Luxembourg?


You are because you are not being balanced, JCJ has overseen the tax evasion of billions of pounds in tax from countries by global multi nationals. This is fact, not speculation.

https://www.icij.org/investigations...global-companies-secret-tax-deals-luxembourg/

I honestly don’t see any aspect of his conduct in this regard that is justifiable, any comparison with a trade unionist is absurd. But you are still on here supporting him.

But for someone that wants a federal EU, maybe you can make the ends justify the means.
 


Baker lite

Banned
Mar 16, 2017
6,309
in my house
I think normal people would have more respect for Leave voters if they admitted what we all know to be true: that they didn't know what they were voting for and that they are hoping it works out but that it doesn't look likely. Perhaps drop the blame game and accept some responsibility instead of going on the defensive. You can still salvage some dignity out of this. Many will never forgive you but yuo can make yourselves more credible by admitting culpability.

You are good value, I’ll give you that.





On our way.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 


The Clamp

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 11, 2016
26,183
West is BEST
You are good value, I’ll give you that.





On our way.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

You know, I know it shouldn't as you post on here but it always surprises me that you have the ability to read or write.
 








Baldseagull

Well-known member
Jan 26, 2012
11,839
Crawley
You are because you are not being balanced, JCJ has overseen the tax evasion of billions of pounds in tax from countries by global multi nationals. This is fact, not speculation.

https://www.icij.org/investigations...global-companies-secret-tax-deals-luxembourg/

I honestly don’t see any aspect of his conduct in this regard that is justifiable, any comparison with a trade unionist is absurd. But you are still on here supporting him.

But for someone that wants a federal EU, maybe you can make the ends justify the means.

No, it's shitty, but it is legal, it is an extreme version of what Ireland and others do now and the EU is trying to clamp down on, which I fully support. It isn't fair, he allowed taxes to be avoided in one jurisdiction by allowing very low taxation in his jurisdiction, it is exactly the type of "competitiveness" Mogg and Farage advocate for the UK and I want to avoid, and you want to enable.
Tell me how Brexit fixes this?
 






The Clamp

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 11, 2016
26,183
West is BEST
Is it apparent that You don’t appreciate My vote?
I value yours, people have died for our votes.





On our way.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Which makes it even more shameful that you used yours to sell Britain down the river.

On our way indeed .
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,015
No, it's shitty, but it is legal, it is an extreme version of what Ireland and others do now and the EU is trying to clamp down on, which I fully support.

just to check, because im curious of peoples views on this, you understand the only way to resolve this long term is to control taxation through EU? are we ready to accept this?
 


Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
14,250
Cumbria
I think the term "alternative arrangements" was sufficiently vague to allow all to attach their own desires to what the alternative might be. It's becoming a familiar tactic.

The fragile Tory truce over Brexit has been shattered after Theresa May admitted there is “no suggestion” of scrapping the Irish backstop – triggering fresh anger from her anti-EU MPs.

Under pressure from business leaders in Belfast, the prime minister let slip that she will only seek “changes” to the controversial backstop – not its removal – in fresh talks in Brussels on Thursday.

The comment was seen as backtracking on last week’s Commons vote that it should be “replaced with alternative arrangements”, which Ms May had ordered Conservative MPs to support.

this is the sort of nonsense i dont understand - it was clear that was the intention a week or two ago, to make amendments to the backstop, not get rid of it outright. some of the hardline even suggested so. but theres enough not said that some can paint their own picture. then there's something said in a different way and suddenly the canvas is ripped up. and they, all of them, have been doing this same shit for over 2 years.

I think you're wrong [MENTION=599]beorhthelm[/MENTION]. You say that the intention was clear to make 'amendments' to the backstop - not to get rid of it. That is simply not what the wording of the amendment said: https://brexitcentral.com/brexit-amendment-time-look-tonight/ "“and requires the Northern Ireland backstop to be replaced with alternative arrangements to avoid a hard border; supports leaving the European Union with a deal and would therefore support the Withdrawal Agreement subject to this change”. That is - replacing the backstop with something else. Replacing. Not amending.
 




Baldseagull

Well-known member
Jan 26, 2012
11,839
Crawley
just to check, because im curious of peoples views on this, you understand the only way to resolve this long term is to control taxation through EU? are we ready to accept this?

It would depend on how much control was with the EU, they already have large controls of VAT rules. We are all aware of the avoidance that large corporations are able to achieve and as long as it was an effective and fair scheme, combating that, only those like Ireland who get benefit from sheltering corporations, or the UK that do that to a degree and also get a bit uptight over sovereignty, would object.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here