Is he ? My understanding is that the speaker is there to uphold process and procedure - to be neutral so not support MPs or government but to ensure everything is done by the rulebook. He seems to have stretched his role on this occassion.
Of course he is there to 'support MPs' ffs!
Its not for him to 'support' any certain group of MPs, but absolutely to ensure that the will of parliament is allowed to be known / heard. All he's done here is about process - he's stopped the government (in effect a minority group of MPs) from being allowed to play delaying games - forcing through a vote, to enable parliament to have their say. As [MENTION=13]CHAPPERS[/MENTION] has pointed out, he's merely enabled a vote, not influenced the outcome of one.